A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
30 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
302
45


Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
156
27

Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
115
27

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
27

Some limits of informed consent.
O O'Neill. J Med Ethics 2003
218
18

Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study.
Mary Dixon-Woods, Richard E Ashcroft, Clare J Jackson, Martin D Tobin, Joelle Kivits, Paul R Burton, Nilesh J Samani. Soc Sci Med 2007
86
18


Benefit sharing and biobanking in Australia.
Dianne Nicol, Christine Critchley. Public Underst Sci 2012
19
18

Tackling community concerns about commercialisation and genetic research: a modest interdisciplinary proposal.
Gillian Haddow, Graeme Laurie, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Kathryn G Hunter. Soc Sci Med 2007
55
18

International network of cancer genome projects.
Thomas J Hudson, Warwick Anderson, Axel Artez, Anna D Barker, Cindy Bell, Rosa R Bernabé, M K Bhan, Fabien Calvo, Iiro Eerola, Daniela S Gerhard,[...]. Nature 2010
18

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
87
18


The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
196
18

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
221
18

Meeting the governance challenges of next-generation biorepository research.
Stephanie M Fullerton, Nicholas R Anderson, Greg Guzauskas, Dena Freeman, Kelly Fryer-Edwards. Sci Transl Med 2010
49
18

Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical research.
Jane Kaye, Paula Boddington, Jantina de Vries, Naomi Hawkins, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
59
18

Patients' refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study.
Linus Johnsson, Mats G Hansson, Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson. BMJ 2008
45
18


Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.
Zubin Master, Jaime O Claudio, Christen Rachul, Jean C Y Wang, Mark D Minden, Timothy Caulfield. BMC Med Genomics 2013
35
18

Canadian province seeks control of its genes.
Robert Longtin. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
6
33

Biobankonomics: developing a sustainable business model approach for the formation of a human tissue biobank.
Jimmie Vaught, Joyce Rogers, Todd Carolin, Carolyn Compton. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011
101
18

The Babel of genetic data terminology.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Madelaine Saginur. Nat Biotechnol 2005
41
18

Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
Kristin Solum Steinsbekk, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, Berge Solberg. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
18

Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ruth Chadwick. Nat Rev Genet 2005
135
18


Genomic databases access agreements: legal validity and possible sanctions.
Yann Joly, Nik Zeps, Bartha M Knoppers. Hum Genet 2011
21
18

Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.
Gail E Henderson, R Jean Cadigan, Teresa P Edwards, Ian Conlon, Anders G Nelson, James P Evans, Arlene M Davis, Catherine Zimmer, Bryan J Weiner. Genome Med 2013
128
18

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.
Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim,[...]. Am J Bioeth 2015
141
18



From genetic privacy to open consent.
Jeantine E Lunshof, Ruth Chadwick, Daniel B Vorhaus, George M Church. Nat Rev Genet 2008
217
9

Consent forms in genomics: the difference between law and practice.
Paula Boddington, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Nadja Kanellopoulou, Karen Melham, Heather Gowans, Naomi Hawkins. Eur J Health Law 2011
10
10

Property: the future of human tissue?
Muireann Quigley. Med Law Rev 2009
14
9



More information, less understanding: a randomized study on consent issues in neonatal research.
Yvonne Freer, Neil McIntosh, Saskia Teunisse, Kanwaljeet J S Anand, Elaine M Boyle. Pediatrics 2009
33
9


Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives.
Sean Cordell, Florence Bellivier, Heather Widdows, Christine Noiville. J Med Ethics 2011
4
25




The right to withdraw from research.
G Owen Schaefer, Alan Wertheimer. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2010
12
9

Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions.
Natalie Armstrong, Mary Dixon-Woods, Anne Thomas, Gill Rusk, Carolyn Tarrant. Sociol Health Illn 2012
20
9


Where's the revolution? Digital technology and health care in the internet age.
Edward Alan Miller, Darrell M West. J Health Polit Policy Law 2009
30
9




Adverse drug reactions: role of pharmacogenomics.
Giovanni Severino, Maria Del Zompo. Pharmacol Res 2004
35
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.