A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Maki Hirano, Hiroko Satake, Satoko Ishigaki, Mitsuru Ikeda, Hisashi Kawai, Shinji Naganawa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
Times Cited: 79







List of co-cited articles
406 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yong Guo, You-Quan Cai, Zu-Long Cai, Yuan-Gui Gao, Ning-Yu An, Lin Ma, Srikanth Mahankali, Jia-Hong Gao. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002
525
31

Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.
Sibel Kul, Aysegul Cansu, Etem Alhan, Hasan Dinc, Gurbuz Gunes, Abdulkadir Reis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
143
26

Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
Wolfgang Bogner, Stephan Gruber, Katja Pinker, Günther Grabner, Andreas Stadlbauer, Michael Weber, Ewald Moser, Thomas H Helbich, Siegfried Trattnig. Radiology 2009
208
22

ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, Shinichi Kan, Hirofumi Hata, Masanori Ozaki, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Masaru Kuranami, Masahiko Watanabe, Kazushige Hayakawa. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005
237
21

Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Riham H Ei Khouli, Michael A Jacobs, Sarah D Mezban, Peng Huang, Ihab R Kamel, Katarzyna J Macura, David A Bluemke. Radiology 2010
210
21

Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, Eduardo Figueiredo, Marisa Nassar Aidar Domingues, Romeu Cortes Domingues, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
101
20

Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.
Erika Rubesova, Anne-Sophie Grell, Viviane De Maertelaer, Thierry Metens, Shih-Li Chao, Marc Lemort. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006
185
18

Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Savannah C Partridge, Christiane D Mullins, Brenda F Kurland, Michael D Allain, Wendy B DeMartini, Peter R Eby, Constance D Lehman. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
109
18

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Mi Jung Park, Eun Suk Cha, Bong Joo Kang, Yon Kwon Ihn, Jun Hyun Baik. Korean J Radiol 2007
122
17

Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.
Naoko Mori, Hideki Ota, Shunji Mugikura, Chiaki Takasawa, Junya Tominaga, Takanori Ishida, Mika Watanabe, Kei Takase, Shoki Takahashi. Eur Radiol 2013
41
34

Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application.
Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Hiroyasu Soeda, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Takeshi Kamitani, Yoshinao Oda, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi, Hiroshi Honda. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008
162
16


Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
C Marini, C Iacconi, M Giannelli, A Cilotti, M Moretti, C Bartolozzi. Eur Radiol 2007
170
16

Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.
Liuquan Cheng, Yuhan Bai, Jing Zhang, Mei Liu, Xiru Li, Ailiang Zhang, Xiaojing Zhang, Lin Ma. Tumour Biol 2013
22
54

Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Shiteng Suo, Kebei Zhang, Mengqiu Cao, Xinjun Suo, Jia Hua, Xiaochuan Geng, Jie Chen, Zhiguo Zhuang, Xiang Ji, Qing Lu,[...]. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016
82
15

Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology.
Dow-Mu Koh, David J Collins. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007
13

Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Shinichi Kan, Hirofumi Hata, Masaru Kuranami, Masahiko Watanabe, Kazushige Hayakawa. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005
230
13

Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B DeMartini, Brenda F Kurland, Peter R Eby, Steven W White, Constance D Lehman. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
183
13

Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.
Laura Martincich, Veronica Deantoni, Ilaria Bertotto, Stefania Redana, Franziska Kubatzki, Ivana Sarotto, Valentina Rossi, Michele Liotti, Riccardo Ponzone, Massimo Aglietta,[...]. Eur Radiol 2012
163
13

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Gladys G Lo, Victor Ai, John K F Chan, K W Li, Polly S Y Cheung, T T Wong, Micheal Ma, Raymond Lee, Daisy Chien. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009
65
15

Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Gada Gaballa, Adel Denewer, Nadia Nada. NMR Biomed 2010
112
12

Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Xin Chen, Wen-ling Li, Yi-li Zhang, Qian Wu, You-min Guo, Zhi-lan Bai. BMC Cancer 2010
138
12

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Chunling Liu, Changhong Liang, Zaiyi Liu, Shuixing Zhang, Biao Huang. Eur J Radiol 2013
143
12

Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Tsugumi Imamura, Ichiro Isomoto, Eijun Sueyoshi, Hiroshi Yano, Tatsuya Uga, Kuniko Abe, Tomayoshi Hayashi, Sumihisa Honda, Takuma Yamaguchi, Masataka Uetani. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010
51
17

Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness.
M Costantini, P Belli, P Rinaldi, E Bufi, G Giardina, G Franceschini, G Petrone, L Bonomo. Clin Radiol 2010
94
11

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Sung Hun Kim, Eun Suk Cha, Hyeon Sook Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Jae Jeong Choi, Ji Han Jung, Yong Gyu Park, Young Jin Suh. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009
129
11

Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method.
Ryuji Murakami, Toshinori Hirai, Takeshi Sugahara, Hirofumi Fukuoka, Ryo Toya, Shinichiro Nishimura, Mika Kitajima, Tomoko Okuda, Hideo Nakamura, Natsuo Oya,[...]. Radiology 2009
119
10

Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Takeshi Kamitani, Taro Setoguchi, Takashi Okafuji, Hiroyasu Soeda, Shuji Sakai, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Makoto Kubo, Eriko Tokunaga,[...]. Eur J Radiol 2010
82
10

Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Mami Iima, Denis Le Bihan, Ryosuke Okumura, Tomohisa Okada, Koji Fujimoto, Shotaro Kanao, Shiro Tanaka, Masakazu Fujimoto, Hiromi Sakashita, Kaori Togashi. Radiology 2011
61
13

Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Monique D Dorrius, Hildebrand Dijkstra, Matthijs Oudkerk, Paul E Sijens. Eur Radiol 2014
86
10


MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.
Claudio Spick, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Margaretha Rudas, Thomas H Helbich, Pascal A Baltzer. Eur Radiol 2014
63
12

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
Otso Arponen, Mazen Sudah, Amro Masarwah, Mikko Taina, Suvi Rautiainen, Mervi Könönen, Reijo Sironen, Veli-Matti Kosma, Anna Sutela, Juhana Hakumäki,[...]. PLoS One 2015
47
17

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Hubert Bickel, Katja Pinker, Stephan Polanec, Heinrich Magometschnigg, Georg Wengert, Claudio Spick, Wolfgang Bogner, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Thomas H Helbich, Pascal Baltzer. Eur Radiol 2017
58
13

Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
D Le Bihan, E Breton, D Lallemand, M L Aubin, J Vignaud, M Laval-Jeantet. Radiology 1988
8

Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation.
P Belli, M Costantini, E Bufi, A Magistrelli, G La Torre, L Bonomo. Radiol Med 2010
33
21

Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Hiroko Satake, Akiko Nishio, Mitsuru Ikeda, Satoko Ishigaki, Kazuhiro Shimamoto, Maki Hirano, Shinji Naganawa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
37
18

Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Reiko Woodhams, Satoko Kakita, Hirofumi Hata, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Shigeaki Umeoka, Carolyn E Mountford, Hiroto Hatabu. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
117
8

Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B Demartini, Brenda F Kurland, Peter R Eby, Steven W White, Constance D Lehman. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010
114
8

In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.
Shantanu Sinha, Flora Anne Lucas-Quesada, Usha Sinha, Nanette DeBruhl, Lawrence W Bassett. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002
188
8

Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.
Pascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Oumar Camara, Werner A Kaiser. Eur Radiol 2010
97
8

Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.
Wolfgang Bogner, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Hubert Bickel, Marek Chmelik, Michael Weber, Thomas H Helbich, Siegfried Trattnig, Stephan Gruber. Radiology 2012
149
8

Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment.
Kaiji Inoue, Eito Kozawa, Waka Mizukoshi, Junji Tanaka, Toshiaki Saeki, Takaki Sakurai, Fumiko Kimura. Jpn J Radiol 2011
20
35

Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.
Habib Rahbar, Savannah C Partridge, Peter R Eby, Wendy B Demartini, Robert L Gutierrez, Sue Peacock, Constance D Lehman. Eur Radiol 2011
58
12

Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions.
Sibel Kul, Ilker Eyuboglu, Aysegul Cansu, Etem Alhan. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014
25
28

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Sang Hee Park, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho, In Chan Song, Jung Min Chang, In-Ae Park, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh. Radiology 2010
189
8



Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma.
Louisa Bokacheva, Jennifer B Kaplan, Dilip D Giri, Sujata Patil, Merlin Gnanasigamani, C Gregory Nyman, Joseph O Deasy, Elizabeth A Morris, Sunitha B Thakur. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014
82
8

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malign breast lesions.
G Sonmez, F Cuce, H Mutlu, M Incedayi, E Ozturk, O Sildiroglu, M Velioglu, C C Bashekim, E Kizilkaya. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011
24
25


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.