A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall, Judy Illes, Moira Keane, Bartha M Knoppers, Barbara A Koenig, Isaac S Kohane, Bonnie Leroy, Karen J Maschke, William McGeveran, Pilar Ossorio, Lisa S Parker, Gloria M Petersen, Henry S Richardson, Joan A Scott, Sharon F Terry, Benjamin S Wilfond, Wendy A Wolf. Genet. Med. 2012
Times Cited: 266







List of co-cited articles
534 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet. Med. 2013
51

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014
206
46

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
262
35

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet. Med. 2017
592
25

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
403
23


Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati, Anne Marie Tassé. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
62
27

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet. Med. 2015
17


Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Rebecca Branum, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen, Susan A Berry, Laura M Beskow, Mary B Daly, Conrad V Fernandez, Robert C Green, Bonnie S LeRoy,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2015
46
32

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet. Med. 2013
191
14

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
245
14


Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet. Med. 2013
72
18


Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet. 2011
135
13


Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet. Med. 2008
144
12

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet. Med. 2012
79
15

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2006
146
11

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
145
11

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016
90
12

Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ma'n H Zawati, Karine Sénécal. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015
76
14

Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014
59
18

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
192
10

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
187
10

Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results.
Marianna J Bledsoe, William E Grizzle, Brian J Clark, Nikolajs Zeps. Genet. Med. 2012
39
23

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet. Med. 2012
120
9


Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Laura M Amendola, Michael O Dorschner, Peggy D Robertson, Joseph S Salama, Ragan Hart, Brian H Shirts, Mitzi L Murray, Mari J Tokita, Carlos J Gallego, Daniel Seung Kim,[...]. Genome Res. 2015
181
9


Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.
Marianna J Bledsoe, Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire, William E Grizzle, P Pearl O'Rourke, Nikolajs Zeps. Genet. Med. 2013
34
26

Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke, Stephanie M Fullerton, Richard R Sharp. Genet. Med. 2012
30
26

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
118
8


Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014
80
10

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
121
8

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
8

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet. Med. 2014
27
25


Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
107
7

ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource.
Heidi L Rehm, Jonathan S Berg, Lisa D Brooks, Carlos D Bustamante, James P Evans, Melissa J Landrum, David H Ledbetter, Donna R Maglott, Christa Lese Martin, Robert L Nussbaum,[...]. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015
393
7

Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.
Leslie G Biesecker, Robert C Green. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014
308
7

Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2015
180
7

Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.
Lainie Friedman Ross, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, Rebecca R Anderson. Genet. Med. 2013
227
7

Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
Stephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, Ellen Wright Clayton, Dana C Crawford, Joshua C Denny, Philip Greenland, Barbara A Koenig, Kathleen A Leppig, Noralane M Lindor,[...]. Genet. Med. 2012
77
7


The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006
165
6

Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.
Isaac S Kohane, Kenneth D Mandl, Patrick L Taylor, Ingrid A Holm, Daniel J Nigrin, Louis M Kunkel. Science 2007
91
6

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015
166
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.