C Bundesen. Psychol Rev 1990
Times Cited: 988
Times Cited: 988
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
46
A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.
Claus Bundesen, Thomas Habekost, Soren Kyllingsbaek. Psychol Rev 2005
Claus Bundesen, Thomas Habekost, Soren Kyllingsbaek. Psychol Rev 2005
25
Attentional templates in visual working memory.
Nancy B Carlisle, Jason T Arita, Deborah Pardo, Geoffrey F Woodman. J Neurosci 2011
Nancy B Carlisle, Jason T Arita, Deborah Pardo, Geoffrey F Woodman. J Neurosci 2011
15
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.
S J Luck, E K Vogel. Nature 1997
S J Luck, E K Vogel. Nature 1997
15
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
13
Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
Christian N L Olivers, Frank Meijer, Jan Theeuwes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2006
Christian N L Olivers, Frank Meijer, Jan Theeuwes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2006
13
Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.
Christian N L Olivers, Judith Peters, Roos Houtkamp, Pieter R Roelfsema. Trends Cogn Sci 2011
Christian N L Olivers, Judith Peters, Roos Houtkamp, Pieter R Roelfsema. Trends Cogn Sci 2011
12
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.
Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L Shulman. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L Shulman. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
11
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.
N Cowan. Behav Brain Sci 2001
N Cowan. Behav Brain Sci 2001
11
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
Edward K Vogel, Maro G Machizawa. Nature 2004
Edward K Vogel, Maro G Machizawa. Nature 2004
11
10
Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2007
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2007
10
Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.
H Deubel, W X Schneider. Vision Res 1996
H Deubel, W X Schneider. Vision Res 1996
10
Setting up the target template in visual search.
Timothy J Vickery, Li-Wei King, Yuhong Jiang. J Vis 2005
Timothy J Vickery, Li-Wei King, Yuhong Jiang. J Vis 2005
10
Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.
Werner X Schneider. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013
Werner X Schneider. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013
18
Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.
Michael C Hout, Stephen D Goldinger. Atten Percept Psychophys 2015
Michael C Hout, Stephen D Goldinger. Atten Percept Psychophys 2015
12
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
C L Folk, R W Remington, J C Johnston. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992
C L Folk, R W Remington, J C Johnston. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992
8
The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.
M Eimer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996
M Eimer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996
8
Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
J M Wolfe, K R Cave, S L Franzel. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989
J M Wolfe, K R Cave, S L Franzel. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989
8
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Psychol Sci 2015
Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Psychol Sci 2015
8
Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.
David Soto, John Hodsoll, Pia Rotshtein, Glyn W Humphreys. Trends Cogn Sci 2008
David Soto, John Hodsoll, Pia Rotshtein, Glyn W Humphreys. Trends Cogn Sci 2008
8
The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck, Jeffrey D Schall. Cereb Cortex 2007
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck, Jeffrey D Schall. Cereb Cortex 2007
8
Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
Andrew Hollingworth, Valerie M Beck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2016
Andrew Hollingworth, Valerie M Beck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2016
17
In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
Dirk van Moorselaar, Jan Theeuwes, Christian N L Olivers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2014
Dirk van Moorselaar, Jan Theeuwes, Christian N L Olivers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2014
11
A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.
L Itti, C Koch. Vision Res 2000
L Itti, C Koch. Vision Res 2000
8
Usability of a theory of visual attention (TVA) for parameter-based measurement of attention I: evidence from normal subjects.
Kathrin Finke, Peter Bublak, Joseph Krummenacher, Søren Kyllingsbaek, Hermann J Muller, Werner X Schneider. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005
Kathrin Finke, Peter Bublak, Joseph Krummenacher, Søren Kyllingsbaek, Hermann J Muller, Werner X Schneider. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005
9
Sustained attention, attentional selectivity, and attentional capacity across the lifespan.
Laura P McAvinue, Thomas Habekost, Katherine A Johnson, Søren Kyllingsbæk, Signe Vangkilde, Claus Bundesen, Ian H Robertson. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012
Laura P McAvinue, Thomas Habekost, Katherine A Johnson, Søren Kyllingsbæk, Signe Vangkilde, Claus Bundesen, Ian H Robertson. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012
8
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.
Steven J Luck, Edward K Vogel. Trends Cogn Sci 2013
Steven J Luck, Edward K Vogel. Trends Cogn Sci 2013
8
Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?
Geoffrey F Woodman, Nancy B Carlisle, Robert M G Reinhart. J Vis 2013
Geoffrey F Woodman, Nancy B Carlisle, Robert M G Reinhart. J Vis 2013
8
Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.
G Rizzolatti, L Riggio, I Dascola, C Umiltá. Neuropsychologia 1987
G Rizzolatti, L Riggio, I Dascola, C Umiltá. Neuropsychologia 1987
8
Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Clayton Hickey, Vincent Di Lollo, John J McDonald. J Cogn Neurosci 2009
Clayton Hickey, Vincent Di Lollo, John J McDonald. J Cogn Neurosci 2009
8
Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
Stefanie I Becker, Charles L Folk, Roger W Remington. Psychol Sci 2013
Stefanie I Becker, Charles L Folk, Roger W Remington. Psychol Sci 2013
12
The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
Stefanie I Becker. J Exp Psychol Gen 2010
Stefanie I Becker. J Exp Psychol Gen 2010
8
Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.
C L Folk, R Remington. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998
C L Folk, R Remington. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998
7
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
Jeremy M Wolfe, Todd S Horowitz. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004
Jeremy M Wolfe, Todd S Horowitz. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004
7
What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Christian N L Olivers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009
Christian N L Olivers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009
7
Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck. Psychon Bull Rev 2004
Geoffrey F Woodman, Steven J Luck. Psychon Bull Rev 2004
7
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.