A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Leigh Jackson, Lesley Goldsmith, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Am J Med Genet A 2012
Times Cited: 34







List of co-cited articles
191 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
58

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
425
38

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
116
32

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
204
32


Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
194
26

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
99
23


Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
Annelien L Bredenoord, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Johannes J M Van Delden. Hum Mutat 2011
81
17


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
190
17

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
151
17

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
123
17

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
221
17

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
114
17


Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
Meredith C Meacham, Helene Starks, Wylie Burke, Kelly Edwards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
48
14

Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing.
Zoe Lohn, Shelin Adam, Patricia Birch, Anne Townsend, Jan Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2013
42
14

The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.
Isaac S Kohane, Daniel R Masys, Russ B Altman. JAMA 2006
199
14


Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
49
14

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
77
14

Policy challenges of clinical genome sequencing.
Caroline F Wright, Anna Middleton, Hilary Burton, Fiona Cunningham, Steve E Humphries, Jane Hurst, Ewan Birney, Helen V Firth. BMJ 2013
36
14

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
67
14


Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
83
14

Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
204
14

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
720
14

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
125
11

Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Holly K Tabor, Jacquie Stock, Tracy Brazg, Margaret J McMillin, Karin M Dent, Joon-Ho Yu, Jay Shendure, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2012
81
11

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
81
11

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
169
11

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
275
11

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
121
11

Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.
Isaac S Kohane, Michael Hsing, Sek Won Kong. Genet Med 2012
83
11

Whole-genome sequencing and the physician.
A Thorogood, B M Knoppers, W J Dondorp, G M W R de Wert. Clin Genet 2012
24
16

New challenges for informed consent through whole genome array testing.
C Netzer, C Klein, J Kohlhase, C Kubisch. J Med Genet 2009
29
13

Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.
Conrad V Fernandez, Caron Strahlendorf, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Colleen O'Connell, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Kym Boycott, Poul H Sorensen. Genet Med 2013
32
12

Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing.
Kelly E Ormond, Matthew T Wheeler, Louanne Hudgins, Teri E Klein, Atul J Butte, Russ B Altman, Euan A Ashley, Henry T Greely. Lancet 2010
145
11



'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
49
11

Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.
Caroline F Wright, Tomas W Fitzgerald, Wendy D Jones, Stephen Clayton, Jeremy F McRae, Margriet van Kogelenberg, Daniel A King, Kirsty Ambridge, Daniel M Barrett, Tanya Bayzetinova,[...]. Lancet 2015
342
11


Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
47
11

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
101
11

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
59
11

Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery.
Michael J Bamshad, Sarah B Ng, Abigail W Bigham, Holly K Tabor, Mary J Emond, Deborah A Nickerson, Jay Shendure. Nat Rev Genet 2011
8

Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability.
Joep de Ligt, Marjolein H Willemsen, Bregje W M van Bon, Tjitske Kleefstra, Helger G Yntema, Thessa Kroes, Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout, David A Koolen, Petra de Vries, Christian Gilissen,[...]. N Engl J Med 2012
917
8

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.
Susanne B Haga, Julianne M O'Daniel, Genevieve M Tindall, Isaac R Lipkus, Robert Agans. Genet Med 2011
40
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.