A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Kristin Solum Steinsbekk, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, Berge Solberg. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 133







List of co-cited articles
422 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
255
41

Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Harriet J A Teare, Jane Kaye, Stephan Beck, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Luciana Caenazzo, Clive Collett, Flavio D'Abramo, Heike Felzmann, Teresa Finlay,[...]. BMC Med Ethics 2017
115
26

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.
Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim,[...]. Am J Bioeth 2015
156
25

Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?
Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol 2006
233
19

Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?
Mark Sheehan. Public Health Ethics 2011
71
23

Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
B Hofmann. J Med Ethics 2009
98
17

Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research.
Hawys Williams, Karen Spencer, Caroline Sanders, David Lund, Edgar A Whitley, Jane Kaye, William G Dixon. JMIR Med Inform 2015
60
21

Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.
Amy L McGuire, Laura M Beskow. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
104
11

Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
112
11

Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Melissa Gymrek, Amy L McGuire, David Golan, Eran Halperin, Yaniv Erlich. Science 2013
499
10

A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.
Nanibaa' A Garrison, Nila A Sathe, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Ingrid A Holm, Saskia C Sanderson, Maureen E Smith, Melissa L McPheeters, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2016
109
10


Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
Karen Spencer, Caroline Sanders, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Jane Kaye, William Gregory Dixon. J Med Internet Res 2016
84
11

In defense of broad consent.
Gert Helgesson. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2012
43
20

From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.
Jane Kaye, Liam Curren, Nick Anderson, Kelly Edwards, Stephanie M Fullerton, Nadja Kanellopoulou, David Lund, Daniel G MacArthur, Deborah Mascalzoni, James Shepherd,[...]. Nat Rev Genet 2012
169
9

Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.
Harriet Ja Teare, Michael Morrison, Edgar A Whitley, Jane Kaye. Digit Health 2015
26
34

Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.
Zubin Master, Erin Nelson, Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield. Nat Methods 2012
56
14



Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.
Daniel B Thiel, Jodyn Platt, Tevah Platt, Susan B King, Nicole Fisher, Robert Shelton, Sharon L R Kardia. Public Health Genomics 2015
30
26


Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.
Megan Prictor, Harriet J A Teare, Jane Kaye. Front Public Health 2018
24
33

Ethics and biobanks.
M G Hansson. Br J Cancer 2009
108
7

The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.
Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Luciano Floridi. Sci Eng Ethics 2016
150
7


Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Judy Allen, Beverley McNamara. Bioethics 2011
48
14

Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: a qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience.
Paulina Tindana, Susan Bull, Lucas Amenga-Etego, Jantina de Vries, Raymond Aborigo, Kwadwo Koram, Dominic Kwiatkowski, Michael Parker. BMC Med Ethics 2012
72
9

Evaluating the consent preferences of UK research volunteers for genetic and clinical studies.
Susan E Kelly, Timothy D Spector, Lynn F Cherkas, Barbara Prainsack, Juliette M Harris. PLoS One 2015
27
25

Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.
Zubin Master, Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Timothy Caulfield. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
23
30

Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework.
Megan Prictor, Megan A Lewis, Ainsley J Newson, Matilda Haas, Sachiko Baba, Hannah Kim, Minori Kokado, Jusaku Minari, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor, Beverley Yamamoto,[...]. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2020
18
38


From genetic privacy to open consent.
Jeantine E Lunshof, Ruth Chadwick, Daniel B Vorhaus, George M Church. Nat Rev Genet 2008
221
6

Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.
Nils Homer, Szabolcs Szelinger, Margot Redman, David Duggan, Waibhav Tembe, Jill Muehling, John V Pearson, Dietrich A Stephan, Stanley F Nelson, David W Craig. PLoS Genet 2008
471
6

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
6

Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.
Jan Reinert Karlsen, Jan Helge Solbakk, Søren Holm. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011
18
33

Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.
Adam Nishimura, Jantey Carey, Patricia J Erwin, Jon C Tilburt, M Hassan Murad, Jennifer B McCormick. BMC Med Ethics 2013
266
6


Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
308
6

Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
Evette J Ludman, Stephanie M Fullerton, Leslie Spangler, Susan Brown Trinidad, Monica M Fujii, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
86
6

The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study: rationale, objectives, and preliminary results.
Cristian Pattaro, Martin Gögele, Deborah Mascalzoni, Roberto Melotti, Christine Schwienbacher, Alessandro De Grandi, Luisa Foco, Yuri D'Elia, Barbara Linder, Christian Fuchsberger,[...]. J Transl Med 2015
40
15

The RUDY study platform - a novel approach to patient driven research in rare musculoskeletal diseases.
M K Javaid, L Forestier-Zhang, L Watts, A Turner, C Ponte, H Teare, D Gray, N Gray, R Popert, J Hogg,[...]. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016
29
20

Biobanking past, present and future: responsibilities and benefits.
Yvonne G De Souza, John S Greenspan. AIDS 2013
131
6

Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.
Menno Mostert, Annelien L Bredenoord, Monique C I H Biesaart, Johannes J M van Delden. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
45
13

Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.
George Gaskell, Herbert Gottweis, Johannes Starkbaum, Monica M Gerber, Jacqueline Broerse, Ursula Gottweis, Abbi Hobbs, Ilpo Helén, Maria Paschou, Karoliina Snell,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
62
8


A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks.
Barbara Prainsack, Alena Buyx. Med Law Rev 2013
41
12


Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review.
Hélène Nobile, Eric Vermeulen, Kristof Thys, Manuela M Bergmann, Pascal Borry. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2013
37
13


Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
188
5


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.