A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

L Martin, S Van Dulmen, E Spelten, A De Jonge, P De Cock, E Hutton. Prenat Diagn 2013
Times Cited: 22







List of co-cited articles
83 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Midwives' views on appropriate antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: do they match clients' preferences?
Linda Martin, Eileen K Hutton, Evelien R Spelten, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Sandra van Dulmen. Midwifery 2014
20
60

Evaluation of primary care midwifery in The Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER).
Judith Manniën, Trudy Klomp, Therese Wiegers, Monique Pereboom, Johannes Brug, Ank de Jonge, Margreeth van der Meijde, Eileen Hutton, Francois Schellevis, Evelien Spelten. BMC Health Serv Res 2012
42
36

The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice.
D Roter, L Ellington, L Hamby Erby, S Larson, W Dudley. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2006
78
31

Comparing genetic counseling with non-genetic health care interactions: two of a kind?
Ellen Smets, Myra van Zwieten, Susan Michie. Patient Educ Couns 2007
35
31


Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: an exploratory video-observational study about client-midwife communication.
Linda Martin, Eileen K Hutton, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Evelien R Spelten, Fleur Kuiper, Monique T R Pereboom, Sandra van Dulmen. Midwifery 2015
8
75

Introducing video recording in primary care midwifery for research purposes: procedure, dataset, and use.
Evelien R Spelten, Linda Martin, Janneke T Gitsels, Monique T R Pereboom, Eileen K Hutton, Sandra van Dulmen. Midwifery 2015
8
75

Informed decision-making about the fetal anomaly scan: what knowledge is relevant?
H M H J D Schoonen, M L Essink-Bot, H M E Van Agt, H I Wildschut, E A P Steegers, H J De Koning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011
15
33

Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.
Bettina Meiser, Jennifer Irle, Elizabeth Lobb, Kristine Barlow-Stewart. J Genet Couns 2008
97
22

Low uptake of the combined test in The Netherlands--which factors contribute?
Merel Bakker, Erwin Birnie, Eva Pajkrt, Caterina Maddalena Bilardo, Rosalinde Johanna Maria Snijders. Prenat Diagn 2012
52
22

Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome.
Mirjam P Fransen, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Ineke Vogel, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Hajo I J Wildschut. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010
35
22

A measure of informed choice.
T M Marteau, E Dormandy, S Michie. Health Expect 2001
449
22

Prenatal screening for congenital anomalies: exploring midwives' perceptions of counseling clients with religious backgrounds.
Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Judith Manniën, Lisanne A Gitsels, Hans S Reinders, Pieternel S Verhoeven, Mohammed M Ghaly, Trudy Klomp, Eileen K Hutton. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014
18
27

Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.
Dick Oepkes, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Caroline J Bax, Mireille N Bekker, Catia M Bilardo, Elles M J Boon, G Heleen Schuring-Blom, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Robert-Jan H Galjaard,[...]. Prenat Diagn 2016
87
22

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.
Reana Tischler, Louanne Hudgins, Yair J Blumenfeld, Henry T Greely, Kelly E Ormond. Prenat Diagn 2011
98
18

Implications of a first trimester Down syndrome screening program on timing of malformation detection.
Tanja Roien Jakobsen, Kirsten Søgaard, Ann Tabor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011
13
30

Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.
Glyn Elwyn, Dominick Frosch, Richard Thomson, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Amy Lloyd, Paul Kinnersley, Emma Cording, Dave Tomson, Carole Dodd, Stephen Rollnick,[...]. J Gen Intern Med 2012
18



Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.
Rachèl V van Schendel, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Lean Beulen, Catia M Bilardo, Marjon A de Boer, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Irene M van Langen, Klaske D Lichtenbelt, Merel C van Maarle,[...]. Prenat Diagn 2016
32
18

Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study.
Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Pieternel S Verhoeven, Judith Manniën, Linda Martin, Hans S Reinders, Evelien Spelten, Eileen K Hutton. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014
38
18


A qualitative study on how Muslim women of Moroccan descent approach antenatal anomaly screening.
Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Linda Martin, Judith Manniën, Pieternel Verhoeven, Eileen K Hutton, Hans S Reinders. Midwifery 2015
9
44

Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: what knowledge is relevant?
H M H J D Schoonen, H M E van Agt, M L Essink-Bot, H I Wildschut, E A P Steegers, H J de Koning. Patient Educ Couns 2011
21
14


Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids.
Annette M O'Connor, France Légaré, Dawn Stacey. BMJ 2003
221
13

Arriving at the postmodern medical consultation.
Glyn Elwyn. Eur J Gen Pract 2004
18
16

Tailoring communication in cancer genetic counseling through individual video-supported feedback: a controlled pretest-posttest design.
Arwen H Pieterse, Alexandra M van Dulmen, Frits A Beemer, Margreet G E M Ausems, Jozien M Bensing. Patient Educ Couns 2006
26
13

What information do Dutch midwives give clients about toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus prevention? An exploratory study of videotaped consultations.
Monique T R Pereboom, Judith Manniën, Kelly D J van Almkerk, Evelien R Spelten, Janneke T Gitsels, Linda Martin, Eileen K Hutton, François G Schellevis. Patient Educ Couns 2014
10
30

The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Soc Sci Med 2008
51
13

Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.
Mirjam P Fransen, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Anke Oenema, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Hajo I J Wildschut. Prenat Diagn 2007
24
13

The role of religion in decision-making on antenatal screening of congenital anomalies: a qualitative study amongst Muslim Turkish origin immigrants.
Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Judith Manniën, Mohammed M Ghaly, Pieternel S Verhoeven, Eileen K Hutton, Hans S Reinders. Midwifery 2014
19
15

Ethnic differences in participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a register-based study.
Mirjam P Fransen, Marleen H M H J D Schoonen, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Harry J de Koning, Jacqueline A M Laudy, Robert-Jan Galjaard, Caspar W N Looman, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Hajo I J Wildschut. Prenat Diagn 2010
26
13

First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in Denmark: implications for detection and birth rates of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13.
C K Ekelund, O B Petersen, L Skibsted, S Kjaergaard, I Vogel, A Tabor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011
37
13

Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Prenat Diagn 2008
42
13

Midwives' perceptions of communication during videotaped counseling for prenatal anomaly tests: how do they relate to clients' perceptions and independent observations?
Linda Martin, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Monique T R Pereboom, Evelien R Spelten, Eileen K Hutton, Sandra van Dulmen. Patient Educ Couns 2015
5
60

Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: pregnant Muslim Moroccan women's preferences.
Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Linda Martin, Judith Manniën, Pieternel Verhoeven, Eileen K Hutton, Hans S Reinders. Midwifery 2015
7
42

Genetic screening and democracy: lessons from debating genetic screening criteria in the Netherlands.
Carla Geertruida van El, Toine Pieters, Martina Cornel. J Community Genet 2012
20
15

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
Rachèl V van Schendel, Wybo J Dondorp, Danielle R M Timmermans, Eline J H van Hugte, Anne de Boer, Eva Pajkrt, Augusta M A Lachmeijer, Lidewij Henneman. Prenat Diagn 2015
44
13


Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: an explorative qualitative study.
Myra van Zwieten, Dick Willems, Lia Knegt, Nico Leschot. Patient Educ Couns 2006
5
40


Information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome: ethnic differences in knowledge.
Mirjam P Fransen, Hajo Wildschut, Ineke Vogel, Johan Mackenbach, Eric Steegers, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot. Patient Educ Couns 2009
17
11


Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?
A H Pieterse, A M van Dulmen, M G E M Ausems, F A Beemer, J M Bensing. Br J Cancer 2005
52
9

The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.
Marleen Schoonen, Hajo Wildschut, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Ingrid Peters, Eric Steegers, Harry de Koning. Patient Educ Couns 2012
22
9

Older cancer patients' information and communication needs: what they want is what they get?
Julia C M van Weert, Sifra Bolle, Sandra van Dulmen, Jesse Jansen. Patient Educ Couns 2013
35
9

Slicing it thin: new methods for brief sampling analysis using RIAS-coded medical dialogue.
Debra L Roter, Judith A Hall, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Susan Larson, Richard M Frankel. Patient Educ Couns 2011
19
10

Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing.
Lee Ellington, Kimberly M Kelly, Maija Reblin, Seth Latimer, Debra Roter. Health Commun 2011
28
9



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.