A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

B F Darst, L Madlensky, N J Schork, E J Topol, C S Bloss. Clin Genet 2013
Times Cited: 23







List of co-cited articles
113 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
346
34

"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.
Erynn S Gordon, Georgia Griffin, Lisa Wawak, Hauchie Pang, Sarah E Gollust, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2012
47
30

Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
101
30


Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
113
26


Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Monica A Giovanni, Matthew R Fickie, Lisa S Lehmann, Robert C Green, Lisa M Meckley, David Veenstra, Michael F Murray. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010
38
21



Psychological distress with direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a case report of an unexpected BRCA positive test result.
Lindsay Dohany, Shanna Gustafson, Whitney Ducaine, Dana Zakalik. J Genet Couns 2012
18
27

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
152
17

A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
370
17

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
84
17

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.
Kimberly A Kaphingst, Colleen M McBride, Christopher Wade, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert Reid, Eric Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2012
87
17

Impact of direct-to-consumer predictive genomic testing on risk perception and worry among patients receiving routine care in a preventive health clinic.
Katherine M James, Clayton T Cowl, Jon C Tilburt, Pamela S Sinicrope, Marguerite E Robinson, Katrin R Frimannsdottir, Kristina Tiedje, Barbara A Koenig. Mayo Clin Proc 2011
29
17

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
153
17

An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
Gemma R Brett, Sylvia A Metcalfe, David J Amor, Jane L Halliday. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
36
17


Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Deanna Alexis Carere, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Mack T Ruffin, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Ann Intern Med 2016
66
17




A family experience of personal genomics.
Manuel Corpas. J Genet Couns 2012
13
23

Self diagnosis of Lynch syndrome using direct to consumer genetic testing: a case study.
Maegan E Roberts, Douglas L Riegert-Johnson, Brittany C Thomas. J Genet Couns 2011
13
23

Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative®: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine.
Margaret A Keller, Erynn S Gordon, Catharine B Stack, Neda Gharani, Courtney J Sill, Tara J Schmidlen, Mintzer Joseph, John Pallies, Norman P Gerry, Michael F Christman. Per Med 2010
41
13

General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.
I M Lipkus, G Samsa, B K Rimer. Med Decis Making 2001
690
13

Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.
Denise M Lautenbach, Kurt D Christensen, Jeffrey A Sparks, Robert C Green. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013
83
13

A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy.
Chris M R Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries. J Genet Couns 2009
83
13


Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.
Robert J Reid, Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Cristofer Price, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody, Eric B Larson. Genet Med 2012
30
13

Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
39
13

Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.
Effy Vayena, Christian Ineichen, Elia Stoupka, Ernst Hafen. Public Health Genomics 2014
19
15


Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing.
Uta Francke, Cheri Dijamco, Amy K Kiefer, Nicholas Eriksson, Bianca Moiseff, Joyce Y Tung, Joanna L Mountain. PeerJ 2013
49
13

Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Burcu F Darst, Eric J Topol, Nicholas J Schork. Hum Mol Genet 2011
60
13

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
111
13

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet Med 2010
89
13

The challenge of implementing genetic tests with clinical utility while avoiding unsound applications.
Martina C Cornel, Carla G van El, Pascal Borry. J Community Genet 2014
15
20

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
Pascal Borry, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
71
13


Variations in predicted risks in personal genome testing for common complex diseases.
Rachel R J Kalf, Raluca Mihaescu, Suman Kundu, Peter de Knijff, Robert C Green, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet Med 2014
42
13



Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet Med 2011
43
13

High Satisfaction and Low Distress in Breast Cancer Patients One Year after BRCA-Mutation Testing without Prior Face-to-Face Genetic Counseling.
Aisha S Sie, Liesbeth Spruijt, Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams, Arjen R Mensenkamp, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Han G Brunner, Judith B Prins, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge. J Genet Couns 2016
21
14


Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine.
Alan E Guttmacher, Amy L McGuire, Bruce Ponder, Kári Stefánsson. Nat Rev Genet 2010
82
8

Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services.
Kenta Imai, Larry J Kricka, Paolo Fortina. Clin Chem 2011
43
8

A critical view of the general public's awareness and physicians' opinion of the trends and potential pitfalls of genetic testing in Greece.
Yuan Mai, Theodora Koromila, Aggeliki Sagia, David N Cooper, Georgios Vlachopoulos, George Lagoumintzis, Panagoula Kollia, Konstantinos Poulas, Vlassios Stathakopoulos, George P Patrinos. Per Med 2011
33
8

Knowledge, attitudes and education of pharmacists regarding pharmacogenetic testing.
Mary W Roederer, Marcia Van Riper, John Valgus, George Knafl, Howard McLeod. Per Med 2012
49
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.