A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Gavin M Bidelman. Front Psychol 2013
Times Cited: 30







List of co-cited articles
275 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.
Bharath Chandrasekaran, Nina Kraus. Psychophysiology 2010
259
40

Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem.
Gavin M Bidelman, Jackson T Gandour, Ananthanarayan Krishnan. J Cogn Neurosci 2011
184
33

Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.
Patrick C M Wong, Erika Skoe, Nicole M Russo, Tasha Dees, Nina Kraus. Nat Neurosci 2007
473
33

Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.
Gabriella Musacchia, Mikko Sams, Erika Skoe, Nina Kraus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007
328
33


Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.
Gavin M Bidelman, Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Jackson T Gandour. Eur J Neurosci 2011
59
26




Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth.
R Plomp, W J Levelt. J Acoust Soc Am 1965
200
23

The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex.
Roy D Patterson, Stefan Uppenkamp, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Timothy D Griffiths. Neuron 2002
454
23


Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system.
Gavin M Bidelman, Sylvain Moreno, Claude Alain. Neuroimage 2013
92
20

The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns.
Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Jackson T Gandour. Brain Lang 2009
86
20

Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.
H Sohmer, H Pratt, R Kinarti. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1977
103
20

Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.
Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Yisheng Xu, Jackson Gandour, Peter Cariani. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005
249
20

Central auditory processing of noncontextual consonance in music: an evoked potential study.
Kosuke Itoh, Shugo Suwazono, Tsutomu Nakada. J Acoust Soc Am 2010
21
28

Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.
Bharath Chandrasekaran, Nina Kraus, Patrick C M Wong. J Neurophysiol 2012
66
20

Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.
Steven J Aiken, Terence W Picton. Hear Res 2008
217
20

Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.
P X Joris, C E Schreiner, A Rees. Physiol Rev 2004
515
20


Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG.
Emily B J Coffey, Sibylle C Herholz, Alexander M P Chepesiuk, Sylvain Baillet, Robert J Zatorre. Nat Commun 2016
165
20

Music training for the development of auditory skills.
Nina Kraus, Bharath Chandrasekaran. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010
451
16

Experience-dependent plasticity in pitch encoding: from brainstem to auditory cortex.
Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Jackson Thomas Gandour, Gavin M Bidelman. Neuroreport 2012
41
16

Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources.
J C Smith, J T Marsh, W S Brown. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975
199
16

Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials.
T W Picton, C Alain, D L Woods, M S John, M Scherg, P Valdes-Sosa, J Bosch-Bayard, N J Trujillo. Audiol Neurootol 1999
230
16

Coordinated plasticity in brainstem and auditory cortex contributes to enhanced categorical speech perception in musicians.
Gavin M Bidelman, Michael W Weiss, Sylvain Moreno, Claude Alain. Eur J Neurosci 2014
87
16

Relationship between brainstem, cortical and behavioral measures relevant to pitch salience in humans.
Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Gavin M Bidelman, Christopher J Smalt, Saradha Ananthakrishnan, Jackson T Gandour. Neuropsychologia 2012
50
16

The auditory brainstem is a barometer of rapid auditory learning.
E Skoe, J Krizman, E Spitzer, N Kraus. Neuroscience 2013
54
16

Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.
Samuele Carcagno, Christopher J Plack. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011
91
16




Selective subcortical enhancement of musical intervals in musicians.
Kyung Myun Lee, Erika Skoe, Nina Kraus, Richard Ashley. J Neurosci 2009
95
16


Functional MRI/event-related potential study of sensory consonance and dissonance in musicians and nonmusicians.
Ludovico Minati, Cristina Rosazza, Ludovico D'Incerti, Emanuela Pietrocini, Laura Valentini, Vidmer Scaioli, Catherine Loveday, Maria Grazia Bruzzone. Neuroreport 2009
36
16

Brain processing of consonance/dissonance in musicians and controls: a hemispheric asymmetry revisited.
Alice Mado Proverbio, Andrea Orlandi, Francesca Pisanu. Eur J Neurosci 2016
14
35

Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
Alexandra Parbery-Clark, Erika Skoe, Carrie Lam, Nina Kraus. Ear Hear 2009
272
13


A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials.
M Scherg, J Vajsar, T W Picton. J Cogn Neurosci 1989
456
13

Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response.
G C Galbraith, P W Arbagey, R Branski, N Comerci, P M Rector. Neuroreport 1995
97
13

Specialization among the specialized: auditory brainstem function is tuned in to timbre.
Dana L Strait, Karen Chan, Richard Ashley, Nina Kraus. Cortex 2012
47
13


Consonance theory part I: consonance of dyads.
A Kameoka, M Kuriyagawa. J Acoust Soc Am 1969
68
13


Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech.
Robert J. Zatorre, Pascal Belin, Virginia B. Penhune. Trends Cogn Sci 2002
821
13

Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music.
Thomas Fritz, Sebastian Jentschke, Nathalie Gosselin, Daniela Sammler, Isabelle Peretz, Robert Turner, Angela D Friederici, Stefan Koelsch. Curr Biol 2009
178
13

Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.
Josh H McDermott, Andriana J Lehr, Andrew J Oxenham. Curr Biol 2010
103
13



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.