A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eline M Bunnik, Antina de Jong, Niels Nijsingh, Guido M W R de Wert. Bioethics 2013
Times Cited: 33







List of co-cited articles
136 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
33

Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Danielle Soucier, Karen Hanson, Melissa S Savage, Laird Jackson, Ronald J Wapner. Genet Med 2013
128
15



Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.
Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014
31
12

Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.
Anne Andermann, Ingeborg Blancquaert, Sylvie Beauchamp, Véronique Déry. Bull World Health Organ 2008
410
12


Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.
Sunayna Best, Karen Wou, Neeta Vora, Ignatia B Van der Veyver, Ronald Wapner, Lyn S Chitty. Prenat Diagn 2018
128
12

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
783
12

Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units.
Carol Jean Saunders, Neil Andrew Miller, Sarah Elizabeth Soden, Darrell Lee Dinwiddie, Aaron Noll, Noor Abu Alnadi, Nevene Andraws, Melanie LeAnn Patterson, Lisa Ann Krivohlavek, Joel Fellis,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2012
362
9

Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Melissa Gymrek, Amy L McGuire, David Golan, Eran Halperin, Yaniv Erlich. Science 2013
461
9


A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.
Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
49
9

Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
Ronald J Wapner, Christa Lese Martin, Brynn Levy, Blake C Ballif, Christine M Eng, Julia M Zachary, Melissa Savage, Lawrence D Platt, Daniel Saltzman, William A Grobman,[...]. N Engl J Med 2012
637
9

Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.
Antina de Jong, Wybo J Dondorp, Merryn V E Macville, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Jan M M van Lith, Guido M W R de Wert. Hum Genet 2014
26
11

Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.
Antina de Jong, Wybo J Dondorp, Suzanna G M Frints, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Guido M W R de Wert. Nat Rev Genet 2011
80
9

Development of a tiered and binned genetic counseling model for informed consent in the era of multiplex testing for cancer susceptibility.
Angela R Bradbury, Linda Patrick-Miller, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill Stopfer, Andrea Forman, Christina Rybak, Kristin Mattie, Amanda Brandt, Rachelle Chambers,[...]. Genet Med 2015
51
9

Generic consent for genetic screening.
S Elias, G J Annas. N Engl J Med 1994
111
9

Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Erik Parens, Cameron R Waldman, Robert Klitzman, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Hastings Cent Rep 2014
49
9

Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.
Shilpa Chetty, Matthew J Garabedian, Mary E Norton. Prenat Diagn 2013
117
9

Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening.
Rachèl V van Schendel, Johanna H Kleinveld, Wybo J Dondorp, Eva Pajkrt, Danielle R M Timmermans, Kim C A Holtkamp, Margreet Karsten, Anne L Vlietstra, Augusta M A Lachmeijer, Lidewij Henneman. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
69
9

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
85
9

Public views on participating in newborn screening using genome sequencing.
Yvonne Bombard, Fiona A Miller, Robin Z Hayeems, Carolyn Barg, Celine Cressman, June C Carroll, Brenda J Wilson, Julian Little, Denise Avard, Michael Painter-Main,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
18
16

Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing.
Robert Klitzman, Wendy Chung, Karen Marder, Anita Shanmugham, Lisa J Chin, Meredith Stark, Cheng-Shiun Leu, Paul S Appelbaum. J Genet Couns 2013
104
9

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
234
9

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Yvonne Bombard, Diana W Bianchi, Carsten Bergmann, Pascal Borry, Lyn S Chitty, Florence Fellmann, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
132
9

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
54
9

Prenatal exome sequencing in anomalous fetuses: new opportunities and challenges.
Neeta L Vora, Bradford Powell, Alicia Brandt, Natasha Strande, Emily Hardisty, Kelly Gilmore, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Kirk Wilhelmsen, Chris Bizon, Jason Reilly,[...]. Genet Med 2017
78
9

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
156
6

A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.
Y Miki, J Swensen, D Shattuck-Eidens, P A Futreal, K Harshman, S Tavtigian, Q Liu, C Cochran, L M Bennett, W Ding. Science 1994
6

Ethical issues with newborn screening in the genomics era.
Beth A Tarini, Aaron J Goldenberg. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012
62
6

Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Jeffrey G Reid, Matthew N Bainbridge, Alecia Willis, Patricia A Ward, Alicia Braxton, Joke Beuten, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu,[...]. N Engl J Med 2013
6

Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.
Holly K Tabor, Benjamin E Berkman, Sara Chandros Hull, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2011
93
6

Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes.
Sarah B Ng, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Steven D Flygare, Abigail W Bigham, Choli Lee, Tristan Shaffer, Michelle Wong, Arindam Bhattacharjee, Evan E Eichler,[...]. Nature 2009
6

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
211
6

Geneticists push for global data-sharing.
Erika Check Hayden. Nature 2013
30
6

Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.
Nils Homer, Szabolcs Szelinger, Margot Redman, David Duggan, Waibhav Tembe, Jill Muehling, John V Pearson, Dietrich A Stephan, Stanley F Nelson, David W Craig. PLoS Genet 2008
443
6

Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery.
Michael J Bamshad, Sarah B Ng, Abigail W Bigham, Holly K Tabor, Mary J Emond, Deborah A Nickerson, Jay Shendure. Nat Rev Genet 2011
6

Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Holly K Tabor, Jacquie Stock, Tracy Brazg, Margaret J McMillin, Karin M Dent, Joon-Ho Yu, Jay Shendure, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2012
82
6

What can exome sequencing do for you?
Jacek Majewski, Jeremy Schwartzentruber, Emilie Lalonde, Alexandre Montpetit, Nada Jabado. J Med Genet 2011
207
6

Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing.
Lira Mamanova, Alison J Coffey, Carol E Scott, Iwanka Kozarewa, Emily H Turner, Akash Kumar, Eleanor Howard, Jay Shendure, Daniel J Turner. Nat Methods 2010
657
6


Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.
Amy L McGuire, Timothy Caulfield, Mildred K Cho. Nat Rev Genet 2008
141
6

Opportunities and challenges associated with clinical diagnostic genome sequencing: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Iris Schrijver, Nazneen Aziz, Daniel H Farkas, Manohar Furtado, Andrea Ferreira Gonzalez, Timothy C Greiner, Wayne W Grody, Tina Hambuch, Lisa Kalman, Jeffrey A Kant,[...]. J Mol Diagn 2012
103
6

Personal genome testing: test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues.
Eline M Bunnik, Maartje H N Schermer, A Cecile J W Janssens. BMC Med Ethics 2011
40
6


ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007.
C Sue Richards, Sherri Bale, Daniel B Bellissimo, Soma Das, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Brian E Ward. Genet Med 2008
514
6

American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Mark E Robson, Courtney D Storm, Jeffrey Weitzel, Dana S Wollins, Kenneth Offit. J Clin Oncol 2010
294
6

Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net?
Susan M Domchek, Angela Bradbury, Judy E Garber, Kenneth Offit, Mark E Robson. J Clin Oncol 2013
155
6



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.