A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
Times Cited: 57







List of co-cited articles
324 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
54

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
53
32


Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
213
28

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
24

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
463
19

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
19

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
238
17


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
831
15


Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
86
14

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
207
12

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information.
Morris W Foster, John J Mulvihill, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2009
124
12

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
122
12

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
88
12

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
158
12

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
111
12

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Med Genet 2013
29
20

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
128
10

Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.
Tessel Rigter, Lidewij Henneman, Ulf Kristoffersson, Alison Hall, Helger G Yntema, Pascal Borry, Holger Tönnies, Quinten Waisfisz, Mariet W Elting, Wybo J Dondorp,[...]. Hum Mutat 2013
39
15

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
50
12

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
10

Description and pilot results from a novel method for evaluating return of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing technologies.
Katrina A B Goddard, Evelyn P Whitlock, Jonathan S Berg, Marc S Williams, Elizabeth M Webber, Jennifer A Webster, Jennifer S Lin, Kasmintan A Schrader, Doug Campos-Outcalt, Kenneth Offit,[...]. Genet Med 2013
33
18


Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
74
10

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.
F Reed Johnson, Emily Lancsar, Deborah Marshall, Vikram Kilambi, Axel Mühlbacher, Dean A Regier, Brian W Bresnahan, Barbara Kanninen, John F P Bridges. Value Health 2013
614
10

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
118
10

Incidental findings in genetic research and clinical diagnostic tests: a systematic review.
Leigh Jackson, Lesley Goldsmith, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Am J Med Genet A 2012
36
13




ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing.
Heidi L Rehm, Sherri J Bale, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir, Jonathan S Berg, Kerry K Brown, Joshua L Deignan, Michael J Friez, Birgit H Funke, Madhuri R Hegde, Elaine Lyon. Genet Med 2013
532
8

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
Paul A Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G Conde. J Biomed Inform 2009
8


Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heard.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Jan M Friedman. Genet Med 2013
35
14

Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap.
Scott D Grosse, Colleen M McBride, James P Evans, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2009
56
8

Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
S I Ziniel, S K Savage, N Huntington, J Amatruda, R C Green, E R Weitzman, P Taylor, I A Holm. Public Health Genomics 2014
21
23


Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
83
8

The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program: insights into rare diseases.
William A Gahl, Thomas C Markello, Camilo Toro, Karin Fuentes Fajardo, Murat Sincan, Fred Gill, Hannah Carlson-Donohoe, Andrea Gropman, Tyler Mark Pierson, Gretchen Golas,[...]. Genet Med 2012
180
7

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
7

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
105
7

Secondary variants--in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
25
16

Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing.
Zoe Lohn, Shelin Adam, Patricia Birch, Anne Townsend, Jan Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2013
43
9



ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007.
C Sue Richards, Sherri Bale, Daniel B Bellissimo, Soma Das, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Brian E Ward. Genet Med 2008
529
7




Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.