W H Miltner, C H Braun, M G Coles. J Cogn Neurosci 1997
Times Cited: 1038
Times Cited: 1038
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.
Clay B Holroyd, Michael G H Coles. Psychol Rev 2002
Clay B Holroyd, Michael G H Coles. Psychol Rev 2002
69
The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses.
William J Gehring, Adrian R Willoughby. Science 2002
William J Gehring, Adrian R Willoughby. Science 2002
44
The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.
Greg Hajcak Proudfit. Psychophysiology 2015
Greg Hajcak Proudfit. Psychophysiology 2015
39
Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
Matthew M Walsh, John R Anderson. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012
Matthew M Walsh, John R Anderson. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012
36
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.
Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig. J Neurosci Methods 2004
Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig. J Neurosci Methods 2004
33
A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages.
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Psychol Bull 2015
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Psychol Bull 2015
32
The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.
Clay B Holroyd, Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2008
Clay B Holroyd, Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2008
32
The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Biol Psychol 2006
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Biol Psychol 2006
30
Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain.
Nick Yeung, Alan G Sanfey. J Neurosci 2004
Nick Yeung, Alan G Sanfey. J Neurosci 2004
28
The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.
Tobias U Hauser, Reto Iannaccone, Philipp Stämpfli, Renate Drechsler, Daniel Brandeis, Susanne Walitza, Silvia Brem. Neuroimage 2014
Tobias U Hauser, Reto Iannaccone, Philipp Stämpfli, Renate Drechsler, Daniel Brandeis, Susanne Walitza, Silvia Brem. Neuroimage 2014
22
The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.
Deborah Talmi, Ryan Atkinson, Wael El-Deredy. J Neurosci 2013
Deborah Talmi, Ryan Atkinson, Wael El-Deredy. J Neurosci 2013
21
Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations.
Olave E Krigolson. Int J Psychophysiol 2018
Olave E Krigolson. Int J Psychophysiol 2018
35
ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
Nick Yeung, Clay B Holroyd, Jonathan D Cohen. Cereb Cortex 2005
Nick Yeung, Clay B Holroyd, Jonathan D Cohen. Cereb Cortex 2005
19
Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance.
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Clay B Holroyd, Nisan Mol, Michael G H Coles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Clay B Holroyd, Nisan Mol, Michael G H Coles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004
19
Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity.
Dan Foti, Anna Weinberg, Joseph Dien, Greg Hajcak. Hum Brain Mapp 2011
Dan Foti, Anna Weinberg, Joseph Dien, Greg Hajcak. Hum Brain Mapp 2011
19
Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning.
René San Martín. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
René San Martín. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
18
Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
James E Glazer, Nicholas J Kelley, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Vijay A Mittal, Robin Nusslock. Int J Psychophysiol 2018
James E Glazer, Nicholas J Kelley, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Vijay A Mittal, Robin Nusslock. Int J Psychophysiol 2018
20
Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra.
Michael X Cohen, Christian E Elger, Charan Ranganath. Neuroimage 2007
Michael X Cohen, Christian E Elger, Charan Ranganath. Neuroimage 2007
17
Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task.
Clay B Holroyd, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2007
Clay B Holroyd, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2007
17
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Gary Aston-Jones, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Bull 2005
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Gary Aston-Jones, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Bull 2005
16
16
It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks.
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2007
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2007
15
The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.
Yan Wu, Xiaolin Zhou. Brain Res 2009
Yan Wu, Xiaolin Zhou. Brain Res 2009
15
Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor.
William H Alexander, Joshua W Brown. Nat Neurosci 2011
William H Alexander, Joshua W Brown. Nat Neurosci 2011
15
A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
Michael P I Becker, Alexander M Nitsch, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Straube. J Neurosci 2014
Michael P I Becker, Alexander M Nitsch, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Straube. J Neurosci 2014
15
Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks.
M Falkenstein, J Hohnsbein, J Hoormann, L Blanke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991
M Falkenstein, J Hohnsbein, J Hoormann, L Blanke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991
14
Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.
Greg Hajcak, Clay B Holroyd, Jason S Moser, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2005
Greg Hajcak, Clay B Holroyd, Jason S Moser, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2005
14
Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.
Clay B Holroyd, Jeff T Larsen, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychophysiology 2004
Clay B Holroyd, Jeff T Larsen, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychophysiology 2004
13
Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
Christian Bellebaum, Irene Daum. Eur J Neurosci 2008
Christian Bellebaum, Irene Daum. Eur J Neurosci 2008
13
The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
Clay B Holroyd, Greg Hajcak, Jeff T Larsen. Brain Res 2006
Clay B Holroyd, Greg Hajcak, Jeff T Larsen. Brain Res 2006
13
Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations.
Flavio T P Oliveira, John J McDonald, David Goodman. J Cogn Neurosci 2007
Flavio T P Oliveira, John J McDonald, David Goodman. J Cogn Neurosci 2007
13
Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: a combined ERP and fMRI study.
Joshua M Carlson, Dan Foti, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Greg Hajcak. Neuroimage 2011
Joshua M Carlson, Dan Foti, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Greg Hajcak. Neuroimage 2011
13
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
13
The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex.
Nicola K Ferdinand, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray, William J Gehring. J Neurosci 2012
Nicola K Ferdinand, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray, William J Gehring. J Neurosci 2012
13
On the number of trials needed for a stable feedback-related negativity.
Josep Marco-Pallares, David Cucurell, Thomas F Münte, Nadine Strien, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells. Psychophysiology 2011
Josep Marco-Pallares, David Cucurell, Thomas F Münte, Nadine Strien, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells. Psychophysiology 2011
13
The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
Luisa Kreussel, Johannes Hewig, Nora Kretschmer, Holger Hecht, Michael G H Coles, Wolfgang H R Miltner. Psychophysiology 2012
Luisa Kreussel, Johannes Hewig, Nora Kretschmer, Holger Hecht, Michael G H Coles, Wolfgang H R Miltner. Psychophysiology 2012
15
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.
Markus Ullsperger, Claudia Danielmeier, Gerhard Jocham. Physiol Rev 2014
Markus Ullsperger, Claudia Danielmeier, Gerhard Jocham. Physiol Rev 2014
12
Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control.
James F Cavanagh, Michael J Frank. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
James F Cavanagh, Michael J Frank. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
12
Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring.
Stefan Debener, Markus Ullsperger, Markus Siegel, Katja Fiehler, D Yves von Cramon, Andreas K Engel. J Neurosci 2005
Stefan Debener, Markus Ullsperger, Markus Siegel, Katja Fiehler, D Yves von Cramon, Andreas K Engel. J Neurosci 2005
12
Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study.
Yue Leng, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
Yue Leng, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
11
Mediofrontal event-related potentials in response to positive, negative and unsigned prediction errors.
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Neuropsychologia 2014
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Neuropsychologia 2014
28
Principal components analysis of reward prediction errors in a reinforcement learning task.
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Neuroimage 2016
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Neuroimage 2016
29
Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring.
Markus Ullsperger, Adrian G Fischer, Roland Nigbur, Tanja Endrass. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
Markus Ullsperger, Adrian G Fischer, Roland Nigbur, Tanja Endrass. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
10
Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity.
Jennifer N Bress, Greg Hajcak. Psychophysiology 2013
Jennifer N Bress, Greg Hajcak. Psychophysiology 2013
10
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.
G Gratton, M G Coles, E Donchin. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983
G Gratton, M G Coles, E Donchin. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983
10
Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals.
Clay B Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Nick Yeung, Leigh Nystrom, Rogier B Mars, Michael G H Coles, Jonathan D Cohen. Nat Neurosci 2004
Clay B Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Nick Yeung, Leigh Nystrom, Rogier B Mars, Michael G H Coles, Jonathan D Cohen. Nat Neurosci 2004
10
Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task.
René San Martín, Facundo Manes, Esteban Hurtado, Pablo Isla, Agustín Ibañez. Neuroimage 2010
René San Martín, Facundo Manes, Esteban Hurtado, Pablo Isla, Agustín Ibañez. Neuroimage 2010
9
Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.
Edward M Bernat, Lindsay D Nelson, Arielle R Baskin-Sommers. Psychophysiology 2015
Edward M Bernat, Lindsay D Nelson, Arielle R Baskin-Sommers. Psychophysiology 2015
14
How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't).
Steven J Luck, Nicholas Gaspelin. Psychophysiology 2017
Steven J Luck, Nicholas Gaspelin. Psychophysiology 2017
9
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.