A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Robert Klitzman, Brigitte Buquez, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2014
Times Cited: 22







List of co-cited articles
137 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
77

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
254
54

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
50

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
218
40

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Cameron R Waldman, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Erik Parens, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2014
47
36

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
477
31

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
306
31

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
159
31


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
286
22

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
214
22


Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
87
22

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
115
22

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
936
22

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
18

Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
153
18

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
18

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
35
18

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
138
18

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
89
18

Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
Nancy R Downing, Janet K Williams, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Christian M Simon. Patient Educ Couns 2013
41
18

Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.
Conrad V Fernandez, Caron Strahlendorf, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Colleen O'Connell, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Kym Boycott, Poul H Sorensen. Genet Med 2013
37
18

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
122
18

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
109
18

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J Med Genet 2014
40
18


Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
18

Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.
Ingrid A Holm, Sarah K Savage, Robert C Green, Eric Juengst, Amy McGuire, Susan Kornetsky, Stephanie J Brewster, Steven Joffe, Patrick Taylor. Genet Med 2014
41
18

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
37
18



Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
132
18


Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati, Anne Marie Tassé. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
72
18

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
18

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
131
18

Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014
74
18

Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Yuan Zhang, Jo Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2015
14
28

Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records.
Sara L Van Driest, Quinn S Wells, Sarah Stallings, William S Bush, Adam Gordon, Deborah A Nickerson, Jerry H Kim, David R Crosslin, Gail P Jarvik, David S Carrell,[...]. JAMA 2016
117
18

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
13

The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.
Isaac S Kohane, Daniel R Masys, Russ B Altman. JAMA 2006
216
13





Researcher and institutional review board chair perspectives on incidental findings in genomic research.
Janet K Williams, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Nancy Downing, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Christian Simon. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012
27
13

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
58
13


Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
156
13


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.