A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Seiji Tanabe, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurophysiol 2014
Times Cited: 10







List of co-cited articles
54 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.
Seiji Tanabe, Ralf M Haefner, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurosci 2011
24
80


A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images.
Jenny C A Read, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming. Vis Neurosci 2002
62
60



Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.
Jenny C A Read, Bruce G Cumming. Nat Neurosci 2007
56
50




Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.
S J D Prince, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
129
40

Cooperative computation of stereo disparity.
D Marr, T Poggio. Science 1976
361
40

Matching and correlation computations in stereoscopic depth perception.
Takahiro Doi, Seiji Tanabe, Ichiro Fujita. J Vis 2011
53
40



A computational theory of human stereo vision.
D Marr, T Poggio. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1979
507
30


Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells.
A Anzai, I Ohzawa, R D Freeman. J Neurophysiol 1999
116
30

Recurrent connectivity can account for the dynamics of disparity processing in V1.
Jason M Samonds, Brian R Potetz, Christopher W Tyler, Tai Sing Lee. J Neurosci 2013
17
30







Disparity processing in primary visual cortex.
Sid Henriksen, Seiji Tanabe, Bruce Cumming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016
14
30

Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2014
48
30

"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
36
30

Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque V1: the role of global and tuned suppression.
Dario L Ringach, Michael J Hawken, Robert Shapley. J Neurophysiol 2003
98
30

Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
Paul B Hibbard, Kenneth C Scott-Brown, Emma C Haigh, Melanie Adrain. PLoS One 2014
13
20



Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.
Heather R Filippini, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2009
53
20

Multivoxel pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain.
Tim J Preston, Sheng Li, Zoe Kourtzi, Andrew E Welchman. J Neurosci 2008
104
20


Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.
I Ohzawa, G C DeAngelis, R D Freeman. J Neurophysiol 1997
154
20

Effects of generalized pooling on binocular disparity selectivity of neurons in the early visual cortex.
Daisuke Kato, Mika Baba, Kota S Sasaki, Izumi Ohzawa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016
4
50

A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination.
C Blakemore, A Fiorentini, L Maffei. J Physiol 1972
129
20

Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
100
20

Encoding of three-dimensional surface slant in cat visual areas 17 and 18.
Takahisa M Sanada, Izumi Ohzawa. J Neurophysiol 2006
14
20






Receptive fields of disparity-tuned simple cells in macaque V1.
Doris Y Tsao, Bevil R Conway, Margaret S Livingstone. Neuron 2003
43
20

The physiology of stereopsis.
B G Cumming, G C DeAngelis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
247
20

Binocular vision.
Randolph Blake, Hugh Wilson. Vision Res 2011
105
20


Distribution of independent components of binocular natural images.
David William Hunter, Paul B Hibbard. J Vis 2015
13
20

Natural image statistics and neural representation.
E P Simoncelli, B A Olshausen. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
954
20


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.