A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
18 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



The Satisfaction With Life Scale.
E Diener, R A Emmons, R J Larsen, S Griffin. J Pers Assess 1985
57

Loneliness among older adults in The Netherlands, Italy, and Canada: a multifaceted comparison.
Theo van Tilburg, Betty Havens, Jenny de Jong Gierveld. Can J Aging 2004
39
57


Older adult loneliness: myths and realities.
Pearl A Dykstra. Eur J Ageing 2009
153
42


[Emotional experience and regulation across the adult lifespan: comparative analysis in three age groups].
María Márquez-González, María Izal Fernández de Trocóniz, Ignacio Montorio Cerrato, Andrés Losada Baltar. Psicothema 2008
11
28

Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
L L Carstensen, D M Isaacowitz, S T Charles. Am Psychol 1999
28

How can I connect with thee? Let me count the ways.
Louise C Hawkley, Michael W Browne, John T Cacioppo. Psychol Sci 2005
75
28

Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
Li Cai, Albert Maydeu-Olivares, Donna L Coffman, David Thissen. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2006
47
28

The oldest old, ADL, social network, and loneliness.
M Bondevik, A Skogstad. West J Nurs Res 1998
70
28


Social contacts and their relationship to loneliness among aged people - a population-based study.
Pirkko E Routasalo, Niina Savikko, Reijo S Tilvis, Timo E Strandberg, Kaisu H Pitkälä. Gerontology 2006
161
28

Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses.
Louise C Hawkley, Ronald A Thisted, John T Cacioppo. Health Psychol 2009
218
28

Loneliness and the health of older people.
Conor O Luanaigh, Brian A Lawlor. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008
255
28

Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
John T Cacioppo, Mary Elizabeth Hughes, Linda J Waite, Louise C Hawkley, Ronald A Thisted. Psychol Aging 2006
729
28

Validation of the Chinese translation of the 6-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale in elderly Chinese.
Grace Tak Yu Leung, Jenny de Jong Gierveld, Linda Chiu Wa Lam. Int Psychogeriatr 2008
42
28

Translation and Validation of the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale Among Older Migrants Living in the Netherlands.
Özgül Uysal-Bozkir, Tineke Fokkema, Janet L MacNeil-Vroomen, Theo G van Tilburg, Sophia E de Rooij. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2017
10
28


Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.
J A Yesavage, T L Brink, T L Rose, O Lum, V Huang, M Adey, V O Leirer. J Psychiatr Res 1982
14

Age-group differences in facets of positive and negative affect.
R E Ready, J G Vaidya, D Watson, R D Latzman, E A Koffel, L A Clark. Aging Ment Health 2011
18
14

Time-to-death-related change in positive and negative affect among older adults approaching the end of life.
Nina Vogel, Oliver K Schilling, Hans-Werner Wahl, Aartjan T F Beekman, Brenda W J H Penninx. Psychol Aging 2013
31
14


Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span.
L L Carstensen, M Pasupathi, U Mayr, J R Nesselroade. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000
575
14




Emotional complexity and emotional well-being in older adults: risks of high neuroticism.
Rebecca E Ready, Anna M Åkerstedt, Daniel K Mroczek. Aging Ment Health 2012
17
14


Psychometric properties of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) original and short forms in an African American community sample.
Erin L Merz, Vanessa L Malcarne, Scott C Roesch, Celine M Ko, Marc Emerson, Vincenzo G Roma, Georgia Robins Sadler. J Affect Disord 2013
36
14

Fewer ups and downs: daily stressors mediate age differences in negative affect.
Susan Turk Charles, Gloria Luong, David M Almeida, Carol Ryff, Maggie Sturm, Gayle Love. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010
40
14



Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts.
B Mesquita. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001
74
14

Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).
Antonio Terracciano, Robert R McCrae, Paul T Costa. Eur J Psychol Assess 2003
159
14

The positive and negative affect schedule: psychometric properties of the korean version.
Young-Jin Lim, Bum-Hee Yu, Doh-Kwan Kim, Ji-Hae Kim. Psychiatry Investig 2010
12
14


Toward a consensual structure of mood.
D Watson, A Tellegen. Psychol Bull 1985
14

A bifactor model of negative affectivity: fear and distress components among younger and older youth.
Chad Ebesutani, Ashley Smith, Adam Bernstein, Bruce F Chorpita, Charmaine Higa-McMillan, Brad Nakamura. Psychol Assess 2011
27
14


Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years.
S T Charles, C A Reynolds, M Gatz. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001
391
14

Positive and negative affect schedule: psychometric properties for the Brazilian Portuguese version.
Pedro Pires, Alberto Filgueiras, Rodolfo Ribas, Cristina Santana. Span J Psychol 2013
11
14

FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model.
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva, Pere J Ferrando. Behav Res Methods 2006
327
14


Loneliness in old age in Eastern and Western European societies: theoretical perspectives.
Jenny de Jong Gierveld, Clemens Tesch-Römer. Eur J Ageing 2012
22
14

[Validity and reliability of the Duke-UNC-11 questionnaire of functional social support].
J A Bellón Saameño, A Delgado Sánchez, J D Luna del Castillo, P Lardelli Claret. Aten Primaria 1996
108
14

Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.
Todd D Little, Mijke Rhemtulla, Kimberly Gibson, Alexander M Schoemann. Psychol Methods 2013
246
14


From social structural factors to perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness: the Chicago health, aging, and social relations study.
Louise C Hawkley, Mary Elizabeth Hughes, Linda J Waite, Christopher M Masi, Ronald A Thisted, John T Cacioppo. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008
180
14



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.