A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Karina L Brierley, Danielle C Bonadies, Anne Moyer, Ellen T Matloff. Fam Cancer 2014
Times Cited: 2







List of co-cited articles
1 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
40
100

Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider.
Burcu F Darst, Lisa Madlensky, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol, Cinnamon S Bloss. Health Commun 2014
23
50



Gatekeepers or intermediaries? The role of clinicians in commercial genomic testing.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Richard A Settersten, Marcie A Lambrix, Eric T Juengst. PLoS One 2014
23
50

The incorporation of predictive genomic testing into genetic counseling programs.
Ryan Noss, Rachel Mills, Nancy Callanan. J Genet Couns 2014
2
50

Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.
Robert J Reid, Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Cristofer Price, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody, Eric B Larson. Genet Med 2012
30
50

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2009
87
50

Academic family physicians' perception of genetic testing and integration into practice: a CERA study.
Arch G Mainous, Sharleen P Johnson, Svetlana Chirina, Richard Baker. Fam Med 2013
33
50

Variations in predicted risks in personal genome testing for common complex diseases.
Rachel R J Kalf, Raluca Mihaescu, Suman Kundu, Peter de Knijff, Robert C Green, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet Med 2014
42
50

Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.
S B Haga, W T Barry, R Mills, L Svetkey, S Suchindran, H F Willard, G S Ginsburg. Public Health Genomics 2014
17
50

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
50

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
152
50

Self diagnosis of Lynch syndrome using direct to consumer genetic testing: a case study.
Maegan E Roberts, Douglas L Riegert-Johnson, Brittany C Thomas. J Genet Couns 2011
13
50

Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.
Effy Vayena, Christian Ineichen, Elia Stoupka, Ernst Hafen. Public Health Genomics 2014
19
50

Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.
Sarah E Gollust, Benjamin S Wilfond, Sara Chandros Hull. Genet Med 2003
86
50

ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.
Kathy Hudson, Gail Javitt, Wylie Burke, Peter Byers. Obstet Gynecol 2007
85
50

Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing for age-related macular degeneration.
Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk, Najaf Amin, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M van Duijn, Johannes R Vingerling, Caroline C W Klaver. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014
9
50

Physicians' opinion for 'new' genetic testing in Japan.
Takako Ohata, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Maiko Watanabe, Tomohisa Sumida, Fumio Takada. J Hum Genet 2009
23
50

Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis.
K A B Goddard, J Robitaille, N F Dowling, A R Parrado, J Fishman, L A Bradley, C A Moore, M J Khoury. Public Health Genomics 2009
30
50

Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates.
Lila J Finney Rutten, Sarah E Gollust, Sana Naveed, Richard P Moser. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012
30
50

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
69
50

An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
A Cecile Jw Janssens, Cornelia M van Duijn. Investig Genet 2010
33
50




Autobiologies on YouTube: Narratives of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Anna Harris, Susan E Kelly, Sally Wyatt. New Genet Soc 2014
9
50

Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.
Susanne B Haga, Madeline M Carrig, Julianne M O'Daniel, Lori A Orlando, Ley A Killeya-Jones, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Alex Cho. J Gen Intern Med 2011
56
50

"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.
Erynn S Gordon, Georgia Griffin, Lisa Wawak, Hauchie Pang, Sarah E Gollust, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2012
47
50



CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies.
Andrew D Johnson, Anupama Bhimavarapu, Emelia J Benjamin, Caroline Fox, Daniel Levy, Gail P Jarvik, Christopher J O'Donnell. Genet Med 2010
16
50

Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Monica A Giovanni, Matthew R Fickie, Lisa S Lehmann, Robert C Green, Lisa M Meckley, David Veenstra, Michael F Murray. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010
38
50

Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
John Lynch, Ashley Parrott, Robert J Hopkin, Melanie Myers. J Genet Couns 2011
13
50

Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.
Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet Med 2010
68
50

Translational Genomic Research: Protocol Development and Initial Outcomes following SNP Testing for Colon Cancer Risk.
Rachel Nusbaum, Kara-Grace Leventhal, Gillian W Hooker, Beth N Peshkin, Morgan Butrick, Yasmin Salehizadeh, William Tuong, Susan Eggly, Jeena Mathew, David Goerlitz,[...]. Transl Behav Med 2013
18
50

Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
347
50

A family experience of personal genomics.
Manuel Corpas. J Genet Couns 2012
13
50



An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
Gemma R Brett, Sylvia A Metcalfe, David J Amor, Jane L Halliday. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
36
50

Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans.
Raluca Mihaescu, Mandy van Hoek, Eric J G Sijbrands, André G Uitterlinden, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet Med 2009
51
50

Quality of online pharmacies and websites selling prescription drugs: a systematic review.
Grazia Orizio, Anna Merla, Peter J Schulz, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2011
67
50

Nutritional supplements for diabetes sold on the internet: business or health promotion?
Loredana Covolo, Michela Capelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Donatella Feretti, Luigi Caimi, Umberto Gelatti. BMC Public Health 2013
5
50


Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Ryan S Paquin, Adam S Richards, Laura M Koehly, Colleen M McBride. Transl Behav Med 2012
1
100


Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
112
50

Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services.
Kenta Imai, Larry J Kricka, Paolo Fortina. Clin Chem 2011
44
50



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.