A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
113 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.
Patricia Birch, S Adam, N Bansback, R R Coe, J Hicklin, A Lehman, K C Li, J M Friedman. J Genet Couns 2016
17
47

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
19

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
669
19

A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
325
15

Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.
Michael J Green, Susan K Peterson, Maria Wagner Baker, Gregory R Harper, Lois C Friedman, Wendy S Rubinstein, David T Mauger. JAMA 2004
203
15

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Nananda F Col, Carol L Bennett, Michael J Barry, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson,[...]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014
15

Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Holly K Tabor, Jacquie Stock, Tracy Brazg, Margaret J McMillin, Karin M Dent, Joon-Ho Yu, Jay Shendure, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2012
79
15



Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.
Denise M Lautenbach, Kurt D Christensen, Jeffrey A Sparks, Robert C Green. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013
78
15

The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.
Yvonne Bombard, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Selina Casalino, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan Schrader, Michael Evans, Adena Scheer, Nancy Baxter,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
13
30

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
19
21

Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.
Patricia McCarthy Veach, Dianne M Bartels, Bonnie S Leroy. J Genet Couns 2007
119
11

Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu, Richard Person, Yan Ding, Patricia Ward, Alicia Braxton, Min Wang, Christian Buhay,[...]. JAMA 2014
724
11


Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
49
11

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
114
11

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
113
11

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
201
11

Whole exome and whole genome sequencing.
David Bick, David Dimmock. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011
85
11

Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.
K A Kaphingst, F M Facio, M-R Cheng, S Brooks, H Eidem, A Linn, B B Biesecker, L G Biesecker. Clin Genet 2012
72
11



Supporting Parental Decisions About Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: The NC NEXUS Decision Aid.
Megan A Lewis, Ryan S Paquin, Myra I Roche, Robert D Furberg, Christine Rini, Jonathan S Berg, Cynthia M Powell, Donald B Bailey. Pediatrics 2016
23
13

Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: a randomized controlled trial.
Miriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton, Elena Gates, Steven E Gregorich, Lee A Learman, Sanae Nakagawa, Vickie A Feldstein, James Lewis, A Eugene Washington, Robert F Nease. Obstet Gynecol 2009
50
11

Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.
Rachel Mills, Susanne B Haga. J Genet Couns 2014
18
16

Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.
Tara J Schmidlen, Lisa Wawak, Rachel Kasper, J Felipe García-España, Michael F Christman, Erynn S Gordon. J Genet Couns 2014
24
12

Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.
S B Haga, W T Barry, R Mills, L Svetkey, S Suchindran, H F Willard, G S Ginsburg. Public Health Genomics 2014
15
20

Models of service delivery for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling.
Angela M Trepanier, Dawn C Allain. J Genet Couns 2014
39
11

The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study.
Susan Michie, Elizabeth Dormandy, Theresa M Marteau. Patient Educ Couns 2002
153
11

Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
A M O'Connor. Med Decis Making 1995
11

Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.
Adam H Buchanan, Santanu K Datta, Celette Sugg Skinner, Gail P Hollowell, Henry F Beresford, Thomas Freeland, Benjamin Rogers, John Boling, P Kelly Marcom, Martha B Adams. J Genet Couns 2015
62
11

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
11

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson,[...]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017
835
11


Evaluation of a decision aid for incidental genomic results, the Genomics ADvISER: protocol for a mixed methods randomised controlled trial.
Salma Shickh, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Selina Casalino, Esha Joshi, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan A Schrader, Adena Scheer, Christine Elser, Seema Panchal,[...]. BMJ Open 2018
12
25

Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public.
Saskia C Sanderson, Sabrina A Suckiel, Micol Zweig, Erwin P Bottinger, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Lynne D Richardson. Genet Med 2016
29
11

Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.
Joel E Pacyna, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Sarah M Jenkins, Erica J Sutton, Caroline Horrow, Iftikhar J Kullo, Richard R Sharp. J Med Genet 2019
9
33


Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts, L Adrienne Cupples, Norman R Relkin, Peter J Whitehouse, Tamsen Brown, Susan LaRusse Eckert, Melissa Butson, A Dessa Sadovnick, Kimberly A Quaid,[...]. N Engl J Med 2009
281
7

Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors.
Beth Anderson, Jennifer McLosky, Elizabeth Wasilevich, Sarah Lyon-Callo, Debra Duquette, Glenn Copeland. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012
55
7

Evaluating a unique, specialist psychiatric genetic counseling clinic: uptake and impact.
A Inglis, D Koehn, B McGillivray, S E Stewart, J Austin. Clin Genet 2015
54
7

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures.
Katherine Payne, Stuart Nicholls, Marion McAllister, Rhona Macleod, Dian Donnai, Linda M Davies. Value Health 2008
68
7

Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach.
Christopher R Wolfe, Valerie F Reyna, Colin L Widmer, Elizabeth M Cedillos, Christopher R Fisher, Priscila G Brust-Renck, Audrey M Weil. Med Decis Making 2015
36
7

Communicating risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer with an interactive decision support tool.
Douglas J Rupert, Linda B Squiers, Jeanette M Renaud, Nedra S Whitehead, Roger J Osborn, Robert D Furberg, Claudia M Squire, Janice P Tzeng. Patient Educ Couns 2013
13
15


Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Erik Parens, Cameron R Waldman, Robert Klitzman, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Hastings Cent Rep 2014
45
7

Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era.
Gillian W Hooker, Kelly E Ormond, Kevin Sweet, Barbara B Biesecker. J Genet Couns 2014
40
7


Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014
63
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.