A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. J Med Ethics 2015
Times Cited: 69







List of co-cited articles
366 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
26

What is the clinical utility of genetic testing?
Scott D Grosse, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2006
182
23

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information.
Morris W Foster, John J Mulvihill, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2009
128
20

Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.
Jennefer N Kohler, Erin Turbitt, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
67
20

Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study.
J N Kohler, E Turbitt, K L Lewis, B S Wilfond, L Jamal, H L Peay, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2017
42
26

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
133
11

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
51
13

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
257
10

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
87
10

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
116
10


Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.
Leslie G Biesecker, Robert C Green. N Engl J Med 2014
356
8


Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
63
9

Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap.
Scott D Grosse, Colleen M McBride, James P Evans, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2009
58
10

Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests.
Jeffrey R Botkin, Steven M Teutsch, Celia I Kaye, Maxine Hayes, James E Haddow, Linda A Bradley, Kathleen Szegda, W David Dotson. Genet Med 2010
65
9

Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
105
7

Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
352
7

Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.
David T Miller, Margaret P Adam, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie G Biesecker, Arthur R Brothman, Nigel P Carter, Deanna M Church, John A Crolla, Evan E Eichler, Charles J Epstein,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2010
7



Public perceptions of disease severity but not actionability correlate with interest in receiving genomic results: nonalignment with current trends in practice.
Kristi D Graves, Pamela S Sinicrope, Jennifer B McCormick, Yingjun Zhou, Susan T Vadaparampil, Noralane M Lindor. Public Health Genomics 2015
19
26

Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
238
7

Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.
R Z Hayeems, R Babul-Hirji, N Hoang, R Weksberg, C Shuman. J Genet Couns 2016
27
18

Was it worth it? Patients' perspectives on the perceived value of genomic-based individualized medicine.
Colin Me Halverson, Kristin E Clift, Jennifer B McCormick. J Community Genet 2016
31
16

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
131
7

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
7

Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Katie L Lewis, Gillian W Hooker, Philip D Connors, Travis C Hyams, Martha F Wright, Samantha Caldwell, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2016
47
10

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
947
7

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
7

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
70
5

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
479
5

Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Jeffrey G Reid, Matthew N Bainbridge, Alecia Willis, Patricia A Ward, Alicia Braxton, Joke Beuten, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu,[...]. N Engl J Med 2013
5

Genetic tests: clinical validity and clinical utility.
Wylie Burke. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2014
55
7


Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings.
Laurel K Willig, Josh E Petrikin, Laurie D Smith, Carol J Saunders, Isabelle Thiffault, Neil A Miller, Sarah E Soden, Julie A Cakici, Suzanne M Herd, Greyson Twist,[...]. Lancet Respir Med 2015
211
5

Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here.
Teri A Manolio, Rex L Chisholm, Brad Ozenberger, Dan M Roden, Marc S Williams, Richard Wilson, David Bick, Erwin P Bottinger, Murray H Brilliant, Charis Eng,[...]. Genet Med 2013
351
5


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
287
5

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
46
8

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
5

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
5

Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.
E Vayena, E Gourna, J Streuli, E Hafen, B Prainsack. Public Health Genomics 2012
37
10

Patients' perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project.
Philip J Lupo, Jill O Robinson, Pamela M Diamond, Leila Jamal, Heather E Danysh, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Jason L Vassy, Kurt D Christensen, Robert C Green,[...]. Per Med 2016
25
16

Parents' interest in whole-genome sequencing of newborns.
Aaron J Goldenberg, Daniel S Dodson, Matthew M Davis, Beth A Tarini. Genet Med 2014
58
6

Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests.
Patrick M M Bossuyt, Johannes B Reitsma, Kristian Linnet, Karel G M Moons. Clin Chem 2012
189
5

Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.
Matthew Wai Heng Chung, Joseph Chi Fung Ng. J Med Ethics 2016
8
50

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Robert C Green. Public Health Genomics 2017
67
5

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
67
5

Beyond clinical utility: The multiple values of DTC genetics.
Mauro Turrini, Barbara Prainsack. Appl Transl Genom 2016
20
20


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.