A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

E Kleiderman, D Avard, A Besso, S Ali-Khan, G Sauvageau, J H├ębert. Clin Genet 2015
Times Cited: 11







List of co-cited articles
80 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
72

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
236
45

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
45

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
82
45

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
57
36

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
50
36

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
110
36

Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results.
Rachel B Ramoni, Amy L McGuire, Jill Oliver Robinson, Debra S Morley, Sharon E Plon, Steven Joffe. Genet Med 2013
36
36

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
86
36

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
281
36


Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
63
36

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
27



Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
55
27

Attitudes of patients with cancer about personalized medicine and somatic genetic testing.
Stacy W Gray, Katherine Hicks-Courant, Christopher S Lathan, Levi Garraway, Elyse R Park, Jane C Weeks. J Oncol Pract 2012
78
27

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
27

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
213
27

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
27


Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
268
27

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
814
27


Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
53
27

Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
Meredith C Meacham, Helene Starks, Wylie Burke, Kelly Edwards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
48
27

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Cameron R Waldman, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Erik Parens, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2014
46
27

Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings.
Amy L McGuire, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ma'n H Zawati, Ellen Wright Clayton. Genome Res 2014
19
18


Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive?
Sarah N Boers, Johannes J M van Delden, Nine V Knoers, Annelien L Bredenoord. Trends Mol Med 2015
16
18



Genetics researchers' and IRB professionals' attitudes toward genetic research review: a comparative analysis.
Karen L Edwards, Amy A Lemke, Susan B Trinidad, Susan M Lewis, Helene Starks, Katherine W Snapinn, Mary Quinn Griffin, Georgia L Wiesner, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2012
27
18

Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
149
18

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
158
18

Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here.
Teri A Manolio, Rex L Chisholm, Brad Ozenberger, Dan M Roden, Marc S Williams, Richard Wilson, David Bick, Erwin P Bottinger, Murray H Brilliant, Charis Eng,[...]. Genet Med 2013
335
18


Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing.
Zoe Lohn, Shelin Adam, Patricia Birch, Anne Townsend, Jan Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2013
43
18

Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
Nancy R Downing, Janet K Williams, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Christian M Simon. Patient Educ Couns 2013
41
18

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
18

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
36
18


Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
220
18

Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in.
Maren T Scheuner, Jane Peredo, Judith Benkendorf, Bruce Bowdish, Gerald Feldman, Lynn Fleisher, John J Mulvihill, Michael Watson, Gail E Herman, James Evans. Genet Med 2015
36
18

Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu, Richard Person, Yan Ding, Patricia Ward, Alicia Braxton, Min Wang, Christian Buhay,[...]. JAMA 2014
798
18

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing.
Kelly Hitch, Galen Joseph, Jenna Guiltinan, Jessica Kianmahd, Janey Youngblom, Amie Blanco. J Genet Couns 2014
45
18

The cost-effectiveness of returning incidental findings from next-generation genomic sequencing.
Caroline S Bennette, Carlos J Gallego, Wylie Burke, Gail P Jarvik, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2015
66
18

Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.
Sophia B Hufnagel, Lisa J Martin, Amy Cassedy, Robert J Hopkin, Armand H Matheny Antommaria. Am J Med Genet A 2016
17
18

Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Jeffrey G Reid, Matthew N Bainbridge, Alecia Willis, Patricia A Ward, Alicia Braxton, Joke Beuten, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu,[...]. N Engl J Med 2013
18

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
74
18


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.