A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Tanya Agurs-Collins, Rebecca Ferrer, Allison Ottenbacher, Erika A Waters, Mary E O'Connell, Jada G Hamilton. J Cancer Educ 2015
Times Cited: 32







List of co-cited articles
130 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates.
Lila J Finney Rutten, Sarah E Gollust, Sana Naveed, Richard P Moser. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012
30
20

Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.
Diana S Catz, Nancy S Green, Jonathan N Tobin, Michele A Lloyd-Puryear, Penny Kyler, Ann Umemoto, Jennifer Cernoch, Roxane Brown, Fredericka Wolman. Community Genet 2005
109
15

Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing: the 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys.
Phuong L Mai, Susan Thomas Vadaparampil, Nancy Breen, Timothy S McNeel, Louise Wideroff, Barry I Graubard. Am J Prev Med 2014
71
15

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet Med 2010
89
15

Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.
Eleanor Singer, Toni Antonucci, John Van Hoewyk. Genet Test 2004
121
12

Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.
Aisha T Langford, Ken Resnicow, J Scott Roberts, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher. J Genet Couns 2012
26
15


Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice.
Katherine Kolor, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Joan Foland, Beth Anderson, Rebecca Giles, Jennifer Wrathall, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2012
31
12

Racial differences in attitudes toward personalized medicine.
V A Diaz, A G Mainous, J K Gavin, D Wilson. Public Health Genomics 2014
16
25

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
84
12

Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing.
Susanne B Haga, William T Barry, Rachel Mills, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Laura Svetkey, Jennifer Sullivan, Huntington F Willard. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013
134
12

Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.
Katie E J Hann, Madeleine Freeman, Lindsay Fraser, Jo Waller, Saskia C Sanderson, Belinda Rahman, Lucy Side, Sue Gessler, Anne Lanceley. BMC Public Health 2017
88
12

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
114
9



Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.
Douglas F Easton, Paul D P Pharoah, Antonis C Antoniou, Marc Tischkowitz, Sean V Tavtigian, Katherine L Nathanson, Peter Devilee, Alfons Meindl, Fergus J Couch, Melissa Southey,[...]. N Engl J Med 2015
502
9

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
223
9

How Well Do Customers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing Services Comprehend Genetic Test Results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.
Jenny E Ostergren, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Sarah S Kalia, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Joanna L Mountain, Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts. Public Health Genomics 2015
46
9

What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report.
Belen Hurle, Toby Citrin, Jean F Jenkins, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Neil Lamb, Jo Ellen Roseman, Vence L Bonham. Genet Med 2013
60
9


Age differences in genetic knowledge, health literacy and causal beliefs for health conditions.
S Ashida, M Goodman, C Pandya, L M Koehly, C Lachance, J Stafford, K A Kaphingst. Public Health Genomics 2011
59
9

Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes.
Judy E Garber, Kenneth Offit. J Clin Oncol 2005
325
9


Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.
Jennifer M Taber, Christine Q Chang, Tram K Lam, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Jada G Hamilton, Sheri D Schully. Public Health Genomics 2015
16
18

Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Dawn Provenzale, Samir Gupta, Dennis J Ahnen, Travis Bray, Jamie A Cannon, Gregory Cooper, Donald S David, Dayna S Early, Deborah Erwin, James M Ford,[...]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016
120
9

Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Marc D Schwartz, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Beth N Peshkin, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Rachel Nusbaum, An-Tsun Huang, Yaojen Chang, Kristi Graves, Claudine Isaacs, Marie Wood,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2014
159
9



Racial and ethnic disparities in awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk.
José A Pagán, Dejun Su, Lifeng Li, Katrina Armstrong, David A Asch. Am J Prev Med 2009
68
9

Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Jenny Johnson, Ann Annis-Emeott, Patrick W Lee, Mary Pat Bland, Karen L Edwards, Kristin Oehlke, Rebecca T Giles,[...]. Am J Public Health 2009
36
9


Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.
Jada G Hamilton, Ekland Abdiwahab, Heather M Edwards, Min-Lin Fang, Andrew Jdayani, Erica S Breslau. J Gen Intern Med 2017
50
9

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Gareth J Hollands, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Sarah King, Theresa M Marteau. BMJ 2016
244
9

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
60
9

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.
Kimberly A Kaphingst, Colleen M McBride, Christopher Wade, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert Reid, Eric Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2012
86
9

Transforming Cancer Prevention through Precision Medicine and Immune-oncology.
Thomas W Kensler, Avrum Spira, Judy E Garber, Eva Szabo, J Jack Lee, Zigang Dong, Andrew J Dannenberg, William N Hait, Elizabeth Blackburn, Nancy E Davidson,[...]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2016
86
9

Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.
Colleen M McBride, Deborah Bowen, Lawrence C Brody, Celeste M Condit, Robert T Croyle, Marta Gwinn, Muin J Khoury, Laura M Koehly, Bruce R Korf, Theresa M Marteau,[...]. Am J Prev Med 2010
105
9

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
9

Using Genetic Technologies To Reduce, Rather Than Widen, Health Disparities.
Caren E Smith, Stephanie M Fullerton, Keith A Dookeran, Heather Hampel, Adrienne Tin, Nisa M Maruthur, Jonathan C Schisler, Jeffrey A Henderson, Katherine L Tucker, José M Ordovás. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016
38
9

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
154
9


Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.
S B Haga, J M O'Daniel, G M Tindall, I R Lipkus, R Agans. Pharmacogenomics J 2012
100
9

Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.
Melinda Krakow, Chelsea L Ratcliff, Bradford W Hesse, Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek. Public Health Genomics 2017
29
10

Trends and Gaps in Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests From 2007 to 2014.
Nate C Apathy, Terri Menser, Lindsay M Keeran, Eric W Ford, Christopher A Harle, Timothy R Huerta. Am J Prev Med 2018
9
33

False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
114
9

Sociocultural variation in attitudes toward use of genetic information and participation in genetic research by race in the United States: implications for precision medicine.
Timothy Dye, Dongmei Li, Margaret Demment, Susan Groth, Diana Fernandez, Ann Dozier, Jack Chang. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016
19
15

Genomics is failing on diversity.
Alice B Popejoy, Stephanie M Fullerton. Nature 2016
573
9

Utilization and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing and Counseling in a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOUT Study.
Joanne Armstrong, Michele Toscano, Nancy Kotchko, Sue Friedman, Marc D Schwartz, Katherine S Virgo, Kristian Lynch, James E Andrews, Claudia X Aguado Loi, Joseph E Bauer,[...]. JAMA Oncol 2015
79
6

Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.
Sharon E Plon, Diana M Eccles, Douglas Easton, William D Foulkes, Maurizio Genuardi, Marc S Greenblatt, Frans B L Hogervorst, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Amanda B Spurdle, Sean V Tavtigian. Hum Mutat 2008
560
6



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.