A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Arne Oetjen, Jesko L Verhey. J Acoust Soc Am 2015
Times Cited: 3







List of co-cited articles
14 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
Joshua G W Bernstein, Golbarg Mehraei, Shihab Shamma, Frederick J Gallun, Sarah M Theodoroff, Marjorie R Leek. J Am Acad Audiol 2013
57
100

Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility.
T Chi, Y Gao, M C Guyton, P Ru, S Shamma. J Acoust Soc Am 1999
156
100

Spectro-temporal modulation subspace-spanning filter bank features for robust automatic speech recognition.
Marc René Schädler, Bernd T Meyer, Birger Kollmeier. J Acoust Soc Am 2012
21
100



A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.
H J Steeneken, T Houtgast. J Acoust Soc Am 1980
249
66

Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
R Drullman, J M Festen, R Plomp. J Acoust Soc Am 1994
376
66

The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility.
Taffeta M Elliott, Frédéric E Theunissen. PLoS Comput Biol 2009
188
66



Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.
Stephan D Ewert, Jesko L Verhey, Torsten Dau. J Acoust Soc Am 2002
49
66




Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech.
Michael A Stone, Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore. J Acoust Soc Am 2012
103
33

Note on informational masking.
Nathaniel I Durlach, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd, Tanya L Arbogast, H Steven Colburn, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham. J Acoust Soc Am 2003
217
33

Gabor analysis of auditory midbrain receptive fields: spectro-temporal and binaural composition.
Anqi Qiu, Christoph E Schreiner, Monty A Escabí. J Neurophysiol 2003
50
33




On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
Michael A Stone, Brian C J Moore. J Acoust Soc Am 2014
44
33

A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
Søren Jørgensen, Stephan D Ewert, Torsten Dau. J Acoust Soc Am 2013
70
33

Contribution of very low amplitude-modulation rates to intelligibility in a competing-speech task (L).
Christian Füllgrabe, Michael A Stone, Brian C J Moore. J Acoust Soc Am 2009
21
33

The masking of speech.
G A MILLER. Psychol Bull 1947
147
33

Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise.
Koenraad S Rhebergen, Niek J Versfeld, Wouter A Dreschler. J Acoust Soc Am 2006
91
33


Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.
M ter Keurs, J M Festen, R Plomp. J Acoust Soc Am 1993
68
33


Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise.
P A Howard-Jones, S Rosen. J Acoust Soc Am 1993
71
33


A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.
Martin Cooke. J Acoust Soc Am 2006
279
33


Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
Christian Füllgrabe, Frédéric Berthommier, Christian Lorenzi. Hear Res 2006
88
33


Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Peggy B Nelson, Su-Hyun Jin, Arlene Earley Carney, David A Nelson. J Acoust Soc Am 2003
222
33




Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity.
T M van Veen, T Houtgast. J Acoust Soc Am 1985
28
33



Temporal symmetry in primary auditory cortex: implications for cortical connectivity.
Jonathan Z Simon, Didier A Depireux, David J Klein, Jonathan B Fritz, Shihab A Shamma. Neural Comput 2007
24
33






Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus.
Nima Mesgarani, Connie Cheung, Keith Johnson, Edward F Chang. Science 2014
347
33

Phoneme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex.
Nima Mesgarani, Stephen V David, Jonathan B Fritz, Shihab A Shamma. J Acoust Soc Am 2008
96
33



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.