A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Marilyn E Coors, Kristen M Raymond, Shannon K McWilliams, Christian J Hopfer, Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson. Psychiatr Genet 2015
Times Cited: 7







List of co-cited articles
118 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.
Ingrid A Holm, Brittany R Iles, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Sarah K Savage, Kurt D Christensen, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
14
71


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
204
57

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
124
57

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
56
57

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
51
57

Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
33
42

The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Phoebe L Bacon, Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Sarah K Savage, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
17
42

The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome.
A Haukkala, E Kujala, P Alha, V Salomaa, S Koskinen, H Swan, H Kääriäinen. Public Health Genomics 2013
24
42

Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.
Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Kari G Chaffee, Marguerite E Robinson, Deborah R Gordon, Noralane M Lindor, Barbara A Koenig. J Law Med Ethics 2015
21
42


Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya.
Vicki Marsh, Francis Kombe, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Thomas N Williams, Michael Parker, Sassy Molyneux. BMC Med Ethics 2013
26
42

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
42


Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
57
42

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
159
42

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
55
42

Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Kurt D Christensen, Sarah K Savage, Noelle L Huntington, Elissa R Weitzman, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Cara N Cacioppo, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017
11
42

Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.
Consuelo H Wilkins, Brandy M Mapes, Rebecca N Jerome, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Jill M Pulley, Paul A Harris. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019
20
42

What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.
Fiona Alice Miller, Robin Zoe Hayeems, Jessica Peace Bytautas. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
46
42

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
42

Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries.
Elena Salvaterra, Roberto Giorda, Maria T Bassi, Renato Borgatti, Lisbeth E Knudsen, Andrea Martinuzzi, Maria Nobile, Uberto Pozzoli, Gian P Ramelli, Gianl L Reni,[...]. Biopreserv Biobank 2012
16
28


Researchers' opinions towards the communication of results of biobank research: a survey study.
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef J K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Ellen M A Smets. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
13
28

"Still Rather Hazy at Present": Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent.
Gaia Barazzetti, Samuele Cavalli, Lazare Benaroyo, Alain Kaufmann. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017
7
28

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
28

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
28

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
196
28

The Collaborative African Genomics Network (CAfGEN): Applying Genomic technologies to probe host factors important to the progression of HIV and HIV-tuberculosis infection in sub-Saharan Africa.
Gerald Mboowa, Savannah Mwesigwa, Eric Katagirya, Gaone Retshabile, Busisiwe C Mlotshwa, Lesedi Williams, Adeodata Kekitiinwa, David Kateete, Eddie Wampande, Misaki Wayengera,[...]. AAS Open Res 2018
9
28

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
51
28

Research capacity. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa.
Charles Rotimi, Akin Abayomi, Alash'le Abimiku, Victoria May Adabayeri, Clement Adebamowo, Ezekiel Adebiyi, Adebowale D Ademola, Adebowale Adeyemo, Dwomoa Adu, Dissou Affolabi,[...]. Science 2014
215
28

Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups.
Erin Rothwell, Rebecca Anderson, Jeffrey R Botkin. Qual Health Res 2016
26
28

Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
Melinda L Yushak, Gang Han, Sara Bouberhan, Lianne Epstein, Michael P DiGiovanna, Sarah S Mougalian, Tara B Sanft, Maysa M Abu-Khalaf, Gina G Chung, Stacey M Stein,[...]. Cancer 2016
31
28

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
Nicola K Gale, Gemma Heath, Elaine Cameron, Sabina Rashid, Sabi Redwood. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013
28




Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider.
Gaile Renegar, Christopher J Webster, Steffen Stuerzebecher, Lea Harty, Susan E Ide, Beth Balkite, Taryn A Rogalski-Salter, Nadine Cohen, Brian B Spear, Diane M Barnes,[...]. Bioethics 2006
69
28

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
28


Genetic susceptibility testing versus family history-based risk assessment: Impact on perceived risk of Alzheimer disease.
Susan LaRusse, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Heather Katzen, Erin L Linnenbringer, Melissa Barber, Peter Whitehouse, Kimberly Quaid, Tamsen Brown, Robert C Green,[...]. Genet Med 2005
40
28

Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.
Douglas B Pet, Ingrid A Holm, Janet L Williams, Melanie F Myers, Laurie L Novak, Kyle B Brothers, Georgia L Wiesner, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2019
26
28

Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
9
28

What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research?
Colin Me Halverson, Sarah H Jones, Laurie Novak, Christopher Simpson, Digna R Velez Edwards, Sifang Kathy Zhao, Ellen W Clayton. J Pers Med 2020
4
50

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
5
40

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
15
28

Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.
Xuan Zhu, Emma R Leof, Kari G Rabe, Jennifer B McCormick, Gloria M Petersen, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. Public Health Genomics 2018
3
66

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
45
28


Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.
Jonathan Gooblar, Catherine M Roe, Natalie J Selsor, Matthew J Gabel, John C Morris. JAMA Neurol 2015
20
28


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.