A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
Times Cited: 54







List of co-cited articles
334 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
42

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
902
31

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
57
29


"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
122
22

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
114
20

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
75
18

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
61
18


Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
87
16

Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
John F P Bridges, A Brett Hauber, Deborah Marshall, Andrew Lloyd, Lisa A Prosser, Dean A Regier, F Reed Johnson, Josephine Mauskopf. Value Health 2011
881
16

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
16


Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
252
14

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
14

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.
F Reed Johnson, Emily Lancsar, Deborah Marshall, Vikram Kilambi, Axel Mühlbacher, Dean A Regier, Brian W Bresnahan, Barbara Kanninen, John F P Bridges. Value Health 2013
684
14

What are people willing to pay for whole-genome sequencing information, and who decides what they receive?
Deborah A Marshall, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, F Reed Johnson, Karen V MacDonald, Amy Pugh, Michael P Douglas, Kathryn A Phillips. Genet Med 2016
21
38


Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
474
12

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
275
12

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
127
12

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
51
13


Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
66
12

Valuation of Health and Nonhealth Outcomes from Next-Generation Sequencing: Approaches, Challenges, and Solutions.
Dean A Regier, Deirdre Weymann, James Buchanan, Deborah A Marshall, Sarah Wordsworth. Value Health 2018
29
24

The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.
Yvonne Bombard, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Selina Casalino, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan Schrader, Michael Evans, Adena Scheer, Nancy Baxter,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
22
31

Demand for Precision Medicine: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and External Validation Study.
Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra, Anirban Basu, Josh J Carlson. Pharmacoeconomics 2020
13
53

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
123
11

Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu, Richard Person, Yan Ding, Patricia Ward, Alicia Braxton, Min Wang, Christian Buhay,[...]. JAMA 2014
846
11


Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
37
16

Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study.
Stacy W Gray, Elyse R Park, Julie Najita, Yolanda Martins, Lara Traeger, Elizabeth Bair, Joshua Gagne, Judy Garber, Pasi A Jänne, Neal Lindeman,[...]. Genet Med 2016
76
11

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
56
11

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
306
11

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
209
11

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
126
11


Estimating Preferences for Complex Health Technologies: Lessons Learned and Implications for Personalized Medicine.
Deborah A Marshall, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, Karen V MacDonald, F Reed Johnson. Value Health 2017
13
46

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
88
9

Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Erik Parens, Cameron R Waldman, Robert Klitzman, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Hastings Cent Rep 2014
51
9

The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.
Isaac S Kohane, Daniel R Masys, Russ B Altman. JAMA 2006
216
9

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
218
9

Focus group discussions on secondary variants and next-generation sequencing technologies.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Hilde Van Esch, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Med Genet 2015
11
45


Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
Michael D Clark, Domino Determann, Stavros Petrou, Domenico Moro, Esther W de Bekker-Grob. Pharmacoeconomics 2014
364
9

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
214
9

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
73
9

Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment.
Megan A Lewis, Alex Stine, Ryan S Paquin, Carol Mansfield, Dallas Wood, Christine Rini, Myra I Roche, Cynthia M Powell, Jonathan S Berg, Donald B Bailey. Genet Med 2018
12
41

Issues surrounding the health economic evaluation of genomic technologies.
James Buchanan, Sarah Wordsworth, Anna Schuh. Pharmacogenomics 2013
70
9

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
Yvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James, Gail P Jarvik, Jennifer B McCormick, Tanya N Nelson, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019
55
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.