A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
Times Cited: 59







List of co-cited articles
389 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
132
32

Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.
Flavia M Facio, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
101
30


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
22

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
936
20

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
115
18

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
116
16

The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine.
Leslie G Biesecker, James C Mullikin, Flavia M Facio, Clesson Turner, Praveen F Cherukuri, Robert W Blakesley, Gerard G Bouffard, Peter S Chines, Pedro Cruz, Nancy F Hansen,[...]. Genome Res 2009
204
15

Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.
K A Kaphingst, F M Facio, M-R Cheng, S Brooks, H Eidem, A Linn, B B Biesecker, L G Biesecker. Clin Genet 2012
83
13

Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Katie L Lewis, Gillian W Hooker, Philip D Connors, Travis C Hyams, Martha F Wright, Samantha Caldwell, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2016
47
17

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
59
13

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
74
13

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
13

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
11

Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ma'n H Zawati, Karine Sénécal. Nat Rev Genet 2015
92
11

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
46
15


Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
39
17

Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project.
J Scott Roberts, Jill O Robinson, Pamela M Diamond, Archana Bharadwaj, Kurt D Christensen, Kaitlyn B Lee, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2018
36
19

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
89
10

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
78
10

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
68
10

Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Melissa Gymrek, Amy L McGuire, David Golan, Eran Halperin, Yaniv Erlich. Science 2013
482
10

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
10

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
58
10

The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier status.
Tia L Kauffman, Stephanie A Irving, Michael C Leo, Marian J Gilmore, Patricia Himes, Carmit K McMullen, Elissa Morris, Jennifer Schneider, Benjamin S Wilfond, Katrina A B Goddard. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017
16
37

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Emilie S Zoltick, Michael D Linderman, Molly A McGinniss, Erica Ramos, Madeleine P Ball, George M Church, Debra G B Leonard, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire, C Thomas Caskey,[...]. Genome Med 2019
25
24

Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael A Diefenbach, Randi Zinberg, Carol R Horowitz, Margaret Smirnoff, Micol Zweig, Samantha Streicher, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Lynne D Richardson. J Community Genet 2013
40
12

Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.
Jill Oliver Robinson, Thomas M Carroll, Lindsay Z Feuerman, Denise L Perry, Lily Hoffman-Andrews, Rebecca C Walsh, Kurt D Christensen, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016
34
14

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
254
8

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
122
8

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
51
9

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
8


Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
25
20

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Myra I Roche, Denise L Perry, Sarah R Scollon, Ashley N Tomlinson, Debra Skinner. Am J Med Genet A 2015
70
8

Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.
Ingrid A Holm, Brittany R Iles, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Sarah K Savage, Kurt D Christensen, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
16
31

Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Kurt D Christensen, Sarah K Savage, Noelle L Huntington, Elissa R Weitzman, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Cara N Cacioppo, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017
11
45

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
59
8


Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
8

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
59
8

Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.
Consuelo H Wilkins, Brandy M Mapes, Rebecca N Jerome, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Jill M Pulley, Paul A Harris. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019
23
21

Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review.
Susan Persky, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Celeste M Condit, Colleen M McBride. Genet Med 2007
70
6

Clinical interpretation and implications of whole-genome sequencing.
Frederick E Dewey, Megan E Grove, Cuiping Pan, Benjamin A Goldstein, Jonathan A Bernstein, Hassan Chaib, Jason D Merker, Rachel L Goldfeder, Gregory M Enns, Sean P David,[...]. JAMA 2014
305
6

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
277
6

Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.
Sabrina A Suckiel, Michael D Linderman, Saskia C Sanderson, George A Diaz, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt, Randi E Zinberg. J Genet Couns 2016
13
30

The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine.
Jason L Vassy, Denise M Lautenbach, Heather M McLaughlin, Sek Won Kong, Kurt D Christensen, Joel Krier, Isaac S Kohane, Lindsay Z Feuerman, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, J Scott Roberts,[...]. Trials 2014
102
6

Individualized iterative phenotyping for genome-wide analysis of loss-of-function mutations.
Jennifer J Johnston, Katie L Lewis, David Ng, Larry N Singh, Jamila Wynter, Carmen Brewer, Brian P Brooks, Isaac Brownell, Fabio Candotti, Steven G Gonsalves,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
46
8

Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Rebecca Branum, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen, Susan A Berry, Laura M Beskow, Mary B Daly, Conrad V Fernandez, Robert C Green, Bonnie S LeRoy,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2015
60
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.