A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
60 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
199
75

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
75

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
761
75

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
111
62

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
105
62


Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
62
62

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
81
50

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
211
50

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
218
50

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
118
37

Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patients.
T Rigter, C J A van Aart, M W Elting, Q Waisfisz, M C Cornel, L Henneman. Clin Genet 2014
30
37




Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in.
Maren T Scheuner, Jane Peredo, Judith Benkendorf, Bruce Bowdish, Gerald Feldman, Lynn Fleisher, John J Mulvihill, Michael Watson, Gail E Herman, James Evans. Genet Med 2015
35
37

"Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
Ashley N Tomlinson, Debra Skinner, Denise L Perry, Sarah R Scollon, Myra I Roche, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2016
36
37

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J Med Genet 2014
37
37



Position statement on opportunistic genomic screening from the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (UK and Ireland).
Anna Middleton, Chris Patch, Jennifer Wiggins, Kathy Barnes, Gill Crawford, Caroline Benjamin, Anita Bruce. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
20
37


Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.
Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Mireille Claustres, Ros J Hastings, Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts, Gabrielle Christenhusz, Maurizio Genuardi, Béla Melegh, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Philippos Patsalis, Joris Vermeesch,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
57
37

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
87
37

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
102
37

Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
D F Vears, K Sénécal, A J Clarke, L Jackson, A M Laberge, L Lovrecic, A Piton, K L I Van Gassen, H G Yntema, B M Knoppers,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
24
37

Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
Nancy R Downing, Janet K Williams, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Christian M Simon. Patient Educ Couns 2013
39
25

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
36
25

A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs.
Debra S Brandt, Laura Shinkunas, Stephen L Hillis, Sandra E Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Nancy R Downing, Megan F Liu, Lisa L Shah, Janet K Williams, Christian M Simon. J Genet Couns 2013
21
25

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
54
25

Secondary variants--in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
25
25

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
85
25

Focus group discussions on secondary variants and next-generation sequencing technologies.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Hilde Van Esch, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Med Genet 2015
10
25


Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
122
25

Incidental findings in genetic research and clinical diagnostic tests: a systematic review.
Leigh Jackson, Lesley Goldsmith, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Am J Med Genet A 2012
34
25

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Cameron R Waldman, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Erik Parens, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2014
44
25

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
128
25

The communication of secondary variants: interviews with parents whose children have undergone array-CGH testing.
G M Christenhusz, K Devriendt, H Peeters, H Van Esch, K Dierickx. Clin Genet 2014
17
25

Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.
Tessel Rigter, Lidewij Henneman, Ulf Kristoffersson, Alison Hall, Helger G Yntema, Pascal Borry, Holger Tönnies, Quinten Waisfisz, Mariet W Elting, Wybo J Dondorp,[...]. Hum Mutat 2013
39
25


A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.
Jonathan S Berg, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Julianne M O'Daniel, Jessica K Booker, Lacey Boshe, Timothy Carey, Kristy R Crooks, Brian C Jensen, Eric T Juengst, Kristy Lee,[...]. Genet Med 2016
49
25

Is "incidental finding" the best term?: a study of patients' preferences.
Nina Tan, Laura M Amendola, Julianne M O'Daniel, Amber Burt, Martha J Horike-Pyne, Lacey Boshe, Gail E Henderson, Christine Rini, Myra I Roche, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2017
23
25

Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.
Gabrielle Natalie Samuel, Sandi Dheensa, Bobbie Farsides, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. BMC Med Ethics 2017
21
25



Secondary findings: How did we get here, and where are we going?
Kelly E Ormond, Julianne M O'Daniel, Sarah S Kalia. J Genet Couns 2019
13
25

Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.
Marlies Saelaert, Heidi Mertes, Elfride De Baere, Ignaas Devisch. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
9
25

A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Heather M McLaughlin, Laura M Amendola, Sherri J Bale, Jonathan S Berg, David Bick, Kevin M Bowling, Elizabeth C Chao, Wendy K Chung, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2017
46
25

Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups.
P Gill, K Stewart, E Treasure, B Chadwick. Br Dent J 2008
329
25


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.