Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, Samuel D Gosling. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011
Times Cited: 2526
Times Cited: 2526
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.
Jesse Chandler, Danielle Shapiro. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2016
Jesse Chandler, Danielle Shapiro. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2016
8
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.
David J Hauser, Norbert Schwarz. Behav Res Methods 2016
David J Hauser, Norbert Schwarz. Behav Res Methods 2016
8
The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory.
Thomas F Cash, Emily C Fleming. Int J Eat Disord 2002
Thomas F Cash, Emily C Fleming. Int J Eat Disord 2002
7
The Happy American Body 2.0: Predictors of affective body satisfaction in two U.S. national internet panel surveys.
David A Frederick, Justin R Garcia, Amanda N Gesselman, Kristen P Mark, Elaine Hatfield, George Bohrnstedt. Body Image 2020
David A Frederick, Justin R Garcia, Amanda N Gesselman, Kristen P Mark, Elaine Hatfield, George Bohrnstedt. Body Image 2020
28
Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005-2012.
A J Tomiyama, J M Hunger, J Nguyen-Cuu, C Wells. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016
A J Tomiyama, J M Hunger, J Nguyen-Cuu, C Wells. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016
7
Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4).
Lauren M Schaefer, Natasha L Burke, J Kevin Thompson, Robert F Dedrick, Leslie J Heinberg, Rachel M Calogero, Anna M Bardone-Cone, Mary K Higgins, David A Frederick, Mackenzie Kelly,[...]. Psychol Assess 2015
Lauren M Schaefer, Natasha L Burke, J Kevin Thompson, Robert F Dedrick, Leslie J Heinberg, Rachel M Calogero, Anna M Bardone-Cone, Mary K Higgins, David A Frederick, Mackenzie Kelly,[...]. Psychol Assess 2015
7
Body image and face image in Asian American and white women: Examining associations with surveillance, construal of self, perfectionism, and sociocultural pressures.
David A Frederick, Mackenzie C Kelly, Janet D Latner, Gaganjyot Sandhu, Yuying Tsong. Body Image 2016
David A Frederick, Mackenzie C Kelly, Janet D Latner, Gaganjyot Sandhu, Yuying Tsong. Body Image 2016
21
Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Eyal Peer, Joachim Vosgerau, Alessandro Acquisti. Behav Res Methods 2014
Eyal Peer, Joachim Vosgerau, Alessandro Acquisti. Behav Res Methods 2014
6
The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research.
Kimberly A Arditte, Demet Çek, Ashley M Shaw, Kiara R Timpano. Psychol Assess 2016
Kimberly A Arditte, Demet Çek, Ashley M Shaw, Kiara R Timpano. Psychol Assess 2016
6
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
Winter Mason, Siddharth Suri. Behav Res Methods 2012
Winter Mason, Siddharth Suri. Behav Res Methods 2012
6
Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.
Samuel D Gosling, Simine Vazire, Sanjay Srivastava, Oliver P John. Am Psychol 2004
Samuel D Gosling, Simine Vazire, Sanjay Srivastava, Oliver P John. Am Psychol 2004
6
An abbreviated 10-item, two-factor version of the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI-10): The U.S. Body Project I.
Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson, Rachel F Rodgers, David A Frederick. Body Image 2022
Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson, Rachel F Rodgers, David A Frederick. Body Image 2022
60
Correlates of appearance and weight satisfaction in a U.S. National Sample: Personality, attachment style, television viewing, self-esteem, and life satisfaction.
David A Frederick, Gaganjyot Sandhu, Patrick J Morse, Viren Swami. Body Image 2016
David A Frederick, Gaganjyot Sandhu, Patrick J Morse, Viren Swami. Body Image 2016
12
Examining the utility of nonlinear machine learning approaches versus linear regression for predicting body image outcomes: The U.S. Body Project I.
Dehua Liang, David A Frederick, Elia E Lledo, Natalia Rosenfield, Vincent Berardi, Erik Linstead, Uri Maoz. Body Image 2022
Dehua Liang, David A Frederick, Elia E Lledo, Natalia Rosenfield, Vincent Berardi, Erik Linstead, Uri Maoz. Body Image 2022
66
Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among a United States adult sample.
Elizabeth A Fallon, Brandonn S Harris, Paige Johnson. Eat Behav 2014
Elizabeth A Fallon, Brandonn S Harris, Paige Johnson. Eat Behav 2014
7
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Adam W Meade, S Bartholomew Craig. Psychol Methods 2012
Adam W Meade, S Bartholomew Craig. Psychol Methods 2012
5
The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research.
Tara S Behrend, David J Sharek, Adam W Meade, Eric N Wiebe. Behav Res Methods 2011
Tara S Behrend, David J Sharek, Adam W Meade, Eric N Wiebe. Behav Res Methods 2011
5
Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.
Melissa G Keith, Louis Tay, Peter D Harms. Front Psychol 2017
Melissa G Keith, Louis Tay, Peter D Harms. Front Psychol 2017
8
The swimsuit issue: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults.
David A Frederick, Letitia Anne Peplau, Janet Lever. Body Image 2006
David A Frederick, Letitia Anne Peplau, Janet Lever. Body Image 2006
5
Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: a meta-analysis.
Shelly Grabe, Janet Shibley Hyde. Psychol Bull 2006
Shelly Grabe, Janet Shibley Hyde. Psychol Bull 2006
5
Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis.
David A Frederick, Martie G Haselton. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2007
David A Frederick, Martie G Haselton. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2007
5
Demographic predictors of objectification theory and tripartite influence model constructs: The U.S. Body Project I.
David A Frederick, Eva Pila, Vanessa L Malcarne, Emilio J Compte, Jason M Nagata, Cassidy R Best, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, Tiffany A Brown, Lexie Convertino, Canice E Crerand,[...]. Body Image 2022
David A Frederick, Eva Pila, Vanessa L Malcarne, Emilio J Compte, Jason M Nagata, Cassidy R Best, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, Tiffany A Brown, Lexie Convertino, Canice E Crerand,[...]. Body Image 2022
62
SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer's MAP test.
B P O'Connor. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000
B P O'Connor. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000
4
Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.
Karoline Mortensen, Taylor L Hughes. J Gen Intern Med 2018
Karoline Mortensen, Taylor L Hughes. J Gen Intern Med 2018
4
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.
Matthew J C Crump, John V McDonnell, Todd M Gureckis. PLoS One 2013
Matthew J C Crump, John V McDonnell, Todd M Gureckis. PLoS One 2013
4
The relationship between motivation, monetary compensation, and data quality among US- and India-based workers on Mechanical Turk.
Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Cheskie Rosenzweig. Behav Res Methods 2015
Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Cheskie Rosenzweig. Behav Res Methods 2015
6
Methods to detect low quality data and its implication for psychological research.
Erin M Buchanan, John E Scofield. Behav Res Methods 2018
Erin M Buchanan, John E Scofield. Behav Res Methods 2018
11
4
Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the lifespan.
David A Frederick, Janet Lever, Letitia Anne Peplau. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007
David A Frederick, Janet Lever, Letitia Anne Peplau. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007
5
Measurement invariance of body image measures by age, gender, sexual orientation, race, weight status, and age: The U.S. Body Project I.
Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson, Stuart B Murray, David A Frederick. Body Image 2022
Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson, Stuart B Murray, David A Frederick. Body Image 2022
66
Body size satisfaction and physical activity levels among men and women.
Judy Kruger, Chong-Do Lee, Barbara E Ainsworth, Caroline A Macera. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008
Judy Kruger, Chong-Do Lee, Barbara E Ainsworth, Caroline A Macera. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008
6
An exploration of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among Australian and French college women.
Rachel Rodgers, Henri Chabrol, Susan J Paxton. Body Image 2011
Rachel Rodgers, Henri Chabrol, Susan J Paxton. Body Image 2011
4
Does body satisfaction differ between gay men and lesbian women and heterosexual men and women? A meta-analytic review.
Melanie A Morrison, Todd G Morrison, Cheryl-Lee Sager. Body Image 2004
Melanie A Morrison, Todd G Morrison, Cheryl-Lee Sager. Body Image 2004
4
Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.
Letitia Anne Peplau, David A Frederick, Curtis Yee, Natalya Maisel, Janet Lever, Negin Ghavami. Arch Sex Behav 2009
Letitia Anne Peplau, David A Frederick, Curtis Yee, Natalya Maisel, Janet Lever, Negin Ghavami. Arch Sex Behav 2009
4
Support for an expanded tripartite influence model with gay men.
Tracy L Tylka, Michael J Andorka. Body Image 2012
Tracy L Tylka, Michael J Andorka. Body Image 2012
6
The enigma of male eating disorders: A critical review and synthesis.
Stuart B Murray, Jason M Nagata, Scott Griffiths, Jerel P Calzo, Tiffany A Brown, Deborah Mitchison, Aaron J Blashill, Jonathan M Mond. Clin Psychol Rev 2017
Stuart B Murray, Jason M Nagata, Scott Griffiths, Jerel P Calzo, Tiffany A Brown, Deborah Mitchison, Aaron J Blashill, Jonathan M Mond. Clin Psychol Rev 2017
4
Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?
David A Frederick, Daniel M T Fessler, Martie G Haselton. Body Image 2005
David A Frederick, Daniel M T Fessler, Martie G Haselton. Body Image 2005
6
The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I.
Viren Swami, David A Frederick, Toivo Aavik, Lidia Alcalay, Jüri Allik, Donna Anderson, Sonny Andrianto, Arvind Arora, Ake Brännström, John Cunningham,[...]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2010
Viren Swami, David A Frederick, Toivo Aavik, Lidia Alcalay, Jüri Allik, Donna Anderson, Sonny Andrianto, Arvind Arora, Ake Brännström, John Cunningham,[...]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2010
4
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.
Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Tzvi Abberbock. Behav Res Methods 2017
Leib Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Tzvi Abberbock. Behav Res Methods 2017
4
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
4
Demographic predictors of body image satisfaction: The U.S. Body Project I.
David A Frederick, Canice E Crerand, Tiffany A Brown, Marisol Perez, Cassidy R Best, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, Emilio J Compte, Lexie Convertino, Allegra R Gordon, Vanessa L Malcarne,[...]. Body Image 2022
David A Frederick, Canice E Crerand, Tiffany A Brown, Marisol Perez, Cassidy R Best, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, Emilio J Compte, Lexie Convertino, Allegra R Gordon, Vanessa L Malcarne,[...]. Body Image 2022
66
Are black-white differences in females' body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review.
Alan Roberts, Thomas F Cash, Alan Feingold, Blair T Johnson. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006
Alan Roberts, Thomas F Cash, Alan Feingold, Blair T Johnson. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006
4
Demographic and sociocultural predictors of face image satisfaction: The U.S. Body Project I.
David A Frederick, Tania A Reynolds, Carlos A Barrera, Stuart B Murray. Body Image 2022
David A Frederick, Tania A Reynolds, Carlos A Barrera, Stuart B Murray. Body Image 2022
57
Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.
Jonathan Robinson, Cheskie Rosenzweig, Aaron J Moss, Leib Litman. PLoS One 2019
Jonathan Robinson, Cheskie Rosenzweig, Aaron J Moss, Leib Litman. PLoS One 2019
11
Demographic and sociocultural predictors of sexuality-related body image and sexual frequency: The U.S. Body Project I.
David A Frederick, Allegra R Gordon, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, John P Brady, Tania A Reynolds, Jenna Alley, Justin R Garcia, Tiffany A Brown, Emilio J Compte, Lexie Convertino,[...]. Body Image 2022
David A Frederick, Allegra R Gordon, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, John P Brady, Tania A Reynolds, Jenna Alley, Justin R Garcia, Tiffany A Brown, Emilio J Compte, Lexie Convertino,[...]. Body Image 2022
80
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.
Alexandra M Mellis, Warren K Bickel. Addiction 2020
Alexandra M Mellis, Warren K Bickel. Addiction 2020
7
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Albert-Georg Lang. Behav Res Methods 2009
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Albert-Georg Lang. Behav Res Methods 2009
3
Factor structure and construct validity of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire in college students: further support for a modified brief version.
Carlos M Grilo, Deborah L Reas, Christopher J Hopwood, Ross D Crosby. Int J Eat Disord 2015
Carlos M Grilo, Deborah L Reas, Christopher J Hopwood, Ross D Crosby. Int J Eat Disord 2015
3
Replication of a Modified Factor Structure for the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: Extension to Clinical Eating Disorder and Non-clinical Samples in Portugal.
Paulo P P Machado, Carlos M Grilo, Ross D Crosby. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2018
Paulo P P Machado, Carlos M Grilo, Ross D Crosby. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2018
6
Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?
C G Fairburn, S J Beglin. Int J Eat Disord 1994
C G Fairburn, S J Beglin. Int J Eat Disord 1994
3
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.