A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Elke Mersy, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Audrey B C Coumans, Luc J M Smits, Guido M W R de Wert, Suzanna G M Frints, Joris A Veltman. Public Health Genomics 2015
Times Cited: 3







List of co-cited articles
6 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
R Akolekar, J Beta, G Picciarelli, C Ogilvie, F D'Antonio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
330
66


Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.
Reana Tischler, Louanne Hudgins, Yair J Blumenfeld, Henry T Greely, Kelly E Ormond. Prenat Diagn 2011
98
66


Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy.
Mary E Norton, Bo Jacobsson, Geeta K Swamy, Louise C Laurent, Angela C Ranzini, Herb Brar, Mark W Tomlinson, Leonardo Pereira, Jean L Spitz, Desiree Hollemon,[...]. N Engl J Med 2015
392
66

Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.
Antina de Jong, Wybo J Dondorp, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Suzanne G M Frints, Guido M W R de Wert. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
93
66

Ultrasonographic fetal soft markers in a low-risk population: prevalence, association with trisomies and invasive tests.
Annika Ahman, Ove Axelsson, Gordan Maras, Christine Rubertsson, Anna Sarkadi, Peter Lindgren. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014
18
33

Knowledge of Down syndrome in pregnant women from different ethnic groups.
V N Chilaka, J C Konje, C R Stewart, H Narayan, D J Taylor. Prenat Diagn 2001
55
33

Expectation and knowledge of pregnant women undergoing first and second trimester ultrasound examination in a Chinese population.
Lin Wai Chan, Oi Ka Chan, Mo Ching Macy Chau, Daljit Singh Sahota, Tak Yeung Leung, Tak Yuen Fung, Tze Kin Lau. Prenat Diagn 2008
5
33

Quality of written information used in Down syndrome screening.
J Murray, H Cuckle, I Sehmi, C Wilson, A Ellis. Prenat Diagn 2001
20
33

Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Prenat Diagn 2008
42
33

Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?
Jennifer Hoskovec, Joan M Mastrobattista, Dennis Johnston, Anthony Kerrigan, Patricia Robbins-Furman, Catherine A Wicklund. Prenat Diagn 2008
26
33

Factors influencing women's acceptance of prenatal screening tests.
De-Kun Li, Kristen Karlberg, Soora Wi, Carol Norem. Prenat Diagn 2008
14
33

Genomics and perinatal care.
Joann Bodurtha, Jerome F Strauss. N Engl J Med 2012
26
33

Stress and anxiety in pregnant women exposed to ultrasound.
Elaine C P Da Silva, Sônia V L Silva, Rievani Damião, Eduardo B Fonseca, Sidney Garcia, Umberto G Lippi. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012
10
33

Prenatal testing: the perceptions and experiences of Muslim women in Australia.
V Tsianakas, Pranee Liamputtong. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2002
25
33


Perception and attitude of women with previous caesarean section towards repeat caesarean delivery.
Ehigha Jude Enabudoso, Michael Chudi Ezeanochie, Biodun Nelson Olagbuji. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011
10
33

Medical or surgical abortion and psychiatric outcomes.
Nafiye Yilmaz, Mine Kanat-Pektas, Sevtap Kilic, Cavidan Gulerman. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010
6
33

Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis.
K P Tercyak, S B Johnson, S F Roberts, A C Cruz. Patient Educ Couns 2001
91
33

Prevalence and predictors of receipt of prenatal information about genetic screening.
Nedra S Whitehead, Sonja A Rasmussen, Shanna Cox, Samuel F Posner. Prenat Diagn 2006
3
33

Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures.
I Kowalcek, A Mühlhoff, S Bachmann, U Gembruch. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
42
33

An artificial intelligent diagnostic system with neural networks to determine genetical disorders and fetal health by using maternal serum markers.
M S Beksaç, B Durak, O Ozkan, A N Cakar, S Balci, U Karakaş, Y Laleli. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995
7
33

Assessment of maternal anxiety levels before and after amniocentesis.
C C M Ng, F M Lai, G S H Yeo. Singapore Med J 2004
24
33

Prenatal chromosomal diagnosis. Racial and geographic variation for older women in Georgia.
D C Sokal, J R Byrd, A T Chen, M F Goldberg, G P Oakley. JAMA 1980
44
33

An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.
A T Beck, N Epstein, G Brown, R A Steer. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988
33

Stress and anxiety associated with prenatal diagnosis.
Ingrid Kowalcek. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007
20
33

Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of a negative psychological outcome.
K Leithner, A Maar, M Fischer-Kern, E Hilger, H Löffler-Stastka, E Ponocny-Seliger. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004
63
33


Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.
P Benn, H Cuckle, E Pergament. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013
194
33



Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal Down syndrome screening strategies: should the combined test continue to be widely used?
Jean Gekas, Audrey Durand, Emmanuel Bujold, Maud Vallée, Jean-Claude Forest, François Rousseau, Daniel Reinharz. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011
15
33



Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Yvonne Bombard, Diana W Bianchi, Carsten Bergmann, Pascal Borry, Lyn S Chitty, Florence Fellmann, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
142
33

Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
Nanette Okun, Anne M Summers, Barry Hoffman, Tianhua Huang, Elizabeth Winsor, David Chitayat, A Staines, Jo-Ann Johnson. Prenat Diagn 2008
22
33

Ethical challenges in providing noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.
Peter A Benn, Audrey R Chapman. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010
63
33

Aneuploidy screening: a position statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, January 2011.
Peter Benn, Antoni Borrell, Jenny Crossley, Howard Cuckle, Lorraine Dugoff, Susan Gross, Jo-Ann Johnson, Ron Maymon, Anthony Odibo, Peter Schielen,[...]. Prenat Diagn 2011
46
33

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
62
33

Prenatal testing for selection against disabilities.
Mary B Mahowald. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2007
7
33

A test for symmetry in contingency tables.
A H BOWKER. J Am Stat Assoc 1948
264
33

Survey of attitudes of pregnant women towards Down syndrome screening.
L N Al-Jader, N Parry-Langdon, R J Smith. Prenat Diagn 2000
35
33

The clinical implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders: challenges and progress made.
Nicholas Lench, Angela Barrett, Sarah Fielding, Fiona McKay, Melissa Hill, Lucy Jenkins, Helen White, Lyn S Chitty. Prenat Diagn 2013
89
33

Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.
Megan Allyse, Mollie A Minear, Elisa Berson, Shilpa Sridhar, Margaret Rote, Anthony Hung, Subhashini Chandrasekharan. Int J Womens Health 2015
150
33


Noninvasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy.
Christopher Robinson, Dirk van den Boom, Allan T Bombard. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014
8
33

Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
David Chitayat, Sylvie Langlois, R Douglas Wilson. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011
85
33

Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum.
Y M Lo, N Corbetta, P F Chamberlain, V Rai, I L Sargent, C W Redman, J S Wainscoat. Lancet 1997
33

Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women.
A Tabor, J Philip, M Madsen, J Bang, E B Obel, B Nørgaard-Pedersen. Lancet 1986
592
33


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.