A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

David William Hunter, Paul B Hibbard. J Vis 2015
Times Cited: 13







List of co-cited articles
139 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2014
48
69

Disparity statistics in natural scenes.
Yang Liu, Alan C Bovik, Lawrence K Cormack. J Vis 2008
40
53

Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.
S J D Prince, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
129
53

Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.
William W Sprague, Emily A Cooper, Ivana Tošić, Martin S Banks. Sci Adv 2015
44
53


Neural bases of stereopsis across visual field of the alert macaque monkey.
Jean-Baptiste Durand, Simona Celebrini, Yves Trotter. Cereb Cortex 2007
34
46




Natural image statistics and neural representation.
E P Simoncelli, B A Olshausen. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
954
46

Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.
Jenny C A Read, Bruce G Cumming. Nat Neurosci 2007
56
38



Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.
Jenny C A Read, Bruce G Cumming. Neural Comput 2004
34
38


Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.
Tushar Chauhan, Timothée Masquelier, Alexandre Montlibert, Benoit R Cottereau. J Neurosci 2018
11
45


Binocular energy responses to natural images.
Paul B Hibbard. Vision Res 2008
24
30



A statistical explanation of visual space.
Zhiyong Yang, Dale Purves. Nat Neurosci 2003
72
30


The surface of the empirical horopter.
Kai M Schreiber, James M Hillis, Heather R Filippini, Clifton M Schor, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2008
29
30


"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
36
30

Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.
I Ohzawa, G C DeAngelis, R D Freeman. J Neurophysiol 1997
154
23



Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.
Jenny C A Read, Graeme P Phillipson, Andrew Glennerster. J Vis 2009
27
23


The motor side of depth vision.
K Schreiber, J D Crawford, M Fetter, D Tweed. Nature 2001
54
23


The Southampton-York Natural Scenes (SYNS) dataset: Statistics of surface attitude.
Wendy J Adams, James H Elder, Erich W Graf, Julian Leyland, Arthur J Lugtigheid, Alexander Muryy. Sci Rep 2016
28
23




Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.
David M Hoffman, Ahna R Girshick, Kurt Akeley, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2008
282
23


The Active Side of Stereopsis: Fixation Strategy and Adaptation to Natural Environments.
Agostino Gibaldi, Andrea Canessa, Silvio P Sabatini. Sci Rep 2017
16
23

Receptive fields of disparity-tuned simple cells in macaque V1.
Doris Y Tsao, Bevil R Conway, Margaret S Livingstone. Neuron 2003
43
23

Recurrent connectivity can account for the dynamics of disparity processing in V1.
Jason M Samonds, Brian R Potetz, Christopher W Tyler, Tai Sing Lee. J Neurosci 2013
17
23

A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images.
Jenny C A Read, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming. Vis Neurosci 2002
62
23

Visual Perception: Neural Networks for Stereopsis.
Jenny C A Read, Bruce G Cumming. Curr Biol 2017
6
50

Estimating 3D tilt from local image cues in natural scenes.
Johannes Burge, Brian C McCann, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2016
15
23

Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex.
Andrew J Parker. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007
194
23



Robust active binocular vision through intrinsically motivated learning.
Luca Lonini, Sébastien Forestier, Céline Teulière, Yu Zhao, Bertram E Shi, Jochen Triesch. Front Neurorobot 2013
12
25


Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase.
A Anzai, I Ohzawa, R D Freeman. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997
73
15


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.