A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Ellen Otten, Erwin Birnie, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M van Langen. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
Times Cited: 17







List of co-cited articles
64 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.
Adam H Buchanan, Santanu K Datta, Celette Sugg Skinner, Gail P Hollowell, Henry F Beresford, Thomas Freeland, Benjamin Rogers, John Boling, P Kelly Marcom, Martha B Adams. J Genet Couns 2015
69
41

Implementing a Virtual Health Telemedicine Program in a Community Setting.
Scott M Weissman, Kate Zellmer, Nicole Gill, Deborah Wham. J Genet Couns 2018
16
43

Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services.
Jennifer S Hilgart, Julie A Hayward, Bernadette Coles, Rachel Iredale. Genet Med 2012
75
35

Telemedicine uptake among Genetics Professionals in Europe: room for expansion.
Ellen Otten, Erwin Birnie, Anneke M Lucassen, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M Van Langen. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
22
35

Utilizing Remote Real-Time Videoconferencing to Expand Access to Cancer Genetic Services in Community Practices: A Multicenter Feasibility Study.
Angela Bradbury, Linda Patrick-Miller, Diana Harris, Evelyn Stevens, Brian Egleston, Kyle Smith, Rebecca Mueller, Amanda Brandt, Jill Stopfer, Shea Rauch,[...]. J Med Internet Res 2016
34
29


Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Marc D Schwartz, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Beth N Peshkin, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Rachel Nusbaum, An-Tsun Huang, Yaojen Chang, Kristi Graves, Claudine Isaacs, Marie Wood,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2014
139
23

Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evaluations on satisfaction and quality of care.
Ellen Otten, Erwin Birnie, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M van Langen. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
21
23

Telephoned BRCA1/2 genetic test results: prevalence, practice, and patient satisfaction.
L Baumanis, J P Evans, N Callanan, L R Susswein. J Genet Couns 2009
48
23

Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service Delivery Model Task Force.
Stephanie A Cohen, Monica L Marvin, Bronson D Riley, Hetal S Vig, Julie A Rousseau, Shanna L Gustafson. J Genet Couns 2013
72
23

Women's experience of telehealth cancer genetic counseling.
Elvira M Zilliacus, Bettina Meiser, Elizabeth A Lobb, Judy Kirk, Linda Warwick, Katherine Tucker. J Genet Couns 2010
31
23

Comparison of Telephone and Televideo Modes for Delivery of Genetic Counseling: a Randomized Trial.
Corrine I Voils, Vickie L Venne, Hollis Weidenbacher, Nina Sperber, Santanu Datta. J Genet Couns 2018
19
23


Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to improve family communication.
Jan Hodgson, Sylvia Metcalfe, Clara Gaff, Susan Donath, Martin B Delatycki, Ingrid Winship, Loane Skene, MaryAnne Aitken, Jane Halliday. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
35
17

Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service.
M R Gattas, J C MacMillan, I Meinecke, M Loane, R Wootton. J Telemed Telecare 2001
48
17

Real world experience with cancer genetic counseling via telephone.
Rebecca Sutphen, Barbara Davila, Heather Shappell, Tricia Holtje, Susan Vadaparampil, Sue Friedman, Michele Toscano, Joanne Armstrong. Fam Cancer 2010
25
17

Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling?
Elvira M Zilliacus, Bettina Meiser, Elizabeth A Lobb, Patrick J Kelly, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Judy A Kirk, Alan D Spigelman, Linda J Warwick, Katherine M Tucker. Genet Med 2011
38
17


A novel approach in pediatric telegenetic services: geneticist, pediatrician and genetic counselor team.
Shobana Kubendran, Siddharthan Sivamurthy, Gerald Bradley Schaefer. Genet Med 2017
26
17

Telegenetics: an Update on Availability and Use of Telemedicine in Clinical Genetics Service.
Irena Vrečar, Dimitar Hristovski, Borut Peterlin. J Med Syst 2017
24
17

Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling.
Heather A Zierhut, Ian M MacFarlane, Zahra Ahmed, Jill Davies. J Genet Couns 2018
22
17

Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models.
Stephanie A Cohen, Rachelle C Huziak, Shanna Gustafson, Robin E Grubs. J Genet Couns 2016
25
17

Clinical models of telehealth in genetics: A regional telegenetics landscape.
Alissa B Terry, Amanda Wylie, Melissa Raspa, Beth Vogel, Kunal Sanghavi, Luba Djurdjinovic, Michele Caggana, Joann Bodurtha. J Genet Couns 2019
14
21

Projecting the Supply and Demand for Certified Genetic Counselors: a Workforce Study.
Jennifer M Hoskovec, R L Bennett, M E Carey, J E DaVanzo, M Dougherty, S E Hahn, B S LeRoy, S O'Neal, J G Richardson, C A Wicklund. J Genet Couns 2018
105
17

Uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Imke Christiaans, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J Bonsel, Arthur Am Wilde, Irene M van Langen. Eur J Hum Genet 2008
67
11

Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families.
Laura E Forrest, Jo Burke, Sonya Bacic, David J Amor. Genet Med 2008
59
11

The impact of an interventional counselling procedure in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation: efficacy and safety.
Erica Sermijn, Liesbeth Delesie, Ellen Deschepper, Ingrid Pauwels, Maryse Bonduelle, Erik Teugels, Jacques De Grève. Fam Cancer 2016
29
11

Family letters are an effective way to inform relatives about inherited cardiac disease.
Wilma P van der Roest, José M Pennings, Marian Bakker, Maarten P van den Berg, J Peter van Tintelen. Am J Med Genet A 2009
52
11

Cost effectiveness analysis of different approaches of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Dalya Marks, David Wonderling, Margaret Thorogood, Helen Lambert, Steve E Humphries, H Andrew W Neil. BMJ 2002
124
11

Communicating familial hypercholesterolemia genetic information within families.
Susannah J Maxwell, Caron M Molster, Samantha J Poke, Peter O'Leary. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2009
11
18

Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients.
Angela George, Daniel Riddell, Sheila Seal, Sabrina Talukdar, Shazia Mahamdallie, Elise Ruark, Victoria Cloke, Ingrid Slade, Zoe Kemp, Martin Gore,[...]. Sci Rep 2016
91
11

Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.
Stephanie A Cohen, Shanna L Gustafson, Monica L Marvin, Bronson D Riley, Wendy R Uhlmann, S Bonnie Liebers, Julie A Rousseau. J Genet Couns 2012
40
11

Telegenetics in Maine: Successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project.
Dale Halsey Lea, Judith L Johnson, Sara Ellingwood, Walter Allan, Arvind Patel, Rosemarie Smith. Genet Med 2005
46
11

Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study.
Neal J Meropol, Mary B Daly, Hetal S Vig, Frank J Manion, Sharon L Manne, Carla Mazar, Camara Murphy, Nicholas Solarino, Vadim Zubarev. J Telemed Telecare 2011
32
11


The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review.
P A Jennett, L Affleck Hall, D Hailey, A Ohinmaa, C Anderson, R Thomas, B Young, D Lorenzetti, R E Scott. J Telemed Telecare 2003
148
11

The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing.
Rivka Sukenik-Halevy, Mark David Ludman, Shay Ben-Shachar, Annick Raas-Rothschild. Genet Med 2016
26
11

The virtual consultation: practitioners' experiences of genetic counseling by videoconferencing in Australia.
Elvira Zilliacus, Bettina Meiser, Elizabeth Lobb, Tracey E Dudding, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Katherine Tucker. Telemed J E Health 2010
25
11

Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.
Adam Hudson Buchanan, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Janet L Williams. Front Oncol 2016
49
11

Genetic counsellors in Sweden: their role and added value in the clinical setting.
Rebecka Pestoff, Charlotta Ingvoldstad, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
11
18

Telegenetic medicine: improved access to services in an underserved area.
H J Stalker, R Wilson, H McCune, J Gonzalez, M Moffett, R T Zori. J Telemed Telecare 2006
32
11

Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis.
K D Christensen, J L Vassy, L Jamal, L S Lehmann, M J Slashinski, D L Perry, J O Robinson, J Blumenthal-Barby, L Z Feuerman, M F Murray,[...]. Clin Genet 2016
64
11

Mainstreaming cancer genetics: A model integrating germline BRCA testing into routine ovarian cancer clinics.
Maira Kentwell, Eryn Dow, Yoland Antill, C David Wrede, Orla McNally, Emily Higgs, Anne Hamilton, Sumitra Ananda, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Clare L Scott. Gynecol Oncol 2017
52
11

Increasing genetic counseling referral rates through bundled interventions after ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Casey L Swanson, Amanika Kumar, Joy M Maharaj, Jennifer L Kemppainen, Brittany C Thomas, Megan R Weinhold, Kristine M Slaby, Kristin C Mara, Myra J Wick, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez. Gynecol Oncol 2018
10
20

Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.
Nan M Solomons, Amanda E Lamb, Frances L Lucas, Eileen F McDonald, Susan Miesfeldt. Telemed J E Health 2018
16
12




Reaching high-risk underserved individuals for cancer genetic counseling by video-teleconferencing.
Lindsey A Mette, Anna Maria Pulido Saldívar, Natalie E Poullard, Ivette C Torres, Sarah G Seth, Brad H Pollock, Gail E Tomlinson. J Community Support Oncol 2016
16
12

Models of service delivery for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling.
Angela M Trepanier, Dawn C Allain. J Genet Couns 2014
42
11


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.