A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Susan G Wardle, Barbara J Gillam. J Vis 2016
Times Cited: 5







List of co-cited articles
58 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
101
100



Mechanisms for similarity matching in disparity measurement.
Ross Goutcher, Paul B Hibbard. Front Psychol 2014
11
100

Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.
Heather R Filippini, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2009
53
80



Representation of stereoscopic depth based on relative disparity in macaque area V4.
Kazumasa Umeda, Seiji Tanabe, Ichiro Fujita. J Neurophysiol 2007
59
80

Spatial stereoresolution for depth corrugations may be set in primary visual cortex.
Fredrik Allenmark, Jenny C A Read. PLoS Comput Biol 2011
24
80

Sensitivity to depth relief on slanted surfaces.
Andrew Glennerster, Suzanne P McKee. J Vis 2004
16
80

Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex.
Andrew J Parker. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007
199
80





A simple account of cyclopean edge responses in macaque v2.
Christine E Bredfeldt, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurosci 2006
38
60

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
60

The perception of depth in simple figures.
G J Mitchison, G Westheimer. Vision Res 1984
81
60


Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.
S J D Prince, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
131
60





"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
38
60

Receptive field size in V1 neurons limits acuity for perceiving disparity modulation.
Hendrikje Nienborg, Holly Bridge, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurosci 2004
58
60

An Orientation Map for Disparity-Defined Edges in Area V4.
Yang Fang, Ming Chen, Haoran Xu, Peichao Li, Chao Han, Jiaming Hu, Shude Zhu, Heng Ma, Haidong D Lu. Cereb Cortex 2019
11
60


A specialization for relative disparity in V2.
O M Thomas, B G Cumming, A J Parker. Nat Neurosci 2002
145
60

Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.
Jenny C A Read, Bruce G Cumming. Nat Neurosci 2007
57
60

Surface continuity and discontinuity bias the perception of stereoscopic depth.
Ross Goutcher, Eilidh Connolly, Paul B Hibbard. J Vis 2018
4
75

Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4.
David A Hinkle, Charles E Connor. Nat Neurosci 2002
83
40

The spatial sense of the eye. Proctor lecture.
G Westheimer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979
251
40

Local figure-ground cues are valid for natural images.
Charless C Fowlkes, David R Martin, Jitendra Malik. J Vis 2007
36
40

Encoding and estimation of first- and second-order binocular disparity in natural images.
Paul B Hibbard, Ross Goutcher, David W Hunter. Vision Res 2016
7
40



A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.
Johan Wagemans, James H Elder, Michael Kubovy, Stephen E Palmer, Mary A Peterson, Manish Singh, RĂ¼diger von der Heydt. Psychol Bull 2012
379
40

The role of a local reference in stereoscopic detection of depth relief.
Yury Petrov, Andrew Glennerster. Vision Res 2004
13
40



A quantitative explanation of responses to disparity-defined edges in macaque V2.
C E Bredfeldt, J C A Read, B G Cumming. J Neurophysiol 2009
11
40

Binocular Depth Judgments on Smoothly Curved Surfaces.
Rebecca L Hornsey, Paul B Hibbard, Peter Scarfe. PLoS One 2016
2
100

5
40

Stereo transparency and the disparity gradient limit.
Suzanne P McKee, Preeti Verghese. Vision Res 2002
26
40

Contour completion through depth interferes with stereoacuity.
Dawn Vreven, Suzanne P McKee, Preeti Verghese. Vision Res 2002
11
40



Representation and measurement of stereoscopic volumes.
Ross Goutcher, L M Wilcox. J Vis 2016
4
50


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.