A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Michele C Gornick, Aaron M Scherer, Erica J Sutton, Kerry A Ryan, Nicole L Exe, Ming Li, Wendy R Uhlmann, Scott Y H Kim, J Scott Roberts, Raymond G De Vries. J Genet Couns 2017
Times Cited: 13







List of co-cited articles
59 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research.
S Y H Kim, H M Kim, D S Knopman, R De Vries, L Damschroder, P S Appelbaum. Neurology 2011
19
30

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
30


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
30

Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
Kristin L Carman, Coretta Mallery, Maureen Maurer, Grace Wang, Steve Garfinkel, Manshu Yang, Dierdre Gilmore, Amy Windham, Marjorie Ginsburg, Shoshanna Sofaer,[...]. Soc Sci Med 2015
34
23

Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy.
Lucie Rychetnik, Stacy M Carter, Julia Abelson, Hazel Thornton, Alexandra Barratt, Vikki A Entwistle, Geraldine Mackenzie, Glenn Salkeld, Paul Glasziou. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013
41
23

A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.
Nanibaa' A Garrison, Nila A Sathe, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Ingrid A Holm, Saskia C Sanderson, Maureen E Smith, Melissa L McPheeters, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2016
85
23

Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.
Scott Y H Kim, Ian F Wall, Aimee Stanczyk, Raymond De Vries. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2009
42
23

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
12
25

Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.
K A Kaphingst, J Ivanovich, B B Biesecker, R Dresser, J Seo, L G Dressler, P J Goodfellow, M S Goodman. Clin Genet 2016
27
23

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
15

Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool.
Rebekah E McWhirter, Christine R Critchley, Dianne Nicol, Don Chalmers, Tess Whitton, Margaret Otlowski, Michael M Burgess, Joanne L Dickinson. J Pers Med 2014
21
15

Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Laurence B McCullough, Leslie G Biesecker, Steven Joffe, Lainie Friedman Ross, Susan M Wolf. Am J Bioeth 2014
71
15

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
15

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
35
15


Genetic incidental findings: autonomy regained?
Effy Vayena, John Tasioulas. Genet Med 2013
20
15



Centralized research recruitment-evolving a local clinical research recruitment web application to better meet user needs.
Molly Dwyer-White, Aalap Doshi, Mary Hill, Kenneth J Pienta. Clin Transl Sci 2011
11
18

Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public's perspectives.
Diego S Silva, Jennifer L Gibson, Ann Robertson, C├ęcile M Bensimon, Sachin Sahni, Laena Maunula, Maxwell J Smith. BMC Public Health 2012
23
15

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
157
15


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
281
15

Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in.
Maren T Scheuner, Jane Peredo, Judith Benkendorf, Bruce Bowdish, Gerald Feldman, Lynn Fleisher, John J Mulvihill, Michael Watson, Gail E Herman, James Evans. Genet Med 2015
37
15

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
212
15


Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.
Lainie Friedman Ross, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, Rebecca R Anderson. Genet Med 2013
259
15

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
130
15



Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Myra I Roche, Denise L Perry, Sarah R Scollon, Ashley N Tomlinson, Debra Skinner. Am J Med Genet A 2015
66
15

Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.
Raymond De Vries, Aimee Stanczyk, Ian F Wall, Rebecca Uhlmann, Laura J Damschroder, Scott Y Kim. Soc Sci Med 2010
35
15


The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
119
15

Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Laura M Amendola, Michael O Dorschner, Peggy D Robertson, Joseph S Salama, Ragan Hart, Brian H Shirts, Mitzi L Murray, Mari J Tokita, Carlos J Gallego, Daniel Seung Kim,[...]. Genome Res 2015
225
15

Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.
Kyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, M Frances Wright, Matthew J Westbrook, Carla A Rich, Kevin M Bowling, Edward J Lose, E Martina Bebin, Shirley Simmons,[...]. Genet Med 2017
26
15

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
74
15

Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
Brooke L Levenseller, Danielle J Soucier, Victoria A Miller, Diana Harris, Laura Conway, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2014
54
15


A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Heather M McLaughlin, Laura M Amendola, Sherri J Bale, Jonathan S Berg, David Bick, Kevin M Bowling, Elizabeth C Chao, Wendy K Chung, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2017
47
15

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
122
15

Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.
Sara A Fowler, Carol J Saunders, Mark A Hoffman. J Genet Couns 2018
11
18

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
15

Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.
Leslie G Biesecker, Robert C Green. N Engl J Med 2014
346
15

Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.
Robert C Green, Katrina A B Goddard, Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Paul S Appelbaum, Jonathan S Berg, Barbara A Bernhardt, Leslie G Biesecker, Sawona Biswas, Carrie L Blout,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2016
98
15

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
15

Why and when should we use public deliberation?
Stephanie Solomon, Julia Abelson. Hastings Cent Rep 2012
35
15

Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.
Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, John Eyles, Patricia Smith, Elisabeth Martin, Francois-Pierre Gauvin. Soc Sci Med 2003
299
15

Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
K C O'Doherty, M M Burgess. Public Health Genomics 2009
68
15


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.