A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
Times Cited: 67







List of co-cited articles
350 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
799
59

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
55

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
115
26

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
203
23


Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
73
20


Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
110
19

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
16

"Not pathogenic until proven otherwise": perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project.
Elizabeth Ormondroyd, Michael P Mackley, Edward Blair, Judith Craft, Julian C Knight, Jenny C Taylor, John Taylor, Hugh Watkins. Genet Med 2018
31
35


To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
105
14

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
14

Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ma'n H Zawati, Karine Sénécal. Nat Rev Genet 2015
89
13

Whole-genome sequencing in health care. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
81
13

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
212
13

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
235
13

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing.
Kelly Hitch, Galen Joseph, Jenna Guiltinan, Jessica Kianmahd, Janey Youngblom, Amie Blanco. J Genet Couns 2014
45
20


Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
458
11

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
43
18

Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.
K A Kaphingst, J Ivanovich, B B Biesecker, R Dresser, J Seo, L G Dressler, P J Goodfellow, M S Goodman. Clin Genet 2016
27
29

Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study.
Stacy W Gray, Elyse R Park, Julie Najita, Yolanda Martins, Lara Traeger, Elizabeth Bair, Joshua Gagne, Judy Garber, Pasi A Jänne, Neal Lindeman,[...]. Genet Med 2016
68
11

A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Heather M McLaughlin, Laura M Amendola, Sherri J Bale, Jonathan S Berg, David Bick, Kevin M Bowling, Elizabeth C Chao, Wendy K Chung, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2017
47
17

When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
Leila Jamal, Jill O Robinson, Kurt D Christensen, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Melody J Slashinski, Denise Lautenbach Perry, Jason L Vassy, Julia Wycliff, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017
24
33

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
57
14

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
88
11

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
226
11

A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.
Jonathan S Berg, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Julianne M O'Daniel, Jessica K Booker, Lacey Boshe, Timothy Carey, Kristy R Crooks, Brian C Jensen, Eric T Juengst, Kristy Lee,[...]. Genet Med 2016
52
15

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
158
10


A standardized, evidence-based protocol to assess clinical actionability of genetic disorders associated with genomic variation.
Jessica Ezzell Hunter, Stephanie A Irving, Leslie G Biesecker, Adam Buchanan, Brian Jensen, Kristy Lee, Christa Lese Martin, Laura Milko, Kristin Muessig, Annie D Niehaus,[...]. Genet Med 2016
53
13

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
63
11

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
10

Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.
Kyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, M Frances Wright, Matthew J Westbrook, Carla A Rich, Kevin M Bowling, Edward J Lose, E Martina Bebin, Shirley Simmons,[...]. Genet Med 2017
25
28

Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here.
Teri A Manolio, Rex L Chisholm, Brad Ozenberger, Dan M Roden, Marc S Williams, Richard Wilson, David Bick, Erwin P Bottinger, Murray H Brilliant, Charis Eng,[...]. Genet Med 2013
331
8

Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.
Leslie G Biesecker, Robert C Green. N Engl J Med 2014
340
8

Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Laura M Amendola, Michael O Dorschner, Peggy D Robertson, Joseph S Salama, Ragan Hart, Brian H Shirts, Mitzi L Murray, Mari J Tokita, Carlos J Gallego, Daniel Seung Kim,[...]. Genome Res 2015
215
8

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
268
8


Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
8

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J Med Genet 2014
37
16

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
280
8

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
36
16

Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in.
Maren T Scheuner, Jane Peredo, Judith Benkendorf, Bruce Bowdish, Gerald Feldman, Lynn Fleisher, John J Mulvihill, Michael Watson, Gail E Herman, James Evans. Genet Med 2015
36
16

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
86
8

The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome.
A Haukkala, E Kujala, P Alha, V Salomaa, S Koskinen, H Swan, H Kääriäinen. Public Health Genomics 2013
23
26

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
47
12

Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Katie L Lewis, Gillian W Hooker, Philip D Connors, Travis C Hyams, Martha F Wright, Samantha Caldwell, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2016
45
13



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.