A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Emilia Niemiec, Pascal Borry, Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Hum Mutat 2016
Times Cited: 9







List of co-cited articles
17 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data.
Emilia Niemiec, Heidi Carmen Howard. Appl Transl Genom 2016
28
33

Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.
Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014
34
33

Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
41
33


The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
159
33

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
263
22

Should you profit from your genome?
Jessica L Roberts, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire. Nat Biotechnol 2017
14
22


Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. J Community Genet 2013
32
22

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
Pascal Borry, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
72
22





Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
70
22

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
994
22


Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum.
Y M Lo, N Corbetta, P F Chamberlain, V Rai, I L Sargent, C W Redman, J S Wainscoat. Lancet 1997
11

Stakeholder views on returning research results.
Susanne B Haga, Jennifer Q Zhao. Adv Genet 2013
13
11

Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.
Antina de Jong, Wybo J Dondorp, Merryn V E Macville, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Jan M M van Lith, Guido M W R de Wert. Hum Genet 2014
27
11

An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Katherine Kellom, Alexandra Barbarese, W Andrew Faucett, Ronald J Wapner. J Genet Couns 2014
38
11

Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N Engl J Med 2008
261
11

Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?
Wolf H Rogowski, Scott D Grosse, Jörg Schmidtke, Georg Marckmann. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
20
11

Prenatal whole-genome sequencing--is the quest to know a fetus's future ethical?
Ilana R Yurkiewicz, Bruce R Korf, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. N Engl J Med 2014
21
11


Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Danielle Soucier, Karen Hanson, Melissa S Savage, Laird Jackson, Ronald J Wapner. Genet Med 2013
151
11

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
60
11


The best possible child.
Michael Parker. J Med Ethics 2007
36
11

Generic consent for genetic screening.
S Elias, G J Annas. N Engl J Med 1994
115
11

The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Eline M Bunnik, Antina de Jong, Niels Nijsingh, Guido M W R de Wert. Bioethics 2013
41
11

Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes.
Eve J Kalynchuk, Andrew Althouse, Lisa S Parker, Devereux N Saller, Aleksandar Rajkovic. Prenat Diagn 2015
43
11




Genetic information: a joint account?
Michael Parker, Anneke M Lucassen. BMJ 2004
78
11

Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results.
Joël Vos, Anna M Jansen, Fred Menko, Christi J van Asperen, Anne M Stiggelbout, Aad Tibben. Genet Med 2011
27
11



Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step.
S C Hillman, D Willams, K J Carss, D J McMullan, M E Hurles, M D Kilby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
41
11


Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.
Caroline F Wright, Tomas W Fitzgerald, Wendy D Jones, Stephen Clayton, Jeremy F McRae, Margriet van Kogelenberg, Daniel A King, Kirsty Ambridge, Daniel M Barrett, Tanya Bayzetinova,[...]. Lancet 2015
440
11



Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus.
Jacob O Kitzman, Matthew W Snyder, Mario Ventura, Alexandra P Lewis, Ruolan Qiu, Lavone E Simmons, Hilary S Gammill, Craig E Rubens, Donna A Santillan, Jeffrey C Murray,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2012
251
11

Return of results: not that complicated?
James P Evans, Barbra B Rothschild. Genet Med 2012
48
11

Imposing genetic diversity.
Robert Sparrow. Am J Bioeth 2015
21
11

Parents' perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders.
Marian Reiff, Ellen Giarelli, Barbara A Bernhardt, Ebony Easley, Nancy B Spinner, Pamela L Sankar, Surabhi Mulchandani. J Autism Dev Disord 2015
50
11

Cell-free fetal DNA: the new tool in fetal medicine.
T R Everett, L S Chitty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
18
11



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.