A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Emilia Niemiec, Pascal Borry, Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Hum. Mutat. 2016
Times Cited: 5







List of co-cited articles
5 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.
Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014
28
60


Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
31
40


The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
124
40

Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum.
Y M Lo, N Corbetta, P F Chamberlain, V Rai, I L Sargent, C W Redman, J S Wainscoat. Lancet 1997
20

Stakeholder views on returning research results.
Susanne B Haga, Jennifer Q Zhao. Adv. Genet. 2013
10
20

Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.
Antina de Jong, Wybo J Dondorp, Merryn V E Macville, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Jan M M van Lith, Guido M W R de Wert. Hum. Genet. 2014
24
20

An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Katherine Kellom, Alexandra Barbarese, W Andrew Faucett, Ronald J Wapner. J Genet Couns 2014
34
20

Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008
228
20

Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?
Wolf H Rogowski, Scott D Grosse, Jörg Schmidtke, Georg Marckmann. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014
18
20

Prenatal whole-genome sequencing--is the quest to know a fetus's future ethical?
Ilana R Yurkiewicz, Bruce R Korf, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014
18
20


Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Danielle Soucier, Karen Hanson, Melissa S Savage, Laird Jackson, Ronald J Wapner. Genet. Med. 2013
105
20

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
47
20


The best possible child.
Michael Parker. J Med Ethics 2007
23
20

Generic consent for genetic screening.
S Elias, G J Annas. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994
87
20

The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Eline M Bunnik, Antina de Jong, Niels Nijsingh, Guido M W R de Wert. Bioethics 2013
24
20

Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes.
Eve J Kalynchuk, Andrew Althouse, Lisa S Parker, Devereux N Saller, Aleksandar Rajkovic. Prenat. Diagn. 2015
27
20




Genetic information: a joint account?
Michael Parker, Anneke M Lucassen. BMJ 2004
57
20

Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results.
Joël Vos, Anna M Jansen, Fred Menko, Christi J van Asperen, Anne M Stiggelbout, Aad Tibben. Genet. Med. 2011
26
20



Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step.
S C Hillman, D Willams, K J Carss, D J McMullan, M E Hurles, M D Kilby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
29
20


Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.
Caroline F Wright, Tomas W Fitzgerald, Wendy D Jones, Stephen Clayton, Jeremy F McRae, Margriet van Kogelenberg, Daniel A King, Kirsty Ambridge, Daniel M Barrett, Tanya Bayzetinova,[...]. Lancet 2015
299
20



Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus.
Jacob O Kitzman, Matthew W Snyder, Mario Ventura, Alexandra P Lewis, Ruolan Qiu, Lavone E Simmons, Hilary S Gammill, Craig E Rubens, Donna A Santillan, Jeffrey C Murray,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2012
209
20

Return of results: not that complicated?
James P Evans, Barbra B Rothschild. Genet. Med. 2012
44
20

Imposing genetic diversity.
Robert Sparrow. Am J Bioeth 2015
19
20

Parents' perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders.
Marian Reiff, Ellen Giarelli, Barbara A Bernhardt, Ebony Easley, Nancy B Spinner, Pamela L Sankar, Surabhi Mulchandani. J Autism Dev Disord 2015
32
20

Cell-free fetal DNA: the new tool in fetal medicine.
T R Everett, L S Chitty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
14
20


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet. Med. 2013
20

Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
Melissa S Savage, Mirella J Mourad, Ronald J Wapner. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011
27
20

An offer you can't refuse? Ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.
Dagmar Schmitz, Christian Netzer, Wolfram Henn. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009
25
20




Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence.
Martin Frank, Anne Prenzler, Roland Eils, J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg.  2013
31
20

Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units.
Lyn S Chitty, David Wright, Melissa Hill, Talitha I Verhoef, Rebecca Daley, Celine Lewis, Sarah Mason, Fiona McKay, Lucy Jenkins, Abigail Howarth,[...]. BMJ 2016
70
20



Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014
205
20

Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics.
Zuzana Deans, Melissa Hill, Lyn S Chitty, Celine Lewis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
25
20


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.