Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Atten Percept Psychophys 2017
Times Cited: 89
Times Cited: 89
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Psychol Sci 2015
Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Psychol Sci 2015
68
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
51
Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.
Risa Sawaki, Steven J Luck. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010
Risa Sawaki, Steven J Luck. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010
46
The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. Trends Cogn Sci 2018
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. Trends Cogn Sci 2018
43
Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search.
John M Gaspar, John J McDonald. J Neurosci 2014
John M Gaspar, John J McDonald. J Neurosci 2014
42
Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.
Daniel B Vatterott, Shaun P Vecera. Psychon Bull Rev 2012
Daniel B Vatterott, Shaun P Vecera. Psychon Bull Rev 2012
44
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
C L Folk, R W Remington, J C Johnston. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992
C L Folk, R W Remington, J C Johnston. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992
41
40
38
Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Clayton Hickey, Vincent Di Lollo, John J McDonald. J Cogn Neurosci 2009
Clayton Hickey, Vincent Di Lollo, John J McDonald. J Cogn Neurosci 2009
35
Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
49
The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
Jeff Moher, Howard E Egeth. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012
Jeff Moher, Howard E Egeth. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012
33
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
31
Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. J Cogn Neurosci 2018
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. J Cogn Neurosci 2018
45
29
Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.
Jason T Arita, Nancy B Carlisle, Geoffrey F Woodman. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012
Jason T Arita, Nancy B Carlisle, Geoffrey F Woodman. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012
28
Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.
Corbin A Cunningham, Howard E Egeth. Psychol Sci 2016
Corbin A Cunningham, Howard E Egeth. Psychol Sci 2016
40
Value-driven attentional capture.
Brian A Anderson, Patryk A Laurent, Steven Yantis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
Brian A Anderson, Patryk A Laurent, Steven Yantis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
22
Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
Oscar Ferrante, Alessia Patacca, Valeria Di Caro, Chiara Della Libera, Elisa Santandrea, Leonardo Chelazzi. Cortex 2018
Oscar Ferrante, Alessia Patacca, Valeria Di Caro, Chiara Della Libera, Elisa Santandrea, Leonardo Chelazzi. Cortex 2018
23
How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
24
A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention.
Risa Sawaki, Joy J Geng, Steven J Luck. J Neurosci 2012
Risa Sawaki, Joy J Geng, Steven J Luck. J Neurosci 2012
20
19
17
Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
Daniel B Vatterott, Michael C Mozer, Shaun P Vecera. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
Daniel B Vatterott, Michael C Mozer, Shaun P Vecera. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
76
Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. Curr Opin Psychol 2019
Nicholas Gaspelin, Steven J Luck. Curr Opin Psychol 2019
46
It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
Andrew B Leber, Howard E Egeth. Psychon Bull Rev 2006
Andrew B Leber, Howard E Egeth. Psychon Bull Rev 2006
15
Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.
Valerie M Beck, Andrew Hollingworth. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2015
Valerie M Beck, Andrew Hollingworth. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2015
41
Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.
Joy J Geng, Marlene Behrmann. Percept Psychophys 2005
Joy J Geng, Marlene Behrmann. Percept Psychophys 2005
15
Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
Clayton Hickey, John J McDonald, Jan Theeuwes. J Cogn Neurosci 2006
Clayton Hickey, John J McDonald, Jan Theeuwes. J Cogn Neurosci 2006
15
The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection.
Brian A Anderson. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016
Brian A Anderson. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016
15
Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.
M M Chun, Y Jiang. Cogn Psychol 1998
M M Chun, Y Jiang. Cogn Psychol 1998
14
Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.
C L Folk, R Remington. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998
C L Folk, R Remington. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998
14
Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.
Steven L Franconeri, Daniel J Simons. Percept Psychophys 2003
Steven L Franconeri, Daniel J Simons. Percept Psychophys 2003
14
Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.
S Yantis, J Jonides. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1984
S Yantis, J Jonides. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1984
14
Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.
John M Gaspar, Gregory J Christie, David J Prime, Pierre Jolicœur, John J McDonald. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016
John M Gaspar, Gregory J Christie, David J Prime, Pierre Jolicœur, John J McDonald. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016
16
Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.
Valerie M Beck, Steven J Luck, Andrew Hollingworth. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
Valerie M Beck, Steven J Luck, Andrew Hollingworth. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
44
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Michel Failing, Jan Theeuwes. Psychon Bull Rev 2018
Michel Failing, Jan Theeuwes. Psychon Bull Rev 2018
14
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
Benchi Wang, Jan Theeuwes. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
30
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Brad T Stilwell, Brett Bahle, Shaun P Vecera. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2019
Brad T Stilwell, Brett Bahle, Shaun P Vecera. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2019
48
Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.
Benchi Wang, Joram van Driel, Eduard Ort, Jan Theeuwes. J Cogn Neurosci 2019
Benchi Wang, Joram van Driel, Eduard Ort, Jan Theeuwes. J Cogn Neurosci 2019
40
Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.
Nicholas Gaspelin, John M Gaspar, Steven J Luck. Vis cogn 2019
Nicholas Gaspelin, John M Gaspar, Steven J Luck. Vis cogn 2019
72
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.