A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Joshua G W Bernstein, Henrik Danielsson, Mathias Hällgren, Stefan Stenfelt, Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner. Trends Hear 2016
Times Cited: 20







List of co-cited articles
161 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
Joshua G W Bernstein, Golbarg Mehraei, Shihab Shamma, Frederick J Gallun, Sarah M Theodoroff, Marjorie R Leek. J Am Acad Audiol 2013
57
60





Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility.
T Chi, Y Gao, M C Guyton, P Ru, S Shamma. J Acoust Soc Am 1999
156
30

Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner, Elaine Hoi Ning Ng, Björn Lidestam, Adriana Agatha Zekveld, Patrik Sörqvist, Björn Lyxell, Ulf Träff, Wycliffe Yumba, Elisabet Classon,[...]. Int J Audiol 2016
47
30





Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing.
J M Festen, R Plomp. J Acoust Soc Am 1983
171
20

Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.
Elizabeth S Anderson, Andrew J Oxenham, Peggy B Nelson, David A Nelson. J Acoust Soc Am 2012
44
20






The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.
Christi W Miller, Joshua G W Bernstein, Xuyang Zhang, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Ruth A Bentler, Kelly Tremblay. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018
5
80



A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
B C Moore, M Huss, D A Vickers, B R Glasberg, J I Alcántara. Br J Audiol 2000
280
15





Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
D S Brungart, B D Simpson, M A Ericson, K R Scott. J Acoust Soc Am 2001
348
15



Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
Leonid M Litvak, Anthony J Spahr, Aniket A Saoji, Gene Y Fridman. J Acoust Soc Am 2007
128
15



Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
Erwin L J George, Adriana A Zekveld, Sophia E Kramer, S Theo Goverts, Joost M Festen, Tammo Houtgast. J Acoust Soc Am 2007
96
15



Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech.
Michael A Stone, Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore. J Acoust Soc Am 2012
103
15





The development of a modified spectral ripple test.
Justin M Aronoff, David M Landsberger. J Acoust Soc Am 2013
72
15

A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.
Mahan Azadpour, Colette M McKay. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012
35
15


Development of a method for determining binaural sensitivity to temporal fine structure.
Christian Füllgrabe, Andrew J Harland, Aleksander P Sęk, Brian C J Moore. Int J Audiol 2017
18
16

An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling.
Thomas Brand, Volker Hohmann. J Acoust Soc Am 2002
93
15

Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Gusztáv Lőcsei, Julie H Pedersen, Søren Laugesen, Sébastien Santurette, Torsten Dau, Ewen N MacDonald. Trends Hear 2016
10
30

Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure.
Nikolai Bisgaard, Marcel S M G Vlaming, Martin Dahlquist. Trends Amplif 2010
65
15

The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Peter T Johannesen, Patricia Pérez-González, Sridhar Kalluri, José L Blanco, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda. Trends Hear 2016
30
15

The Danish hearing in noise test.
Jens Bo Nielsen, Torsten Dau. Int J Audiol 2011
47
15


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.