A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Stacy W Gray, Sarah E Gollust, Deanna Alexis Carere, Clara A Chen, Angel Cronin, Sarah S Kalia, Huma Q Rana, Mack T Ruffin, Catharine Wang, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. J Clin Oncol 2017
Times Cited: 23







List of co-cited articles
80 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
354
39

Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Deanna Alexis Carere, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Mack T Ruffin, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Ann Intern Med 2016
71
30

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Robert C Green. Public Health Genomics 2017
74
21

Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Daiva Elena Nielsen, Deanna Alexis Carere, Catharine Wang, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. BMC Med Genomics 2017
14
35

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
118
17

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Gareth J Hollands, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Sarah King, Theresa M Marteau. BMJ 2016
281
17


Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Megan A Allyse, David H Robinson, Matthew J Ferber, Richard R Sharp. Mayo Clin Proc 2018
68
17

Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
106
17

False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
134
17

Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Deanna Alexis Carere, Tyler J VanderWeele, Jason L Vassy, Cathelijne H van der Wouden, J Scott Roberts, Peter Kraft, Robert C Green. Genet Med 2017
22
13

American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.
Mark E Robson, Angela R Bradbury, Banu Arun, Susan M Domchek, James M Ford, Heather L Hampel, Stephen M Lipkin, Sapna Syngal, Dana S Wollins, Noralane M Lindor. J Clin Oncol 2015
348
13

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
13

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
70
13

Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.
Jada G Hamilton, Ekland Abdiwahab, Heather M Edwards, Min-Lin Fang, Andrew Jdayani, Erica S Breslau. J Gen Intern Med 2017
66
13

Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial.
Ranjit Manchanda, Kelly Loggenberg, Saskia Sanderson, Matthew Burnell, Jane Wardle, Sue Gessler, Lucy Side, Nyala Balogun, Rakshit Desai, Ajith Kumar,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014
125
13

Cancer genetics, precision prevention and a call to action.
Clare Turnbull, Amit Sud, Richard S Houlston. Nat Genet 2018
61
13

Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
Ranjit Manchanda, Shreeya Patel, Vladimir S Gordeev, Antonis C Antoniou, Shantel Smith, Andrew Lee, John L Hopper, Robert J MacInnis, Clare Turnbull, Susan J Ramus,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018
99
13

Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kelly F J Stewart, Anke Wesselius, Maartje A C Schreurs, Annemie M W J Schols, Maurice P Zeegers. J Community Genet 2018
42
13


Emergence of Hybrid Models of Genetic Testing Beyond Direct-to-Consumer or Traditional Labs.
Kathryn A Phillips, Julia R Trosman, Michael P Douglas. JAMA 2019
14
21

23andMe and the FDA.
George J Annas, Sherman Elias. N Engl J Med 2014
70
8

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
233
8



Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Genomic Sequencing.
Daniel E Spratt, Tiffany Chan, Levi Waldron, Corey Speers, Felix Y Feng, Olorunseun O Ogunwobi, Joseph R Osborne. JAMA Oncol 2016
165
8

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
8

The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.
J P Struewing, P Hartge, S Wacholder, S M Baker, M Berlin, M McAdams, M M Timmerman, L C Brody, M A Tucker. N Engl J Med 1997
8

Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.
Arjun K Manrai, Birgit H Funke, Heidi L Rehm, Morten S Olesen, Bradley A Maron, Peter Szolovits, David M Margulies, Joseph Loscalzo, Isaac S Kohane. N Engl J Med 2016
385
8

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
8



Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.
Susan M Domchek, Tara M Friebel, Christian F Singer, D Gareth Evans, Henry T Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Judy E Garber, Susan L Neuhausen, Ellen Matloff, Rosalind Eeles,[...]. JAMA 2010
902
8

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group.
Timothy R Rebbeck, Tara Friebel, Henry T Lynch, Susan L Neuhausen, Laura van 't Veer, Judy E Garber, Gareth R Evans, Steven A Narod, Claudine Isaacs, Ellen Matloff,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2004
737
8

Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Timothy R Rebbeck, Henry T Lynch, Susan L Neuhausen, Steven A Narod, Laura Van't Veer, Judy E Garber, Gareth Evans, Claudine Isaacs, Mary B Daly, Ellen Matloff,[...]. N Engl J Med 2002
8

Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.
Sining Chen, Giovanni Parmigiani. J Clin Oncol 2007
8

Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Deanna Alexis Carere, Peter Kraft, Kimberly A Kaphingst, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Genet Med 2016
42
8

The Deceptive Appeal of Direct-to-Consumer Genetics.
Wylie Burke, Susan Brown Trinidad. Ann Intern Med 2016
14
14

Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
41
8

Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience.
Sarah E Gollust, Stacy W Gray, Deanna Alexis Carere, Barbara A Koenig, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Amy L McGUIRE, Richard R Sharp, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, N A Wang, Robert C Green,[...]. Milbank Q 2017
16
12


A wellness study of 108 individuals using personal, dense, dynamic data clouds.
Nathan D Price, Andrew T Magis, John C Earls, Gustavo Glusman, Roie Levy, Christopher Lausted, Daniel T McDonald, Ulrike Kusebauch, Christopher L Moss, Yong Zhou,[...]. Nat Biotechnol 2017
206
8


Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing.
Uta Francke, Cheri Dijamco, Amy K Kiefer, Nicholas Eriksson, Bianca Moiseff, Joyce Y Tung, Joanna L Mountain. PeerJ 2013
53
8

Knowing your genes: does this impact behaviour change?
Clare B O'Donovan, Marianne C Walsh, Michael J Gibney, Lorraine Brennan, Eileen R Gibney. Proc Nutr Soc 2017
16
12

The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Jason L Vassy, Kurt D Christensen, Erica F Schonman, Carrie L Blout, Jill O Robinson, Joel B Krier, Pamela M Diamond, Matthew Lebo, Kalotina Machini, Danielle R Azzariti,[...]. Ann Intern Med 2017
114
8

Evaluating the evidence: direct-to-consumer screening tests advertised online.
Kimberly M Lovett, Timothy K Mackey, Bryan A Liang. J Med Screen 2012
17
11

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.
C Lerman, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995
351
8

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
Paul A Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G Conde. J Biomed Inform 2009
8

ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype.
Melissa J Landrum, Jennifer M Lee, George R Riley, Wonhee Jang, Wendy S Rubinstein, Deanna M Church, Donna R Maglott. Nucleic Acids Res 2014
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.