A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Shoko Vos, Johannes J M van Delden, Paul J van Diest, Annelien L Bredenoord. Trends Genet 2017
Times Cited: 12







List of co-cited articles
24 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
33

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
25


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
25


Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
212
16

Incidental variants are critical for genomics.
Leslie G Biesecker. Am J Hum Genet 2013
33
16

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
236
16

Translating genomics for precision cancer medicine.
Sameek Roychowdhury, Arul M Chinnaiyan. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2014
50
16

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
157
16


Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
D F Vears, K Sénécal, A J Clarke, L Jackson, A M Laberge, L Lovrecic, A Piton, K L I Van Gassen, H G Yntema, B M Knoppers,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
31
16



Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
16

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
16

Is It Our Duty To Hunt for Pathogenic Mutations?
Roel H P Wouters, Rhodé M Bijlsma, Geert W J Frederix, Margreet G E M Ausems, Johannes J M van Delden, Emile E Voest, Annelien L Bredenoord. Trends Mol Med 2018
5
40

The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings.
G Owen Schaefer, Julian Savulescu. Hastings Cent Rep 2018
11
18

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
16

A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Heather M McLaughlin, Laura M Amendola, Sherri J Bale, Jonathan S Berg, David Bick, Kevin M Bowling, Elizabeth C Chao, Wendy K Chung, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2017
47
16

INTRODUCTION: From the Right to Know to the Right Not to Know.
Bartha Maria Knoppers. J Law Med Ethics 2014
15
16

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
16


Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium.
Susan M Wolf, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Wendy K Chung, Ellen Wright Clayton, Robert C Green, Julie Harris-Wai, Gail E Henderson, Gail P Jarvik, Barbara A Koenig,[...]. Genet Med 2018
22
16

Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review of the evidence.
Yann Joly, Ida Ngueng Feze, Jacques Simard. BMC Med 2013
62
8

Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing.
April Malia Hirschberg, Gayun Chan-Smutko, William F Pirl. Cancer 2015
25
8

Information access. Raw personal data: providing access.
Jeantine E Lunshof, George M Church, Barbara Prainsack. Science 2014
34
8

Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.
Wim Pinxten, Heidi Carmen Howard. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014
32
8


Call for prudence in whole-genome testing.
C G van El, W J Dondorp, G M W R de Wert, M C Cornel. Science 2013
8
12

The cost-effectiveness of returning incidental findings from next-generation genomic sequencing.
Caroline S Bennette, Carlos J Gallego, Wylie Burke, Gail P Jarvik, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2015
65
8

Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.
Michael P Douglas, Uri Ladabaum, Mark J Pletcher, Deborah A Marshall, Kathryn A Phillips. Genet Med 2016
15
8

Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.
Caroline F Wright, Tomas W Fitzgerald, Wendy D Jones, Stephen Clayton, Jeremy F McRae, Margriet van Kogelenberg, Daniel A King, Kirsty Ambridge, Daniel M Barrett, Tanya Bayzetinova,[...]. Lancet 2015
381
8

A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders.
Zornitza Stark, Tiong Y Tan, Belinda Chong, Gemma R Brett, Patrick Yap, Maie Walsh, Alison Yeung, Heidi Peters, Dylan Mordaunt, Shannon Cowie,[...]. Genet Med 2016
203
8

Utility of whole-exome sequencing for those near the end of the diagnostic odyssey: time to address gaps in care.
S L Sawyer, T Hartley, D A Dyment, C L Beaulieu, J Schwartzentruber, A Smith, H M Bedford, G Bernard, F P Bernier, B Brais,[...]. Clin Genet 2016
206
8

Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Whole Exome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool: A Pediatric Center's Experience.
C Alexander Valencia, Ammar Husami, Jennifer Holle, Judith A Johnson, Yaping Qian, Abhinav Mathur, Chao Wei, Subba Rao Indugula, Fanggeng Zou, Haiying Meng,[...]. Front Pediatr 2015
105
8

Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.
Yaping Yang, Donna M Muzny, Fan Xia, Zhiyv Niu, Richard Person, Yan Ding, Patricia Ward, Alicia Braxton, Min Wang, Christian Buhay,[...]. JAMA 2014
819
8


Exome sequencing has higher diagnostic yield compared to simulated disease-specific panels in children with suspected monogenic disorders.
Oliver James Dillon, Sebastian Lunke, Zornitza Stark, Alison Yeung, Natalie Thorne, Clara Gaff, Susan M White, Tiong Yang Tan. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
51
8

Exome sequencing can improve diagnosis and alter patient management.
Tracy J Dixon-Salazar, Jennifer L Silhavy, Nitin Udpa, Jana Schroth, Stephanie Bielas, Ashleigh E Schaffer, Jesus Olvera, Vineet Bafna, Maha S Zaki, Ghada H Abdel-Salam,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2012
182
8

Are whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing approaches cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature.
Katharina Schwarze, James Buchanan, Jenny C Taylor, Sarah Wordsworth. Genet Med 2018
190
8


Effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing and costs of the traditional diagnostic trajectory in children with intellectual disability.
Glen R Monroe, Gerardus W Frederix, Sanne M C Savelberg, Tamar I de Vries, Karen J Duran, Jasper J van der Smagt, Paulien A Terhal, Peter M van Hasselt, Hester Y Kroes, Nanda M Verhoeven-Duif,[...]. Genet Med 2016
104
8

Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders.
Hane Lee, Joshua L Deignan, Naghmeh Dorrani, Samuel P Strom, Sibel Kantarci, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera, Kingshuk Das, Traci Toy, Bret Harry, Michael Yourshaw,[...]. JAMA 2014
567
8

Resolution of Disease Phenotypes Resulting from Multilocus Genomic Variation.
Jennifer E Posey, Tamar Harel, Pengfei Liu, Jill A Rosenfeld, Regis A James, Zeynep H Coban Akdemir, Magdalena Walkiewicz, Weimin Bi, Rui Xiao, Yan Ding,[...]. N Engl J Med 2017
342
8

Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice.
Siddharth Srivastava, Julie S Cohen, Hilary Vernon, Kristin Barañano, Rebecca McClellan, Leila Jamal, SakkuBai Naidu, Ali Fatemi. Ann Neurol 2014
159
8

NGS Technologies as a Turning Point in Rare Disease Research , Diagnosis and Treatment.
Ana Fernandez-Marmiesse, Sofia Gouveia, Maria L Couce. Curr Med Chem 2018
56
8

Whole-genome sequencing in health care. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
82
8

Enhanced utility of family-centered diagnostic exome sequencing with inheritance model-based analysis: results from 500 unselected families with undiagnosed genetic conditions.
Kelly D Farwell, Layla Shahmirzadi, Dima El-Khechen, Zöe Powis, Elizabeth C Chao, Brigette Tippin Davis, Ruth M Baxter, Wenqi Zeng, Cameron Mroske, Melissa C Parra,[...]. Genet Med 2015
292
8

An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.
Renjie Tan, Yadong Wang, Sarah E Kleinstein, Yongzhuang Liu, Xiaolin Zhu, Hongzhe Guo, Qinghua Jiang, Andrew S Allen, Mingfu Zhu. Hum Mutat 2014
125
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.