A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
Times Cited: 27







List of co-cited articles
199 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
936
59

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
37

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
33


Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
132
29

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
68
25

Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.
Kyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, M Frances Wright, Matthew J Westbrook, Carla A Rich, Kevin M Bowling, Edward J Lose, E Martina Bebin, Shirley Simmons,[...]. Genet Med 2017
29
25

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
78
25

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
74
25

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
16
43

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
22
31

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
89
22

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
59
22

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
59
22

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
37
22

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
22

Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
S I Ziniel, S K Savage, N Huntington, J Amatruda, R C Green, E R Weitzman, P Taylor, I A Holm. Public Health Genomics 2014
24
20

Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Kurt D Christensen, Sarah K Savage, Noelle L Huntington, Elissa R Weitzman, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Cara N Cacioppo, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017
11
45

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
18

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.
Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Phuong L Mai, June A Peters, Neelam Giri, Douglas R Stewart, Mark H Greene, Blanche P Alter, Sharon A Savage. Genet Med 2016
20
25

Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Michael J Bamshad, Holly K Tabor. Am J Med Genet A 2014
37
18

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
62
18

The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Phoebe L Bacon, Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Sarah K Savage, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
17
29

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
58
18


Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
39
18

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
51
14

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.
Amanda L Bergner, Juli Bollinger, Karen S Raraigh, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Carrie Lynn Blout, Aida Bytyci Telegrafi, Cynthia A James. Am J Med Genet A 2014
29
14

Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.
Kristi D Graves, Pamela S Sinicrope, Mary Jane Esplen, Susan K Peterson, Christi A Patten, Jan Lowery, Frank A Sinicrope, Sandra K Nigon, Joyce Borgen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin,[...]. Genet Med 2014
26
15

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
254
14

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
58
14

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
122
14

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
54
14

Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, Randi Zinberg, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, George A Diaz, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
38
14

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
25
16

The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome.
A Haukkala, E Kujala, P Alha, V Salomaa, S Koskinen, H Swan, H Kääriäinen. Public Health Genomics 2013
24
16

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
115
14

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
67
14

Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
Anne Marie Jelsig, Niels Qvist, Klaus Brusgaard, Lilian Bomme Ousager. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
24
16

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
16
25

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
14

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jessica Bulafka, Jimmy Duong, Yuan Zhang, Codruta Chiuzan, Jain Preti, Maria L Cremona, Vaidehi Jobanputra, Abby J Fyer,[...]. J Genet Couns 2018
18
22

Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
Julia Wynn, Katie Lewis, Laura M Amendola, Barbara A Bernhardt, Sawona Biswas, Manasi Joshi, Carmit McMullen, Sarah Scollon. BMC Med Genomics 2018
40
14

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
59
14

Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
45
14

Ethics of future disclosure of individual risk information in a genetic cohort study: a survey of donor preferences.
Kenji Matsui, Reidar K Lie, Yoshikuni Kita, Hirotsugu Ueshima. J Epidemiol 2008
22
18

The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.
R Jean Cadigan, Marsha Michie, Gail Henderson, Arlene M Davis, Laura M Beskow. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
21
14

The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.
C V Fernandez, D Santor, C Weijer, C Strahlendorf, A Moghrabi, R Pentz, J Gao, E Kodish. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007
51
11

The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
39
11



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.