A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
Times Cited: 20







List of co-cited articles
88 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
699
55

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
189
35

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
35


Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
219
25

Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.
Kyle B Brothers, Kelly M East, Whitley V Kelley, M Frances Wright, Matthew J Westbrook, Carla A Rich, Kevin M Bowling, Edward J Lose, E Martina Bebin, Shirley Simmons,[...]. Genet Med 2017
22
25

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
57
25

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
19
26

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
76
20

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
51
20

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
48
20

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
53
20

Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
S I Ziniel, S K Savage, N Huntington, J Amatruda, R C Green, E R Weitzman, P Taylor, I A Holm. Public Health Genomics 2014
21
20

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
20

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
115
20

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
45
20

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
55
20

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
67
20

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
22
20


Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
84
20

The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.
C V Fernandez, D Santor, C Weijer, C Strahlendorf, A Moghrabi, R Pentz, J Gao, E Kodish. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007
44
15

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
114
15

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
28
15

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.
Amanda L Bergner, Juli Bollinger, Karen S Raraigh, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Carrie Lynn Blout, Aida Bytyci Telegrafi, Cynthia A James. Am J Med Genet A 2014
26
15

Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Kurt D Christensen, Sarah K Savage, Noelle L Huntington, Elissa R Weitzman, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Cara N Cacioppo, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017
7
42

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
49
15

A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.
David Cella, Chanita Hughes, Amy Peterman, Chih-Hung Chang, Beth N Peshkin, Marc D Schwartz, Lari Wenzel, Amy Lemke, Alfred C Marcus, Caryn Lerman. Health Psychol 2002
140
15


Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Michael J Bamshad, Holly K Tabor. Am J Med Genet A 2014
34
15

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
52
15

The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Phoebe L Bacon, Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Sarah K Savage, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
15
20

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
149
15

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
31
15


Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
Anne Marie Jelsig, Niels Qvist, Klaus Brusgaard, Lilian Bomme Ousager. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
19
15

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
8
37

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jessica Bulafka, Jimmy Duong, Yuan Zhang, Codruta Chiuzan, Jain Preti, Maria L Cremona, Vaidehi Jobanputra, Abby J Fyer,[...]. J Genet Couns 2018
13
23

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.
Susanne B Haga, Julianne M O'Daniel, Genevieve M Tindall, Isaac R Lipkus, Robert Agans. Genet Med 2011
38
10

The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
36
10

Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.
Kristi D Graves, Pamela S Sinicrope, Mary Jane Esplen, Susan K Peterson, Christi A Patten, Jan Lowery, Frank A Sinicrope, Sandra K Nigon, Joyce Borgen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin,[...]. Genet Med 2014
22
10

Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.
Monkol Lek, Konrad J Karczewski, Eric V Minikel, Kaitlin E Samocha, Eric Banks, Timothy Fennell, Anne H O'Donnell-Luria, James S Ware, Andrew J Hill, Beryl B Cummings,[...]. Nature 2016
10

Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.
Heidi S Lumish, Hallie Steinfeld, Carrie Koval, Donna Russo, Elana Levinson, Julia Wynn, James Duong, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
51
10

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases.
Lotte Krabbenborg, L E L M Vissers, J Schieving, T Kleefstra, E J Kamsteeg, J A Veltman, M A Willemsen, S Van der Burg. J Genet Couns 2016
36
10

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
77
10

Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders.
Allyn McConkie Rosell, Loren D M Pena, Kelly Schoch, Rebecca Spillmann, Jennifer Sullivan, Stephen R Hooper, Yong-Hui Jiang, Nicolas Mathey-Andrews, David B Goldstein, Vandana Shashi. J Genet Couns 2016
38
10

Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, Randi Zinberg, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, George A Diaz, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
29
10

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
11
18

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
205
10

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
10


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.