A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Celine Moret, Alex Mauron, Siv Fokstuen, Periklis Makrythanasis, Samia A Hurst. J Med Ethics 2017
Times Cited: 9







List of co-cited articles
41 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
77

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
66

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
44

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
85
44

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
89
44

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
119
33

Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.
Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Mireille Claustres, Ros J Hastings, Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts, Gabrielle Christenhusz, Maurizio Genuardi, Béla Melegh, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Philippos Patsalis, Joris Vermeesch,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
56
33

Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Laura M Amendola, Michael O Dorschner, Peggy D Robertson, Joseph S Salama, Ragan Hart, Brian H Shirts, Mitzi L Murray, Mari J Tokita, Carlos J Gallego, Daniel Seung Kim,[...]. Genome Res 2015
225
33

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
268
33



Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
33


Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. J Med Ethics 2015
61
33

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
51
22

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
36
22

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
22

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
65
22

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
206
22

A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.
Jonathan S Berg, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Julianne M O'Daniel, Jessica K Booker, Lacey Boshe, Timothy Carey, Kristy R Crooks, Brian C Jensen, Eric T Juengst, Kristy Lee,[...]. Genet Med 2016
48
22


Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
212
22

High prevalence of genetic variants previously associated with LQT syndrome in new exome data.
Lena Refsgaard, Anders G Holst, Golnaz Sadjadieh, Stig Haunsø, Jonas B Nielsen, Morten S Olesen. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
94
22

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
56
22

Position statement on opportunistic genomic screening from the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (UK and Ireland).
Anna Middleton, Chris Patch, Jennifer Wiggins, Kathy Barnes, Gill Crawford, Caroline Benjamin, Anita Bruce. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
20
22

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
236
22

Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in.
Maren T Scheuner, Jane Peredo, Judith Benkendorf, Bruce Bowdish, Gerald Feldman, Lynn Fleisher, John J Mulvihill, Michael Watson, Gail E Herman, James Evans. Genet Med 2015
37
22


Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J Med Genet 2014
38
22

Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.
Ellen Otten, Mirjam Plantinga, Erwin Birnie, Marian A Verkerk, Anneke M Lucassen, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M Van Langen. Genet Med 2015
52
22

Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Yuan Zhang, Jo Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2015
14
22

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M Harrell, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Hum Genet 2014
85
22

Exome Sequencing and the Management of Neurometabolic Disorders.
Maja Tarailo-Graovac, Casper Shyr, Colin J Ross, Gabriella A Horvath, Ramona Salvarinova, Xin C Ye, Lin-Hua Zhang, Amit P Bhavsar, Jessica J Y Lee, Britt I Drögemöller,[...]. N Engl J Med 2016
172
22

Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management.
Linyan Meng, Mohan Pammi, Anirudh Saronwala, Pilar Magoulas, Andrew Ray Ghazi, Francesco Vetrini, Jing Zhang, Weimin He, Avinash V Dharmadhikari, Chunjing Qu,[...]. JAMA Pediatr 2017
189
22

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
14
22

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
22

ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.
Melissa J Landrum, Jennifer M Lee, Mark Benson, Garth Brown, Chen Chao, Shanmuga Chitipiralla, Baoshan Gu, Jennifer Hart, Douglas Hoffman, Jeffrey Hoover,[...]. Nucleic Acids Res 2016
22

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
124
22

Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.
Flavia M Facio, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
97
22

Public perceptions of disease severity but not actionability correlate with interest in receiving genomic results: nonalignment with current trends in practice.
Kristi D Graves, Pamela S Sinicrope, Jennifer B McCormick, Yingjun Zhou, Susan T Vadaparampil, Noralane M Lindor. Public Health Genomics 2015
18
22

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
241
22

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
74
11

Genetic incidental findings: autonomy regained?
Effy Vayena, John Tasioulas. Genet Med 2013
20
11


Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
220
11


Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.
Anne Andermann, Ingeborg Blancquaert, Sylvie Beauchamp, Véronique Déry. Bull World Health Organ 2008
431
11

Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records.
Sara L Van Driest, Quinn S Wells, Sarah Stallings, William S Bush, Adam Gordon, Deborah A Nickerson, Jerry H Kim, David R Crosslin, Gail P Jarvik, David S Carrell,[...]. JAMA 2016
114
11

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
157
11

Update on the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: estimating certainty and magnitude of net benefit.
George F Sawaya, Janelle Guirguis-Blake, Michael LeFevre, Russell Harris, Diana Petitti. Ann Intern Med 2007
116
11


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.