A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
21 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
111
62

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
463
37

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
207
37

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
83
37


To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
105
37

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
121
25

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
25

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
25

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Med Genet 2013
29
25



Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
63
25


Incidental Findings in Low-Resource Settings.
Haley K Sullivan, Benjamin E Berkman. Hastings Cent Rep 2018
10
25

The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings.
G Owen Schaefer, Julian Savulescu. Hastings Cent Rep 2018
10
25

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
831
25

Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
34
25

Incidental findings in genetic research and clinical diagnostic tests: a systematic review.
Leigh Jackson, Lesley Goldsmith, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Am J Med Genet A 2012
36
25

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
71
25

A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.
Jonathan S Berg, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Julianne M O'Daniel, Jessica K Booker, Lacey Boshe, Timothy Carey, Kristy R Crooks, Brian C Jensen, Eric T Juengst, Kristy Lee,[...]. Genet Med 2016
53
25

Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heard.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Jan M Friedman. Genet Med 2013
35
12

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
12

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.
Susanne B Haga, Julianne M O'Daniel, Genevieve M Tindall, Isaac R Lipkus, Robert Agans. Genet Med 2011
41
12

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing.
Kelly Hitch, Galen Joseph, Jenna Guiltinan, Jessica Kianmahd, Janey Youngblom, Amie Blanco. J Genet Couns 2014
45
12

Systematic Classification of Disease Severity for Evaluation of Expanded Carrier Screening Panels.
Gabriel A Lazarin, Felicia Hawthorne, Nicholas S Collins, Elizabeth A Platt, Eric A Evans, Imran S Haque. PLoS One 2014
52
12

The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions.
Holly Etchegary, Beth Potter, Heather Howley, Mario Cappelli, Doug Coyle, Ian Graham, Mark Walker, Brenda Wilson. Genet Test 2008
50
12

Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments.
Caron M Molster, Karla Lister, Selina Metternick-Jones, Gareth Baynam, Angus John Clarke, Volker Straub, Hugh J S Dawkins, Nigel Laing.  2017
12
12

The cost-effectiveness of returning incidental findings from next-generation genomic sequencing.
Caroline S Bennette, Carlos J Gallego, Wylie Burke, Gail P Jarvik, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2015
65
12

New challenges for informed consent through whole genome array testing.
C Netzer, C Klein, J Kohlhase, C Kubisch. J Med Genet 2009
33
12

Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing.
Michael C Leo, Carmit McMullen, Benjamin S Wilfond, Frances L Lynch, Jacob A Reiss, Marian J Gilmore, Patricia Himes, Tia L Kauffman, James V Davis, Gail P Jarvik,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2016
17
12

Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening.
Jeffrey R Botkin. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016
18
12

A timely arrival for genomic medicine.
Alan N Mayer, David P Dimmock, Marjorie J Arca, David P Bick, James W Verbsky, Elizabeth A Worthey, Howard J Jacob, David A Margolis. Genet Med 2011
55
12


A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing.
Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Kalotina Machini, Matthew S Lebo, Tim W Yu, Pankaj B Agrawal, Richard B Parad, Ingrid A Holm, Amy McGuire, Robert C Green, Alan H Beggs,[...]. Genet Med 2017
37
12

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
57
12

The "right not to know" in the genomic era: time to break from tradition?
Benjamin E Berkman, Sara Chandros Hull. Am J Bioeth 2014
20
12

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
220
12

Guilt, blame and responsibility: men's understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family.
Nina Hallowell, Audrey Arden-Jones, Ros Eeles, Claire Foster, Anneke Lucassen, Clare Moynihan, Maggie Watson. Sociol Health Illn 2006
69
12

Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testing.
Patricia Himes, Tia L Kauffman, Kristin R Muessig, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Michael O Dorschner, Marian Gilmore, Deborah A Nickerson, Jacob A Reiss, C Sue Richards,[...]. Genet Med 2017
20
12


Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planning.
Diane M Korngiebel, Carmit K McMullen, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, James V Davis, Marian J Gilmore, Cary O Harding, Patricia Himes, Gail P Jarvik, Tia L Kauffman,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2016
17
12




How, who, and when: preferences for delivery of genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.
Kimberly A Kaphingst, Jennifer Ivanovich, Ashley Elrick, Rebecca Dresser, Cindy Matsen, Melody S Goodman. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2016
5
20

Reporting incidental findings of genomic disorder-associated copy number variants to unselected biobank participants.
Liis Leitsalu, Helene Alavere, Sébastien Jacquemont, Anneli Kolk, Anne M Maillard, Anu Reigo, Margit Nõukas, Alexandre Reymond, Katrin Männik, Pauline C Ng,[...]. Per Med 2016
6
16

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
53
12

Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
Melinda L Yushak, Gang Han, Sara Bouberhan, Lianne Epstein, Michael P DiGiovanna, Sarah S Mougalian, Tara B Sanft, Maysa M Abu-Khalaf, Gina G Chung, Stacey M Stein,[...]. Cancer 2016
29
12

Statement of principles on the return of research results and incidental findings in paediatric research: a multi-site consultative process.
Karine Sénécal, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Bartha M Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Denise Avard, Daniel Sinnett. Genome 2015
15
12


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.