A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Kelly F J Stewart, Anke Wesselius, Maartje A C Schreurs, Annemie M W J Schols, Maurice P Zeegers. J Community Genet 2018
Times Cited: 33







List of co-cited articles
138 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
113
30

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Gareth J Hollands, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Sarah King, Theresa M Marteau. BMJ 2016
235
30

Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Megan A Allyse, David H Robinson, Matthew J Ferber, Richard R Sharp. Mayo Clin Proc 2018
55
21

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
60
21


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
345
18

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Robert C Green. Public Health Genomics 2017
57
18

Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.
Katherine Wasson, Tonya Nashay Sanders, Nancy S Hogan, Sara Cherny, Kathy J Helzlsouer. J Community Genet 2013
21
23

Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Deanna Alexis Carere, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Mack T Ruffin, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Ann Intern Med 2016
66
15

Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.
Brianne E Kirkpatrick, Misha D Rashkin. J Genet Couns 2017
19
21

Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
101
12

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
112
12

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2009
87
12


Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Deanna Alexis Carere, Peter Kraft, Kimberly A Kaphingst, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Genet Med 2016
41
12

Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.
E Vayena, E Gourna, J Streuli, E Hafen, B Prainsack. Public Health Genomics 2012
36
12

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: where and how does genetic counseling fit?
Anna Middleton, Álvaro Mendes, Caroline M Benjamin, Heidi Carmen Howard. Per Med 2017
27
14


Projecting the Supply and Demand for Certified Genetic Counselors: a Workforce Study.
Jennifer M Hoskovec, R L Bennett, M E Carey, J E DaVanzo, M Dougherty, S E Hahn, B S LeRoy, S O'Neal, J G Richardson, C A Wicklund. J Genet Couns 2018
119
9

Comprehension and Data-Sharing Behavior of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Test Customers.
Scott P McGrath, Jason Coleman, Lotfollah Najjar, Ann Fruhling, Dhundy R Bastola. Public Health Genomics 2016
18
16

Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.
Denise M Lautenbach, Kurt D Christensen, Jeffrey A Sparks, Robert C Green. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013
83
9

International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.
Cora L Craig, Alison L Marshall, Michael Sjöström, Adrian E Bauman, Michael L Booth, Barbara E Ainsworth, Michael Pratt, Ulf Ekelund, Agneta Yngve, James F Sallis,[...]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003
9

Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing?
Heather Skirton, Leigh Jackson, Lesley Goldsmith, Anita O'Connor. Per Med 2013
8
37

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
69
9

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS One 2010
75
9

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
61
9

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
110
9


Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services.
Catharine Wang, Tiernan J Cahill, Andrew Parlato, Blake Wertz, Qiankun Zhong, Tricia Norkunas Cunningham, James J Cummings. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018
22
13

Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.
Mary-Anne Young, Laura Elenor Forrest, Victoria-Mae Rasmussen, Paul James, Gillian Mitchell, Sarah Dilys Sawyer, Katrina Reeve, Nina Hallowell. J Genet Couns 2018
18
16

Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.
Jada G Hamilton, Ekland Abdiwahab, Heather M Edwards, Min-Lin Fang, Andrew Jdayani, Erica S Breslau. J Gen Intern Med 2017
48
9

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.
Sylvia A Metcalfe, Chriselle Hickerton, Jacqueline Savard, Bronwyn Terrill, Erin Turbitt, Clara Gaff, Kathleen Gray, Anna Middleton, Brenda Wilson, Ainsley J Newson. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
8
37

"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.
Erynn S Gordon, Georgia Griffin, Lisa Wawak, Hauchie Pang, Sarah E Gollust, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2012
47
9




Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Sylvia A Metcalfe, Chriselle Hickerton, Jacqueline Savard, Elaine Stackpoole, Rigan Tytherleigh, Erin Tutty, Bronwyn Terrill, Erin Turbitt, Kathleen Gray, Anna Middleton,[...]. Eur J Med Genet 2019
7
42

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
9

Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.
Monkol Lek, Konrad J Karczewski, Eric V Minikel, Kaitlin E Samocha, Eric Banks, Timothy Fennell, Anne H O'Donnell-Luria, James S Ware, Andrew J Hill, Beryl B Cummings,[...]. Nature 2016
9

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
9


Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. J Community Genet 2013
30
10


Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. J Med Ethics 2015
59
9

Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Sarah C Nelson, Deborah J Bowen, Stephanie M Fullerton. Am J Hum Genet 2019
15
20

Legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Europe: a fragmented regulatory landscape.
L Kalokairinou, H C Howard, S Slokenberga, E Fisher, M Flatscher-Thöni, M Hartlev, R van Hellemondt, J Juškevičius, J Kapelenska-Pregowska, P Kováč,[...]. J Community Genet 2018
31
9

Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Nikki M Carroll, Erica Blum-Barnett, Sarah D Madrid, Cabell Jonas, Kristen Janes, Monica Alvarado, Ruth Bedoy, Valerie Paolino, Nazneen Aziz, Elizabeth A McGlynn,[...]. J Genet Couns 2020
11
27

Trends and Gaps in Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests From 2007 to 2014.
Nate C Apathy, Terri Menser, Lindsay M Keeran, Eric W Ford, Christopher A Harle, Timothy R Huerta. Am J Prev Med 2018
9
33

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Rachel Horton, Gillian Crawford, Lindsey Freeman, Angela Fenwick, Caroline F Wright, Anneke Lucassen. BMJ 2019
20
15

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
221
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.