A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Craig Hedge, Georgina Powell, Petroc Sumner. Behav Res Methods 2018
Times Cited: 359







List of co-cited articles
431 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.
A Miyake, N P Friedman, M J Emerson, A H Witzki, A Howerter, T D Wager. Cogn Psychol 2000
20

Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.
A Zeynep Enkavi, Ian W Eisenberg, Patrick G Bissett, Gina L Mazza, David P MacKinnon, Lisa A Marsch, Russell A Poldrack. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019
138
20

A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks.
Jeffrey N Rouder, Julia M Haaf. Psychon Bull Rev 2019
52
30

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
11


Executive functions.
Adele Diamond. Annu Rev Psychol 2013
9

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
Katherine S Button, John P A Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz, Brian A Nosek, Jonathan Flint, Emma S J Robinson, Marcus R Munafò. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013
9


Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?
Junhua Dang, Kevin M King, Michael Inzlicht. Trends Cogn Sci 2020
87
9



The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies.
Roman Kotov, Robert F Krueger, David Watson, Thomas M Achenbach, Robert R Althoff, R Michael Bagby, Timothy A Brown, William T Carpenter, Avshalom Caspi, Lee Anna Clark,[...]. J Abnorm Psychol 2017
779
7

The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT.
Shelly R Cooper, Corentin Gonthier, Deanna M Barch, Todd S Braver. Front Psychol 2017
33
18

The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.
Justin E Karr, Corson N Areshenkoff, Philippe Rast, Scott M Hofer, Grant L Iverson, Mauricio A Garcia-Barrera. Psychol Bull 2018
124
6

Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives.
Christopher Draheim, Cody A Mashburn, Jessie D Martin, Randall W Engle. Psychol Bull 2019
54
11

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Albert-Georg Lang. Behav Res Methods 2009
6


Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
Dale J Barr, Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers, Harry J Tily. J Mem Lang 2013
5

Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control.
Nicola M Wöstmann, Désirée S Aichert, Anna Costa, Katya Rubia, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Ulrich Ettinger. Brain Cogn 2013
109
5

Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence?
Alodie Rey-Mermet, Miriam Gade, Alessandra S Souza, Claudia C von Bastian, Klaus Oberauer. J Exp Psychol Gen 2019
33
15

Construct validity in psychological tests.
L J CRONBACH, P E MEEHL. Psychol Bull 1955
5

Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications.
Quentin J M Huys, Tiago V Maia, Michael J Frank. Nat Neurosci 2016
333
5

Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery.
Ian W Eisenberg, Patrick G Bissett, A Zeynep Enkavi, Jamie Li, David P MacKinnon, Lisa A Marsch, Russell A Poldrack. Nat Commun 2019
84
5


Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments.
Laura Germine, Ken Nakayama, Bradley C Duchaine, Christopher F Chabris, Garga Chatterjee, Jeremy B Wilmer. Psychon Bull Rev 2012
187
5

Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.
Thomas Insel, Bruce Cuthbert, Marjorie Garvey, Robert Heinssen, Daniel S Pine, Kevin Quinn, Charles Sanislow, Philip Wang. Am J Psychiatry 2010
5

Test-retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery.
Michael M Plichta, Adam J Schwarz, Oliver Grimm, Katrin Morgen, Daniela Mier, Leila Haddad, Antje B M Gerdes, Carina Sauer, Heike Tost, Christine Esslinger,[...]. Neuroimage 2012
199
5


PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.
Jonathan Peirce, Jeremy R Gray, Sol Simpson, Michael MacAskill, Richard Höchenberger, Hiroyuki Sogo, Erik Kastman, Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv. Behav Res Methods 2019
554
5


Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis.
Mariëtte Huizinga, Conor V Dolan, Maurits W van der Molen. Neuropsychologia 2006
710
5


Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test.
Jeffrey W Macleod, Michael A Lawrence, Meghan M McConnell, Gail A Eskes, Raymond M Klein, David I Shore. Neuropsychology 2010
159
4


Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin.
Naomi P Friedman, Akira Miyake, Susan E Young, John C DeFries, Robin P Corley, John K Hewitt. J Exp Psychol Gen 2008
699
4

A Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of Self-Control Measures.
Angela Lee Duckworth, Margaret L Kern. J Res Pers 2011
305
4


Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.
Matthew J C Crump, John V McDonnell, Todd M Gureckis. PLoS One 2013
501
4

Orienting of attention.
M I Posner. Q J Exp Psychol 1980
4

An automated version of the operation span task.
Nash Unsworth, Richard P Heitz, Josef C Schrock, Randall W Engle. Behav Res Methods 2005
729
4

An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.
E K Miller, J D Cohen. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
4

Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.
Thomas L Rodebaugh, Rachel B Scullin, Julia K Langer, David J Dixon, Jonathan D Huppert, Amit Bernstein, Ariel Zvielli, Eric J Lenze. J Abnorm Psychol 2016
123
4

Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.
Emily S Kappenman, Jaclyn L Farrens, Steven J Luck, Greg Hajcak Proudfit. Front Psychol 2014
134
4




Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.
Alodie Rey-Mermet, Miriam Gade, Klaus Oberauer. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2018
98
4

Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.
M M Botvinick, T S Braver, D M Barch, C S Carter, J D Cohen. Psychol Rev 2001
4

Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
Yair Bar-Haim, Dominique Lamy, Lee Pergamin, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H van IJzendoorn. Psychol Bull 2007
4

What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis.
Maxwell L Elliott, Annchen R Knodt, David Ireland, Meriwether L Morris, Richie Poulton, Sandhya Ramrakha, Maria L Sison, Terrie E Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi, Ahmad R Hariri. Psychol Sci 2020
177
4


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.