A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Robert Suurmond, Henk van Rhee, Tony Hak. Res Synth Methods 2017
Times Cited: 246







List of co-cited articles
105 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
33

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks, Douglas G Altman. BMJ 2003
20

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
M Egger, G Davey Smith, M Schneider, C Minder. BMJ 1997
19


Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart. Syst Rev 2015
10

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Jonathan A C Sterne, Jelena Savović, Matthew J Page, Roy G Elbers, Natalie S Blencowe, Isabelle Boutron, Christopher J Cates, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Mark S Corbett, Sandra M Eldridge,[...]. BMJ 2019
9

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Mourad Ouzzani, Hossam Hammady, Zbys Fedorowicz, Ahmed Elmagarmid. Syst Rev 2016
9

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. Ann Intern Med 2009
8

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Julian P T Higgins, Douglas G Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Peter Jüni, David Moher, Andrew D Oxman, Jelena Savovic, Kenneth F Schulz, Laura Weeks, Jonathan A C Sterne. BMJ 2011
8

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson. Stat Med 2002
7

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.
Stela Pudar Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Iztok Hozo. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005
7

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
Jonathan Ac Sterne, Miguel A Hernán, Barnaby C Reeves, Jelena Savović, Nancy D Berkman, Meera Viswanathan, David Henry, Douglas G Altman, Mohammed T Ansari, Isabelle Boutron,[...]. BMJ 2016
6

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. PLoS Med 2009
5


Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. BMJ 2009
5

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan,[...]. BMJ 2021
5

On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis.
Robert A Peterson, Steven P Brown. J Appl Psychol 2005
309
4

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
D F Stroup, J A Berlin, S C Morton, I Olkin, G D Williamson, D Rennie, D Moher, B J Becker, T A Sipe, S B Thacker. JAMA 2000
4

Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
R DerSimonian, N Laird. Control Clin Trials 1986
4

Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.
Karem Slim, Emile Nini, Damien Forestier, Fabrice Kwiatkowski, Yves Panis, Jacques Chipponi. ANZ J Surg 2003
4

A new look at the schema therapy model: organization and role of early maladaptive schemas.
Bo Bach, George Lockwood, Jeffrey E Young. Cogn Behav Ther 2018
32
12

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Jonathan A C Sterne, Alex J Sutton, John P A Ioannidis, Norma Terrin, David R Jones, Joseph Lau, James Carpenter, Gerta Rücker, Roger M Harbord, Christopher H Schmid,[...]. BMJ 2011
4

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. Int J Surg 2010
4

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Penny F Whiting, Anne W S Rutjes, Marie E Westwood, Susan Mallett, Jonathan J Deeks, Johannes B Reitsma, Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan A C Sterne, Patrick M M Bossuyt. Ann Intern Med 2011
4

Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Tania B Huedo-Medina, Julio Sánchez-Meca, Fulgencio Marín-Martínez, Juan Botella. Psychol Methods 2006
3


Meta-analysis and subgroups.
Michael Borenstein, Julian P T Higgins. Prev Sci 2013
208
3

Executive functions.
Adele Diamond. Annu Rev Psychol 2013
3

Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis.
Dan Jackson, Rebecca Turner. Res Synth Methods 2017
187
3

Panethnic Differences in Blood Pressure in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pietro Amedeo Modesti, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Francesco P Cappuccio, Charles Agyemang, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Stefano Rapi, Eleonora Perruolo, Gianfranco Parati. PLoS One 2016
521
3


Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li, Matthew J Page, Jacqueline Chandler, Vivian A Welch, Julian Pt Higgins, James Thomas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019
3

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
A R Jadad, R A Moore, D Carroll, C Jenkinson, D J Reynolds, D J Gavaghan, H J McQuay. Control Clin Trials 1996
3

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Elie A Akl, Regina Kunz, Gunn Vist, Jan Brozek, Susan Norris, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Paul Glasziou, Hans DeBeer,[...]. J Clin Epidemiol 2011
3





Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.
Jill A Hayden, Danielle A van der Windt, Jennifer L Cartwright, Pierre Côté, Claire Bombardier. Ann Intern Med 2013
2

Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters.
Annamaria Guolo, Cristiano Varin. Stat Methods Med Res 2017
80
2

Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis.
Joanna IntHout, John P A Ioannidis, George F Borm, Jelle J Goeman. J Clin Epidemiol 2015
103
2



Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity.
Michael Borenstein, Julian P T Higgins, Larry V Hedges, Hannah R Rothstein. Res Synth Methods 2017
532
2

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. J Clin Epidemiol 2009
2

How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.
Sara Balduzzi, Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer. Evid Based Ment Health 2019
811
2

A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments.
Pim Cuijpers, Matthias Berking, Gerhard Andersson, Leanne Quigley, Annet Kleiboer, Keith S Dobson. Can J Psychiatry 2013
448
2

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.
Beverley J Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George Wells, Micere Thuku, Candyce Hamel, Julian Moran, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Kristjansson,[...]. BMJ 2017
2

The Role of Early Maladaptive Schemas in the Appearance of Psychological Symptomatology in Adult Women Victims of Child Abuse.
Ana Estévez, Paula Jauregui, Nagore Ozerinjauregi, David Herrero-Fernández. J Child Sex Abus 2017
7
28



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.