A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Priyank Jaini, Johannes Burge. J Vis 2017
Times Cited: 10







List of co-cited articles
105 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2014
46
90


Estimating 3D tilt from local image cues in natural scenes.
Johannes Burge, Brian C McCann, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2016
15
80

Optimal stimulus encoders for natural tasks.
Wilson S Geisler, Jiri Najemnik, Almon D Ing. J Vis 2009
37
80

Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
57
80



Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.
Stephen Sebastian, Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2015
17
60


Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.
Ahna R Girshick, Michael S Landy, Eero P Simoncelli. Nat Neurosci 2011
245
50

Motion illusions as optimal percepts.
Yair Weiss, Eero P Simoncelli, Edward H Adelson. Nat Neurosci 2002
512
50

Normalization as a canonical neural computation.
Matteo Carandini, David J Heeger. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011
767
50


Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes.
Stephen Sebastian, Jared Abrams, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017
16
50

The Southampton-York Natural Scenes (SYNS) dataset: Statistics of surface attitude.
Wendy J Adams, James H Elder, Erich W Graf, Julian Leyland, Arthur J Lugtigheid, Alexander Muryy. Sci Rep 2016
23
40

Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
100
40




"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
35
40


Image/source statistics of surfaces in natural scenes.
Zhiyong Yang, Dale Purves. Network 2003
27
30

Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.
A E Burgess, R F Wagner, R J Jennings, H B Barlow. Science 1981
312
30

Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions.
Wilson S Geisler, Jeffrey S Perry. Vis Neurosci 2009
70
30


Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.
William W Sprague, Emily A Cooper, Ivana Tošić, Martin S Banks. Sci Adv 2015
41
30



Binocular energy responses to natural images.
Paul B Hibbard. Vision Res 2008
24
30


Modeling multiscale subbands of photographic images with fields of Gaussian scale mixtures.
Siwei Lyu, Eero P Simoncelli. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2009
15
30

Flexible gating of contextual influences in natural vision.
Ruben Coen-Cagli, Adam Kohn, Odelia Schwartz. Nat Neurosci 2015
67
30

An image-computable psychophysical spatial vision model.
Heiko H Schütt, Felix A Wichmann. J Vis 2017
13
30

Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.
Johannes Burge, Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro. Curr Biol 2019
10
30

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
30



Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.
Arvind V Iyer, Johannes Burge. J Vis 2018
4
75



Focus cues affect perceived depth.
Simon J Watt, Kurt Akeley, Marc O Ernst, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2005
128
20

Estimation of 3D shape from image orientations.
Roland W Fleming, Daniel Holtmann-Rice, Heinrich H Bülthoff. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
31
20

Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces.
J T Todd, J J Koenderink, A J van Doorn, A M Kappers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996
35
20

The visual perception of 3D shape.
James T Todd. Trends Cogn Sci 2004
101
20


Visual discrimination of local surface structure: slant, tilt, and curvedness.
J Farley Norman, James T Todd, Hideko F Norman, Anna Marie Clayton, T Ryan McBride. Vision Res 2006
28
20

Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability.
Johannes Burge, Ahna R Girshick, Martin S Banks. J Neurosci 2010
39
20

Psychophysics with junctions in real images.
Josh McDermott. Perception 2004
20
20

Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.
James M Hillis, Simon J Watt, Michael S Landy, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2004
243
20


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.