A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

L Demougeot, F Houdayer, A Pélissier, F Mohrez, J Thevenon, Y Duffourd, S Nambot, E Gautier, C Binquet, M Rossi, D Sanlaville, S Béjean, C Peyron, C Thauvin-Robinet, L Faivre. Arch Pediatr 2018
Times Cited: 1







List of co-cited articles
articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
D F Vears, K Sénécal, A J Clarke, L Jackson, A M Laberge, L Lovrecic, A Piton, K L I Van Gassen, H G Yntema, B M Knoppers,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
28
100

Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients.
Carly Rost, Karin M Dent, Jeffrey Botkin, Erin Rothwell. J Genet Couns 2020
1
100

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).
Caroline Savage Bennette, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Donald Patrick, Laura Amendola, Wylie Burke, Fuki M Hisama, Gail P Jarvik, Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra. Genet Med 2013
54
100


Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
203
100

Views of rare disease participants in a UK whole-genome sequencing study towards secondary findings: a qualitative study.
Michael P Mackley, Edward Blair, Michael Parker, Jenny C Taylor, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
11
100

Special Issue Introduction: Inherited Retinal Disease: Novel Candidate Genes, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Inheritance Models.
Frans P M Cremers, Camiel J F Boon, Kinga Bujakowska, Christina Zeitz. Genes (Basel) 2018
31
100

Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.
Shannon Rego, Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld, Stephanie A Bivona, Michael P Snyder, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2019
6
100

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing.
Kelly Hitch, Galen Joseph, Jenna Guiltinan, Jessica Kianmahd, Janey Youngblom, Amie Blanco. J Genet Couns 2014
45
100


"I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.
M Vornanen, K Aktan-Collan, N Hallowell, H Konttinen, H Kääriäinen, A Haukkala. J Community Genet 2018
3
100

When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
Leila Jamal, Jill O Robinson, Kurt D Christensen, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Melody J Slashinski, Denise Lautenbach Perry, Jason L Vassy, Julia Wycliff, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017
24
100

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
799
100

Panel-based genetic diagnostic testing for inherited eye diseases is highly accurate and reproducible, and more sensitive for variant detection, than exome sequencing.
Mark B Consugar, Daniel Navarro-Gomez, Emily M Place, Kinga M Bujakowska, Maria E Sousa, Zoë D Fonseca-Kelly, Daniel G Taub, Maria Janessian, Dan Yi Wang, Elizabeth D Au,[...]. Genet Med 2015
136
100

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
100

Secondary findings from next generation sequencing: Psychological and ethical issues. Family and patient perspectives.
F Houdayer, O Putois, M L Babonneau, H Chaumet, L Joly, C Juif, C C Michon, S Staraci, E Cretin, S Delanoue,[...]. Eur J Med Genet 2019
7
100




Searching for secondary findings: considering actionability and preserving the right not to know.
Bertrand Isidor, Sophie Julia, Pascale Saugier-Veber, Paul-Loup Weil-Dubuc, Stéphane Bézieau, Eric Bieth, Jean-Paul Bonnefont, Arnold Munnich, Franck Bourdeaut, Catherine Bourgain,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
7
100

Patient experiences with gene panels based on exome sequencing in clinical diagnostics: high acceptance and low distress.
A S Sie, J B Prins, W A G van Zelst-Stams, J A Veltman, I Feenstra, N Hoogerbrugge. Clin Genet 2015
16
100

Interest and Attitudes of Patients With Advanced Cancer With Regard to Secondary Germline Findings From Tumor Genomic Profiling.
Jada G Hamilton, Elyse Shuk, Margaux C Genoff, Vivian M Rodríguez, Jennifer L Hay, Kenneth Offit, Mark E Robson. J Oncol Pract 2017
16
100

Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
Melinda L Yushak, Gang Han, Sara Bouberhan, Lianne Epstein, Michael P DiGiovanna, Sarah S Mougalian, Tara B Sanft, Maysa M Abu-Khalaf, Gina G Chung, Stacey M Stein,[...]. Cancer 2016
29
100

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
73
100

Cancer patients' intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing.
Rhodé M Bijlsma, Hester Wessels, Roel H P Wouters, Anne M May, Margreet G E M Ausems, Emile E Voest, Annelien L Bredenoord. Fam Cancer 2018
9
100

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
67
100

Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing.
Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Marc Clausen, Selina Casalino, Salma Shickh, Laura McCuaig, Esha Joshi, Seema Panchal, Kara Semotiuk, Karen Ott,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2020
3
100

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
13
100

Living my family's story: identifying the lived experience in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.
Meghan L Underhill, Robin M Lally, Marc T Kiviniemi, Christine Murekeyisoni, Suzanne S Dickerson. Cancer Nurs 2012
10
100



Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.
K A Kaphingst, J Ivanovich, B B Biesecker, R Dresser, J Seo, L G Dressler, P J Goodfellow, M S Goodman. Clin Genet 2016
27
100

Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.
Bettina Meiser, Ben Storey, Veronica Quinn, Belinda Rahman, Lesley Andrews. J Genet Couns 2016
9
100

Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.
Susan Michie, Jonathan A Smith, Victoria Senior, Theresa M Marteau. Am J Med Genet A 2003
51
100

"It's good to know": experiences of gene identification and result disclosure in familial epilepsies.
Danya F Vears, Karen L Dunn, Samantha A Wake, Ingrid E Scheffer. Epilepsy Res 2015
6
100



Gene therapy for retinal dystrophy.
José Alain Sahel, Deniz Dalkara. Nat Med 2019
6
100

Managing unsolicited findings in genomics: A qualitative interview study with cancer patients.
R M Bijlsma, R H P Wouters, H Wessels, A M May, M G E M Ausems, E E Voest, A L Bredenoord. Psychooncology 2018
9
100



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.