A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Yen-Yuan Chen, Chia-Ming Li, Jyh-Chong Liang, Chin-Chung Tsai. J Med Internet Res 2018
Times Cited: 70







List of co-cited articles
178 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity




DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.
D Charnock, S Shepperd, G Needham, R Gann. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999
829
10

eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.
Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner. J Med Internet Res 2006
597
8

eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale.
Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner. J Med Internet Res 2006
616
7





Associations of eHealth Literacy With Health Behavior Among Adult Internet Users.
Seigo Mitsutake, Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Koichiro Oka. J Med Internet Res 2016
79
5


What is the impact of the Internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study.
Briege M Lagan, Marlene Sinclair, W George Kernohan. Birth 2011
102
5

Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: a web-based survey.
Briege M Lagan, Marlene Sinclair, W George Kernohan. Birth 2010
204
5

Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations.
Rosalie van der Vaart, Alexander Jam van Deursen, Constance Hc Drossaert, Erik Taal, Jan Amg van Dijk, Mart Afj van de Laar. J Med Internet Res 2011
142
5



The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites.
C Boyer, M Selby, J R Scherrer, R D Appel. Comput Biol Med 1998
182
5



eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults.
Bethany Tennant, Michael Stellefson, Virginia Dodd, Beth Chaney, Don Chaney, Samantha Paige, Julia Alber. J Med Internet Res 2015
245
4


Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.
Nancy D Berkman, Stacey L Sheridan, Katrina E Donahue, David J Halpern, Karen Crotty. Ann Intern Med 2011
4

The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes.
Gunther Eysenbach. CA Cancer J Clin 2003
317
4

A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.
S Anne Moorhead, Diane E Hazlett, Laura Harrison, Jennifer K Carroll, Anthea Irwin, Ciska Hoving. J Med Internet Res 2013
748
4

Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: a systematic review.
Padaphet Sayakhot, Mary Carolan-Olah. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016
150
4

eHealth Literacy: In the Quest of the Contributing Factors.
Sofia Xesfingi, Athanassios Vozikis. Interact J Med Res 2016
41
7

Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.
Jeremy Ginsberg, Matthew H Mohebbi, Rajan S Patel, Lynnette Brammer, Mark S Smolinski, Larry Brilliant. Nature 2009
4

Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.
Bradford W Hesse, David E Nelson, Gary L Kreps, Robert T Croyle, Neeraj K Arora, Barbara K Rimer, Kasisomayajula Viswanath. Arch Intern Med 2005
803
4


Untangling the Web--patients, doctors, and the Internet.
Pamela Hartzband, Jerome Groopman. N Engl J Med 2010
67
4

Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.
Sameer Badarudeen, Sanjeev Sabharwal. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010
230
4

Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.
G K Berland, M N Elliott, L S Morales, J I Algazy, R L Kravitz, M S Broder, D E Kanouse, J A Muñoz, J A Puyol, M Lara,[...]. JAMA 2001
683
4

Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies.
Elisabeth Beaunoyer, Marianne Arsenault, Anna M Lomanowska, Matthieu J Guitton. Patient Educ Couns 2017
73
4

A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis.
Golnar Aref-Adib, Puffin O'Hanlon, Kate Fullarton, Nicola Morant, Andrew Sommerlad, Sonia Johnson, David Osborn. BMC Psychiatry 2016
36
8

Patients' use of the Internet for medical information.
Joseph A Diaz, Rebecca A Griffith, James J Ng, Steven E Reinert, Peter D Friedmann, Anne W Moulton. J Gen Intern Med 2002
518
4


Use of Google Trends to Track Online Behavior and Interest in Kidney Stone Surgery.
Paulette Cutruzzula Dreher, Carmen Tong, Eric Ghiraldi, Justin I Friedlander. Urology 2018
27
11



Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association.
M A Winker, A Flanagin, B Chi-Lum, J White, K Andrews, R L Kennett, C D DeAngelis, R A Musacchio. JAMA 2000
281
4


Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Jatin Kaicker, Victoria Borg Debono, Wilfred Dang, Norman Buckley, Lehana Thabane. BMC Med 2010
101
4


Examining health information-seeking behaviors of older adults.
Shomir Chaudhuri, Thai Le, Cathy White, Hilaire Thompson, George Demiris. Comput Inform Nurs 2013
59
3

eHealth Literacy and Health Behaviors Affecting Modern College Students: A Pilot Study of Issues Identified by the American College Health Association.
Rebecca Katherine Britt, William Bart Collins, Kari Wilson, Georgiann Linnemeier, Andrew Mark Englebert. J Med Internet Res 2017
30
6

Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.
Emily Kontos, Kelly D Blake, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Abby Prestin. J Med Internet Res 2014
413
2

Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.
Nicola Diviani, Bas van den Putte, Stefano Giani, Julia Cm van Weert. J Med Internet Res 2015
187
2



Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube.
Tejas Desai, Afreen Shariff, Vibhu Dhingra, Deeba Minhas, Megan Eure, Mark Kats. PLoS One 2013
105
2


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.