A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
Times Cited: 109







List of co-cited articles
414 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
17

Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Megan A Allyse, David H Robinson, Matthew J Ferber, Richard R Sharp. Mayo Clin Proc 2018
53
28

Direct-to-consumer raw genetic data and third-party interpretation services: more burden than bargain?
Tia Moscarello, Brittney Murray, Chloe M Reuter, Erin Demo. Genet Med 2019
20
65

Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.
Lauren Badalato, Louiza Kalokairinou, Pascal Borry. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
31
38

Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services.
Catharine Wang, Tiernan J Cahill, Andrew Parlato, Blake Wertz, Qiankun Zhong, Tricia Norkunas Cunningham, James J Cummings. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018
22
50

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
10


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
799
9

Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Deanna Alexis Carere, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Mack T Ruffin, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Ann Intern Med 2016
65
13

Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kelly F J Stewart, Anke Wesselius, Maartje A C Schreurs, Annemie M W J Schols, Maurice P Zeegers. J Community Genet 2018
30
26

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Robert C Green. Public Health Genomics 2017
57
14

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
57
12

Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award.
Mary-Claire King, Ephrat Levy-Lahad, Amnon Lahad. JAMA 2014
172
6


Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.
Karoline B Kuchenbaecker, John L Hopper, Daniel R Barnes, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Thea M Mooij, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sarah Jervis, Flora E van Leeuwen, Roger L Milne, Nadine Andrieu,[...]. JAMA 2017
783
6




Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.
Monkol Lek, Konrad J Karczewski, Eric V Minikel, Kaitlin E Samocha, Eric Banks, Timothy Fennell, Anne H O'Donnell-Luria, James S Ware, Andrew J Hill, Beryl B Cummings,[...]. Nature 2016
6

Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches.
Yaniv Erlich, Tal Shor, Itsik Pe'er, Shai Carmi. Science 2018
81
7

Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.
Jada G Hamilton, Ekland Abdiwahab, Heather M Edwards, Min-Lin Fang, Andrew Jdayani, Erica S Breslau. J Gen Intern Med 2017
45
13


Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Sarah C Nelson, Deborah J Bowen, Stephanie M Fullerton. Am J Hum Genet 2019
14
42

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
112
6

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Rachel Horton, Gillian Crawford, Lindsey Freeman, Angela Fenwick, Caroline F Wright, Anneke Lucassen. BMJ 2019
18
33

The dawn of consumer-directed testing.
Erica Ramos, Scott M Weissman. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018
26
19


A global reference for human genetic variation.
Adam Auton, Lisa D Brooks, Richard M Durbin, Erik P Garrison, Hyun Min Kang, Jan O Korbel, Jonathan L Marchini, Shane McCarthy, Gil A McVean, Gonçalo R Abecasis. Nature 2015
5

Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Diane R Koeller, Wendy R Uhlmann, Deanna Alexis Carere, Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts. J Genet Couns 2017
19
26

Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.
Adam Hudson Buchanan, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Janet L Williams. Front Oncol 2016
55
9

Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Allison W Kurian, Yun Li, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Sarah T Hawley, Monica Morrow, M Chandler McLeod, Reshma Jagsi, Steven J Katz. J Clin Oncol 2017
129
5

Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Deanna Alexis Carere, Tyler J VanderWeele, Jason L Vassy, Cathelijne H van der Wouden, J Scott Roberts, Peter Kraft, Robert C Green. Genet Med 2017
19
26

The impact of raw DNA availability and corresponding online interpretation services: A mixed-methods study.
Caitlin G Allen, Jazmine Gabriel, Maureen Flynn, Tricia N Cunningham, Catharine Wang. Transl Behav Med 2018
14
35

Projecting the Supply and Demand for Certified Genetic Counselors: a Workforce Study.
Jennifer M Hoskovec, R L Bennett, M E Carey, J E DaVanzo, M Dougherty, S E Hahn, B S LeRoy, S O'Neal, J G Richardson, C A Wicklund. J Genet Couns 2018
114
5


Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
Ranjit Manchanda, Shreeya Patel, Vladimir S Gordeev, Antonis C Antoniou, Shantel Smith, Andrew Lee, John L Hopper, Robert J MacInnis, Clare Turnbull, Susan J Ramus,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018
73
5

ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.
Melissa J Landrum, Jennifer M Lee, Mark Benson, Garth Brown, Chen Chao, Shanmuga Chitipiralla, Baoshan Gu, Jennifer Hart, Douglas Hoffman, Jeffrey Hoover,[...]. Nucleic Acids Res 2016
4

GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine.
Robert C Green, Denise Lautenbach, Amy L McGuire. N Engl J Med 2015
95
4

Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations.
Amit V Khera, Mark Chaffin, Krishna G Aragam, Mary E Haas, Carolina Roselli, Seung Hoan Choi, Pradeep Natarajan, Eric S Lander, Steven A Lubitz, Patrick T Ellinor,[...]. Nat Genet 2018
744
4

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Gareth J Hollands, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Sarah King, Theresa M Marteau. BMJ 2016
228
4

Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing.
Susanne B Haga, William T Barry, Rachel Mills, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Laura Svetkey, Jennifer Sullivan, Huntington F Willard. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013
125
4

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
84
4

Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis.
K D Christensen, J L Vassy, L Jamal, L S Lehmann, M J Slashinski, D L Perry, J O Robinson, J Blumenthal-Barby, L Z Feuerman, M F Murray,[...]. Clin Genet 2016
71
5

Utilization and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing and Counseling in a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOUT Study.
Joanne Armstrong, Michele Toscano, Nancy Kotchko, Sue Friedman, Marc D Schwartz, Katherine S Virgo, Kristian Lynch, James E Andrews, Claudia X Aguado Loi, Joseph E Bauer,[...]. JAMA Oncol 2015
78
5

The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Jason L Vassy, Kurt D Christensen, Erica F Schonman, Carrie L Blout, Jill O Robinson, Joel B Krier, Pamela M Diamond, Matthew Lebo, Kalotina Machini, Danielle R Azzariti,[...]. Ann Intern Med 2017
98
4

Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.
Arjun K Manrai, Birgit H Funke, Heidi L Rehm, Morten S Olesen, Bradley A Maron, Peter Szolovits, David M Margulies, Joseph Loscalzo, Isaac S Kohane. N Engl J Med 2016
304
4


Nutritional Genomics and Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: An Overview.
Marta Guasch-Ferré, Hassan S Dashti, Jordi Merino. Adv Nutr 2018
13
30

Legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Europe: a fragmented regulatory landscape.
L Kalokairinou, H C Howard, S Slokenberga, E Fisher, M Flatscher-Thöni, M Hartlev, R van Hellemondt, J Juškevičius, J Kapelenska-Pregowska, P Kováč,[...]. J Community Genet 2018
28
14

openSNP--a crowdsourced web resource for personal genomics.
Bastian Greshake, Philipp E Bayer, Helge Rausch, Julia Reda. PLoS One 2014
30
13


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.