A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Jun Moriya. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018
Times Cited: 10







List of co-cited articles
50 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


An imagery-induced reversal of intertrial priming in visual search.
Brett A Cochrane, Andrea A Nwabuike, David R Thomson, Bruce Milliken. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2018
12
80

Strategic visual imagery and automatic priming effects in pop-out visual search.
Brett A Cochrane, Hanzhuang Zhu, Bruce Milliken. Conscious Cogn 2018
8
87

Cueing color imagery: A critical analysis of imagery-perception congruency effects.
Brett A Cochrane, Shailee Siddhpuria, Bruce Milliken. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2019
8
87

Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.
V Maljkovic, K Nakayama. Mem Cognit 1994
726
60

Imagined event files: An interplay between imagined and perceived objects.
Brett A Cochrane, Bruce Milliken. Psychon Bull Rev 2019
10
60

The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.
Brett A Cochrane, Bruce Milliken. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2020
9
66


Colors in mind: a novel paradigm to investigate pure color imagery.
Andrea L Wantz, Grégoire Borst, Fred W Mast, Janek S Lobmaier. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2015
8
62

The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception.
Joel Pearson, Colin W G Clifford, Frank Tong. Curr Biol 2008
144
50

Visualizing Trumps Vision in Training Attention.
Robert M G Reinhart, Laura J McClenahan, Geoffrey F Woodman. Psychol Sci 2015
12
50

Investigating the role of verbal templates in contingent capture by color.
Diane Baier, Ulrich Ansorge. Atten Percept Psychophys 2019
8
50

The functional effects of color perception and color imagery.
Shuai Chang, David E Lewis, Joel Pearson. J Vis 2013
22
40


Working memory can guide pop-out search.
David Soto, Glyn W Humphreys, Dietmar Heinke. Vision Res 2006
114
40

Evaluating the mind's eye: the metacognition of visual imagery.
Joel Pearson, Rosanne L Rademaker, Frank Tong. Psychol Sci 2011
78
40

Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.
David Soto, Dietmar Heinke, Glyn W Humphreys, Manuel J Blanco. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005
335
40

Visual imagery influences attentional guidance during visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Brett A Cochrane, Ben Townsend, Ryan C Lee, Joey K Legere, Bruce Milliken, Judith M Shedden. Atten Percept Psychophys 2021
4
100

Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.
Brett A Cochrane, Vanessa Ng, Anisha Khosla, Bruce Milliken. Psychon Bull Rev 2021
5
80

9
33

Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes.
Thomas Töllner, Klaus Gramann, Hermann J Müller, Monika Kiss, Martin Eimer. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2008
97
30

Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
Olga Shurygina, Árni Kristjánsson, Luke Tudge, Andrey Chetverikov. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2019
17
30

Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks.
Arni Kristjánsson, Gianluca Campana. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010
254
30

Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
J M Wolfe, K R Cave, S L Franzel. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989
30


The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate.
Joel Pearson, Stephen M Kosslyn. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015
83
30

Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery.
Nadine Dijkstra, Sander E Bosch, Marcel A J van Gerven. Trends Cogn Sci 2019
62
30

The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia.
Rebecca Keogh, Joel Pearson. Cortex 2018
53
30

Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively.
Xu Cui, Cameron B Jeter, Dongni Yang, P Read Montague, David M Eagleman. Vision Res 2007
179
30

How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.
Jeremy M Wolfe, Todd S Horowitz, Naomi Kenner, Megan Hyle, Nina Vasan. Vision Res 2004
182
30

Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
722
30

Top-down imagery overrides the influence of selection history effects.
Brett A Cochrane, Vanessa Ng, Bruce Milliken. Conscious Cogn 2021
3
100


A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects.
Dominique Lamy, Amit Yashar, Lital Ruderman. Vision Res 2010
52
20

The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.
Dominique Lamy, Alon Zivony, Amit Yashar. Vision Res 2011
30
20

Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.
Jeremy M Wolfe, Serena J Butcher, Carol Lee, Megan Hyle. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003
300
20



A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia.
Alexei J Dawes, Rebecca Keogh, Thomas Andrillon, Joel Pearson. Sci Rep 2020
35
20


Lives without imagery - Congenital aphantasia.
Adam Zeman, Michaela Dewar, Sergio Della Sala. Cortex 2015
91
20


Individual differences in mental imagery ability: a computational analysis.
S M Kosslyn, J Brunn, K R Cave, R W Wallach. Cognition 1984
82
20

Vividness of Visual Imagery Depends on the Neural Overlap with Perception in Visual Areas.
Nadine Dijkstra, Sander E Bosch, Marcel A J van Gerven. J Neurosci 2017
84
20


Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.
W F Bacon, H E Egeth. Percept Psychophys 1994
673
20

Long-term abstract learning of attentional set.
Andrew B Leber, Jun-Ichiro Kawahara, Yuji Gabari. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009
55
20




Comparing imagery and perception: Using eye movements to dissociate mechanisms in search.
Brett A Cochrane, Chao Wang, Jay Pratt, Bruce Milliken, Hong-Jin Sun. Atten Percept Psychophys 2021
2
100


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.