A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Anna Middleton, Álvaro Mendes, Caroline M Benjamin, Heidi Carmen Howard. Per Med 2017
Times Cited: 27







List of co-cited articles
75 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Megan A Allyse, David H Robinson, Matthew J Ferber, Richard R Sharp. Mayo Clin Proc 2018
54
25



Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data.
Emilia Niemiec, Heidi Carmen Howard. Appl Transl Genom 2016
25
20

Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Loredana Covolo, Sara Rubinelli, Elisabetta Ceretti, Umberto Gelatti. J Med Internet Res 2015
60
18

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.
Sylvia A Metcalfe, Chriselle Hickerton, Jacqueline Savard, Bronwyn Terrill, Erin Turbitt, Clara Gaff, Kathleen Gray, Anna Middleton, Brenda Wilson, Ainsley J Newson. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
8
62



Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.
Brianne E Kirkpatrick, Misha D Rashkin. J Genet Couns 2017
19
21

An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
Gemma R Brett, Sylvia A Metcalfe, David J Amor, Jane L Halliday. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
36
14

Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kelly F J Stewart, Anke Wesselius, Maartje A C Schreurs, Annemie M W J Schols, Maurice P Zeegers. J Community Genet 2018
34
14

Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Emilia Niemiec, Louiza Kalokairinou, Heidi Carmen Howard. Per Med 2017
12
33

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
154
11

Genetic counselors and Genomic Counseling in the United Kingdom.
Anna Middleton, Georgina Hall, Christine Patch. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2015
19
15

Health system implications of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Wylie Burke. Public Health Genomics 2011
28
11


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
11

The dawn of consumer-directed testing.
Erica Ramos, Scott M Weissman. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018
27
11



False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
114
11


Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Sarah C Nelson, Deborah J Bowen, Stephanie M Fullerton. Am J Hum Genet 2019
15
20


Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
Pascal Borry, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
71
7


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
347
7




Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
7


An index of barriers for the implementation of personalised medicine and pharmacogenomics in Europe.
Denis Horgan, Marleen Jansen, Lada Leyens, Jonathan A Lal, Ralf Sudbrak, Erica Hackenitz, Ulrike Bußhoff, Wolfgang Ballensiefen, Angela Brand. Public Health Genomics 2014
45
7


Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.
E Vayena, E Gourna, J Streuli, E Hafen, B Prainsack. Public Health Genomics 2012
36
7


Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Diane R Koeller, Wendy R Uhlmann, Deanna Alexis Carere, Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts. J Genet Couns 2017
22
9

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick, Deanna Alexis Carere, Wendy R Uhlmann, Mack T Ruffin, Robert C Green. Public Health Genomics 2017
61
7

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of european guidelines, recommendations, and position statements.
Muhammad Rafiq, Carolina Ianuale, Walter Ricciardi, Stefania Boccia. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2015
22
9

Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Deanna Alexis Carere, Anke H Maitland-van der Zee, Mack T Ruffin, J Scott Roberts, Robert C Green. Ann Intern Med 2016
66
7

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
7

2013 Review and Update of the Genetic Counseling Practice Based Competencies by a Task Force of the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling.
Debra Lochner Doyle, Rawan I Awwad, Jehannine C Austin, Bonnie J Baty, Amanda L Bergner, Stephanie J Brewster, Lori A H Erby, Cathi Rubin Franklin, Anne E Greb, Robin E Grubs,[...]. J Genet Couns 2016
28
7

Recommendations for the integration of genomics into clinical practice.
Sarah Bowdin, Adel Gilbert, Emma Bedoukian, Christopher Carew, Margaret P Adam, John Belmont, Barbara Bernhardt, Leslie Biesecker, Hans T Bjornsson, Miriam Blitzer,[...]. Genet Med 2016
84
7

From genetic counseling to "genomic counseling".
Kelly E Ormond. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2013
48
7


A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
375
7

Development of a registration system for genetic counsellors and nurses in health-care services in Europe.
Milena Paneque, Ramona Moldovan, Christophe Cordier, Clara Serra-Juhé, Irene Feroce, Debby Lambert, Inga Bjørnevoll, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
17
11

The role of genetic counsellors in genomic healthcare in the United Kingdom: a statement by the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors.
Anna Middleton, Peter Marks, Anita Bruce, Liwsi K Protheroe-Davies, Cath King, Oonagh Claber, Catherine Houghton, Claire Giffney, Rhona Macleod, Claire Dolling,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
18
11

Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.
Robert C Green, Katrina A B Goddard, Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Paul S Appelbaum, Jonathan S Berg, Barbara A Bernhardt, Leslie G Biesecker, Sawona Biswas, Carrie L Blout,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2016
98
7

A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.
A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Linda A Bradley, Ben A Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Muin J Khoury. Am J Hum Genet 2008
167
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.