A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018
Times Cited: 16







List of co-cited articles
162 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.
Sophia B Hufnagel, Lisa J Martin, Amy Cassedy, Robert J Hopkin, Armand H Matheny Antommaria. Am J Med Genet A 2016
18
50

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
43

Giving adolescents a voice: the types of genetic information adolescents choose to learn and why.
Josie Pervola, Melanie F Myers, Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows. Genet Med 2019
11
63

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
37

Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.
Jeffrey R Botkin, John W Belmont, Jonathan S Berg, Benjamin E Berkman, Yvonne Bombard, Ingrid A Holm, Howard P Levy, Kelly E Ormond, Howard M Saal, Nancy B Spinner,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2015
220
37

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
65
37


Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
Brooke L Levenseller, Danielle J Soucier, Victoria A Miller, Diana Harris, Laura Conway, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2014
54
31

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
31

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
31

Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects.
Petronella Grootens-Wiegers, Irma M Hein, Jos M van den Broek, Martine C de Vries. BMC Pediatr 2017
68
25

Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings.
Maya Sabatello, Paul S Appelbaum. J Law Med Ethics 2016
17
25

Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.
Lainie Friedman Ross, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, Rebecca R Anderson. Genet Med 2013
259
25

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
56
25

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
55
25

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
25

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
Paul A Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G Conde. J Biomed Inform 2009
18

Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders.
Allyn McConkie Rosell, Loren D M Pena, Kelly Schoch, Rebecca Spillmann, Jennifer Sullivan, Stephen R Hooper, Yong-Hui Jiang, Nicolas Mathey-Andrews, David B Goldstein, Vandana Shashi. J Genet Couns 2016
49
18

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.
Amanda L Bergner, Juli Bollinger, Karen S Raraigh, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Carrie Lynn Blout, Aida Bytyci Telegrafi, Cynthia A James. Am J Med Genet A 2014
28
18

Gratitude, protective buffering, and cognitive dissonance: How families respond to pediatric whole exome sequencing in the absence of actionable results.
Allison Werner-Lin, Lori Zaspel, Mae Carlson, Rebecca Mueller, Sarah A Walser, Ria Desai, Barbara A Bernhardt. Am J Med Genet A 2018
11
27

Children and young people's understanding of inherited conditions and their attitudes towards genetic testing: A systematic review.
B C McGill, C E Wakefield, J Vetsch, K Barlow-Stewart, N A Kasparian, A F Patenaude, M-A Young, R J Cohn, K M Tucker. Clin Genet 2019
14
21

Opening the "black box" of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Celine Lewis, Christine Patch, Melissa Hill, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Lyn S Chitty. Genet Med 2019
8
37

Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project.
Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Jaclyn B Murry, Kalotina Machini, Matthew S Lebo, Timothy W Yu, Shawn Fayer, Casie A Genetti, Talia S Schwartz, Pankaj B Agrawal, Richard B Parad,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019
61
18


Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Katie L Lewis, Gillian W Hooker, Philip D Connors, Travis C Hyams, Martha F Wright, Samantha Caldwell, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2016
46
18

Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.
Ingrid A Holm, Sarah K Savage, Robert C Green, Eric Juengst, Amy McGuire, Susan Kornetsky, Stephanie J Brewster, Steven Joffe, Patrick Taylor. Genet Med 2014
40
18

The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Phoebe L Bacon, Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Sarah K Savage, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
17
18

Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
9
33



Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
38
18

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
57
18

Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Michael J Bamshad, Holly K Tabor. Am J Med Genet A 2014
37
18

Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.
Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Kari G Chaffee, Marguerite E Robinson, Deborah R Gordon, Noralane M Lindor, Barbara A Koenig. J Law Med Ethics 2015
21
18


Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
7
42

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
51
18

The SickKids Genome Clinic: developing and evaluating a pediatric model for individualized genomic medicine.
S C Bowdin, R Z Hayeems, N Monfared, R D Cohn, M S Meyn. Clin Genet 2016
25
18

Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project.
J Scott Roberts, Jill O Robinson, Pamela M Diamond, Archana Bharadwaj, Kurt D Christensen, Kaitlyn B Lee, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2018
31
18

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
5
60

Experiences and perspectives on the return of secondary findings among genetic epidemiologists.
Catherine M Stein, Roselle Ponsaran, Erika S Trapl, Aaron J Goldenberg. Genet Med 2019
5
60

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
469
12


Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment.
Megan A Lewis, Alex Stine, Ryan S Paquin, Carol Mansfield, Dallas Wood, Christine Rini, Myra I Roche, Cynthia M Powell, Jonathan S Berg, Donald B Bailey. Genet Med 2018
11
18

Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations.
Jan M Friedman, Martina C Cornel, Aaron J Goldenberg, Karla J Lister, Karine Sénécal, Danya F Vears. BMC Med Genomics 2017
41
12

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing.
Layla Shahmirzadi, Elizabeth C Chao, Erika Palmaer, Melissa C Parra, Sha Tang, Kelly D Farwell Gonzalez. Genet Med 2014
74
12

Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.
Jonathan S Berg, Pankaj B Agrawal, Donald B Bailey, Alan H Beggs, Steven E Brenner, Amy M Brower, Julie A Cakici, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Kee Chan, Flavia Chen,[...]. Pediatrics 2017
95
12

Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children.
Caroline F Wright, David R FitzPatrick, Helen V Firth. Nat Rev Genet 2018
157
12

Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test.
Anath C Lionel, Gregory Costain, Nasim Monfared, Susan Walker, Miriam S Reuter, S Mohsen Hosseini, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram, Daniele Merico, Rebekah Jobling, Thomas Nalpathamkalam,[...]. Genet Med 2018
192
12

Increasing genomic literacy among adolescents.
Maya Sabatello, Ying Chen, Saskia C Sanderson, Wendy K Chung, Paul S Appelbaum. Genet Med 2019
7
28


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.